Cargando…
Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans
PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an algorithm to predict gamma passing rate (GPR) in the volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 clinical VMAT plans, including 28 mediastina, 25 head and neck, 40 brains intensity‐modulated radiosurgery, and 25 pros...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13824 |
_version_ | 1784887826760859648 |
---|---|
author | Salari, Elahheh Shuai Xu, Kevin Sperling, Nicholas Niven Parsai, E. Ishmael |
author_facet | Salari, Elahheh Shuai Xu, Kevin Sperling, Nicholas Niven Parsai, E. Ishmael |
author_sort | Salari, Elahheh |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an algorithm to predict gamma passing rate (GPR) in the volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 clinical VMAT plans, including 28 mediastina, 25 head and neck, 40 brains intensity‐modulated radiosurgery, and 25 prostate cases, were created in RayStation treatment planning system for Edge and TrueBeam linacs. In‐house scripts were developed to compute Modulation indices such as plan‐averaged beam area (PA), plan‐averaged beam irregularity (PI), total monitor unit (MU), leaf travel/arc length, mean dose rate variation, and mean gantry speed variation. Pretreatment verifications were performed on ArcCHECK phantom with SNC software. GPR was calculated with 3%/2 mm and 10% threshold. The dataset was randomly split into a training (70%) and a test (30%) dataset. A random forest regression (RFR) model and support vector regression (SVR) with linear kernel were trained to predict GPR using the complexity metrics as input. The prediction performance was evaluated by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE), R (2), and root mean square error (RMSE). RESULTS: RMSEs at γ 3%/2 mm for RFR and SVR were 1.407 ± 0.103 and 1.447 ± 0.121, respectively. MAE was 1.14 ± 0.084 for RFR and 1.101 ± 0.09 for SVR. R (2) was equal to 0.703 ± 0.027 and 0.689 ± 0.053 for RFR and SVR, respectively. GPR of 3%/2 mm with a 10% threshold can be predicted with an error smaller than 3% for 94% of plans using RFR and SVR models. The most important metrics that had the greatest impact on how accurately GPR can be predicted were determined to be the PA, PI, and total MU. CONCLUSION: In terms of its prediction values and errors, SVR (linear) appeared to be comparable with RFR for this dataset. Based on our results, the PA, PI, and total MU calculations may be useful in guiding VMAT plan evaluation and ultimately reducing uncertainties in planning and radiation delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9924108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99241082023-02-14 Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans Salari, Elahheh Shuai Xu, Kevin Sperling, Nicholas Niven Parsai, E. Ishmael J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an algorithm to predict gamma passing rate (GPR) in the volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 clinical VMAT plans, including 28 mediastina, 25 head and neck, 40 brains intensity‐modulated radiosurgery, and 25 prostate cases, were created in RayStation treatment planning system for Edge and TrueBeam linacs. In‐house scripts were developed to compute Modulation indices such as plan‐averaged beam area (PA), plan‐averaged beam irregularity (PI), total monitor unit (MU), leaf travel/arc length, mean dose rate variation, and mean gantry speed variation. Pretreatment verifications were performed on ArcCHECK phantom with SNC software. GPR was calculated with 3%/2 mm and 10% threshold. The dataset was randomly split into a training (70%) and a test (30%) dataset. A random forest regression (RFR) model and support vector regression (SVR) with linear kernel were trained to predict GPR using the complexity metrics as input. The prediction performance was evaluated by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE), R (2), and root mean square error (RMSE). RESULTS: RMSEs at γ 3%/2 mm for RFR and SVR were 1.407 ± 0.103 and 1.447 ± 0.121, respectively. MAE was 1.14 ± 0.084 for RFR and 1.101 ± 0.09 for SVR. R (2) was equal to 0.703 ± 0.027 and 0.689 ± 0.053 for RFR and SVR, respectively. GPR of 3%/2 mm with a 10% threshold can be predicted with an error smaller than 3% for 94% of plans using RFR and SVR models. The most important metrics that had the greatest impact on how accurately GPR can be predicted were determined to be the PA, PI, and total MU. CONCLUSION: In terms of its prediction values and errors, SVR (linear) appeared to be comparable with RFR for this dataset. Based on our results, the PA, PI, and total MU calculations may be useful in guiding VMAT plan evaluation and ultimately reducing uncertainties in planning and radiation delivery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9924108/ /pubmed/36495010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13824 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Salari, Elahheh Shuai Xu, Kevin Sperling, Nicholas Niven Parsai, E. Ishmael Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans |
title | Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans |
title_full | Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans |
title_fullStr | Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans |
title_full_unstemmed | Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans |
title_short | Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans |
title_sort | using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy treatment plans |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13824 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salarielahheh usingmachinelearningtopredictgammapassingrateinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplans AT shuaixukevin usingmachinelearningtopredictgammapassingrateinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplans AT sperlingnicholasniven usingmachinelearningtopredictgammapassingrateinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplans AT parsaieishmael usingmachinelearningtopredictgammapassingrateinvolumetricmodulatedarctherapytreatmentplans |