Cargando…

Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software

Numerous medical conditions are associated with pregnancy in women, including pulmonary thromboembolism, which can be fatal. An effective treatment of this condition is the positioning of an inferior vena cava filter (IVC‐F) under the guidance of X‐ray imaging. However, this procedure involves the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsunaga, Yuta, Haba, Tomonobu, Kobayashi, Masanao, Suzuki, Shoichi, Asada, Yasuki, Chida, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13884
_version_ 1784887830741254144
author Matsunaga, Yuta
Haba, Tomonobu
Kobayashi, Masanao
Suzuki, Shoichi
Asada, Yasuki
Chida, Koichi
author_facet Matsunaga, Yuta
Haba, Tomonobu
Kobayashi, Masanao
Suzuki, Shoichi
Asada, Yasuki
Chida, Koichi
author_sort Matsunaga, Yuta
collection PubMed
description Numerous medical conditions are associated with pregnancy in women, including pulmonary thromboembolism, which can be fatal. An effective treatment of this condition is the positioning of an inferior vena cava filter (IVC‐F) under the guidance of X‐ray imaging. However, this procedure involves the risk of high radiation exposure to pregnant women and fetuses. Moreover, there are no published reports comparing the values of fetal dose, received during IVC‐F placement in pregnant women, determined using dose calculation software and actual measurements. To address this issue, we compared the fetal radiation dose and entrance surface dose (ESD) for pregnant women for gestation periods of 6 and 9 months based on software calculations and actual measurements. The ESD and fetal doses were estimated for a pregnant woman for gestation periods of 6 and 9 months during IVC‐F placement. For actual measurements, one pregnant model phantom was constructed using an anthropomorphic phantom, and two custom‐made different‐sized abdomen phantoms were used to simulate pregnancy. The custom‐made abdomen phantoms were constructed using polyurethane. For software calculations, the software utilized a set of anatomically realistic pregnant patient phantoms. The ESD estimated using the software was consistent with the measured ESD, but the fetal dose estimations were more complicated due to fetal positioning. During fetal dose evaluation using software calculations, the user must carefully consider how much of the fetal length is in the irradiation field to prevent underestimation or overestimation. Despite the errors, the software can assist the user in identifying the magnitude of the dose approaching critical limits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99241242023-02-14 Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software Matsunaga, Yuta Haba, Tomonobu Kobayashi, Masanao Suzuki, Shoichi Asada, Yasuki Chida, Koichi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Protection & Regulations Numerous medical conditions are associated with pregnancy in women, including pulmonary thromboembolism, which can be fatal. An effective treatment of this condition is the positioning of an inferior vena cava filter (IVC‐F) under the guidance of X‐ray imaging. However, this procedure involves the risk of high radiation exposure to pregnant women and fetuses. Moreover, there are no published reports comparing the values of fetal dose, received during IVC‐F placement in pregnant women, determined using dose calculation software and actual measurements. To address this issue, we compared the fetal radiation dose and entrance surface dose (ESD) for pregnant women for gestation periods of 6 and 9 months based on software calculations and actual measurements. The ESD and fetal doses were estimated for a pregnant woman for gestation periods of 6 and 9 months during IVC‐F placement. For actual measurements, one pregnant model phantom was constructed using an anthropomorphic phantom, and two custom‐made different‐sized abdomen phantoms were used to simulate pregnancy. The custom‐made abdomen phantoms were constructed using polyurethane. For software calculations, the software utilized a set of anatomically realistic pregnant patient phantoms. The ESD estimated using the software was consistent with the measured ESD, but the fetal dose estimations were more complicated due to fetal positioning. During fetal dose evaluation using software calculations, the user must carefully consider how much of the fetal length is in the irradiation field to prevent underestimation or overestimation. Despite the errors, the software can assist the user in identifying the magnitude of the dose approaching critical limits. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9924124/ /pubmed/36546565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13884 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Protection & Regulations
Matsunaga, Yuta
Haba, Tomonobu
Kobayashi, Masanao
Suzuki, Shoichi
Asada, Yasuki
Chida, Koichi
Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software
title Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software
title_full Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software
title_fullStr Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software
title_short Evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: A comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software
title_sort evaluation of radiation dose for inferior vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: a comparison of dosimetry and dose calculation software
topic Radiation Protection & Regulations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36546565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13884
work_keys_str_mv AT matsunagayuta evaluationofradiationdoseforinferiorvenacavafilterplacementduringpregnancyacomparisonofdosimetryanddosecalculationsoftware
AT habatomonobu evaluationofradiationdoseforinferiorvenacavafilterplacementduringpregnancyacomparisonofdosimetryanddosecalculationsoftware
AT kobayashimasanao evaluationofradiationdoseforinferiorvenacavafilterplacementduringpregnancyacomparisonofdosimetryanddosecalculationsoftware
AT suzukishoichi evaluationofradiationdoseforinferiorvenacavafilterplacementduringpregnancyacomparisonofdosimetryanddosecalculationsoftware
AT asadayasuki evaluationofradiationdoseforinferiorvenacavafilterplacementduringpregnancyacomparisonofdosimetryanddosecalculationsoftware
AT chidakoichi evaluationofradiationdoseforinferiorvenacavafilterplacementduringpregnancyacomparisonofdosimetryanddosecalculationsoftware