Cargando…

Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans

PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an algorithm to predict gamma passing rate (GPR) in the volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 clinical VMAT plans, including 28 mediastina, 25 head and neck, 40 brains intensity‐modulated radiosurgery, and 25 pros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salari, Elahheh, Shuai Xu, Kevin, Sperling, Nicholas Niven, Parsai, E. Ishmael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13824
_version_ 1784887826760859648
author Salari, Elahheh
Shuai Xu, Kevin
Sperling, Nicholas Niven
Parsai, E. Ishmael
author_facet Salari, Elahheh
Shuai Xu, Kevin
Sperling, Nicholas Niven
Parsai, E. Ishmael
author_sort Salari, Elahheh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an algorithm to predict gamma passing rate (GPR) in the volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 clinical VMAT plans, including 28 mediastina, 25 head and neck, 40 brains intensity‐modulated radiosurgery, and 25 prostate cases, were created in RayStation treatment planning system for Edge and TrueBeam linacs. In‐house scripts were developed to compute Modulation indices such as plan‐averaged beam area (PA), plan‐averaged beam irregularity (PI), total monitor unit (MU), leaf travel/arc length, mean dose rate variation, and mean gantry speed variation. Pretreatment verifications were performed on ArcCHECK phantom with SNC software. GPR was calculated with 3%/2 mm and 10% threshold. The dataset was randomly split into a training (70%) and a test (30%) dataset. A random forest regression (RFR) model and support vector regression (SVR) with linear kernel were trained to predict GPR using the complexity metrics as input. The prediction performance was evaluated by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE), R (2), and root mean square error (RMSE). RESULTS: RMSEs at γ 3%/2 mm for RFR and SVR were 1.407 ± 0.103 and 1.447 ± 0.121, respectively. MAE was 1.14 ± 0.084 for RFR and 1.101 ± 0.09 for SVR. R (2) was equal to 0.703 ± 0.027 and 0.689 ± 0.053 for RFR and SVR, respectively. GPR of 3%/2 mm with a 10% threshold can be predicted with an error smaller than 3% for 94% of plans using RFR and SVR models. The most important metrics that had the greatest impact on how accurately GPR can be predicted were determined to be the PA, PI, and total MU. CONCLUSION: In terms of its prediction values and errors, SVR (linear) appeared to be comparable with RFR for this dataset. Based on our results, the PA, PI, and total MU calculations may be useful in guiding VMAT plan evaluation and ultimately reducing uncertainties in planning and radiation delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99241082023-02-14 Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans Salari, Elahheh Shuai Xu, Kevin Sperling, Nicholas Niven Parsai, E. Ishmael J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an algorithm to predict gamma passing rate (GPR) in the volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 clinical VMAT plans, including 28 mediastina, 25 head and neck, 40 brains intensity‐modulated radiosurgery, and 25 prostate cases, were created in RayStation treatment planning system for Edge and TrueBeam linacs. In‐house scripts were developed to compute Modulation indices such as plan‐averaged beam area (PA), plan‐averaged beam irregularity (PI), total monitor unit (MU), leaf travel/arc length, mean dose rate variation, and mean gantry speed variation. Pretreatment verifications were performed on ArcCHECK phantom with SNC software. GPR was calculated with 3%/2 mm and 10% threshold. The dataset was randomly split into a training (70%) and a test (30%) dataset. A random forest regression (RFR) model and support vector regression (SVR) with linear kernel were trained to predict GPR using the complexity metrics as input. The prediction performance was evaluated by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE), R (2), and root mean square error (RMSE). RESULTS: RMSEs at γ 3%/2 mm for RFR and SVR were 1.407 ± 0.103 and 1.447 ± 0.121, respectively. MAE was 1.14 ± 0.084 for RFR and 1.101 ± 0.09 for SVR. R (2) was equal to 0.703 ± 0.027 and 0.689 ± 0.053 for RFR and SVR, respectively. GPR of 3%/2 mm with a 10% threshold can be predicted with an error smaller than 3% for 94% of plans using RFR and SVR models. The most important metrics that had the greatest impact on how accurately GPR can be predicted were determined to be the PA, PI, and total MU. CONCLUSION: In terms of its prediction values and errors, SVR (linear) appeared to be comparable with RFR for this dataset. Based on our results, the PA, PI, and total MU calculations may be useful in guiding VMAT plan evaluation and ultimately reducing uncertainties in planning and radiation delivery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9924108/ /pubmed/36495010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13824 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Salari, Elahheh
Shuai Xu, Kevin
Sperling, Nicholas Niven
Parsai, E. Ishmael
Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans
title Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans
title_full Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans
title_fullStr Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans
title_full_unstemmed Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans
title_short Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans
title_sort using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13824
work_keys_str_mv AT salarielahheh usingmachinelearningtopredictgammapassingrateinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplans
AT shuaixukevin usingmachinelearningtopredictgammapassingrateinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplans
AT sperlingnicholasniven usingmachinelearningtopredictgammapassingrateinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplans
AT parsaieishmael usingmachinelearningtopredictgammapassingrateinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplans