Cargando…

Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhanapalan, Rishanthini, Pandjatcharam, Jagadesan, Saravanan, K., Patil, Ninad Harish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819474
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123975
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sessions of ICBT using tandem and ring applicator (Varian(©)), following completion of pelvic external beam radiotherapy treatment. The procedure was performed with vaginal balloon plus gauze packing or vaginal gauze packing alone, each of which was used in one of two sessions. Sequence of the type of vaginal packing was chosen with computer-generated block randomization. A HDR dose of 8.5 Gy was prescribed to point A in all patients. Volumetric dose parameters, such as D(0.1cc), D(0.5cc), D(1cc), and D(2cc) of the rectum and bladder were compared between the two techniques of vaginal packing. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 51 years. Majority (88%) of patients had locally advanced stages of cancer at baseline (stage IIB or more). Rectal doses were significantly less in combined packing technique (D(0.1cc): 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, p = 0.01; D(0.5cc): 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, p < 0.01; D(1cc): 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, p < 0.01; D(2cc): 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, p < 0.01). Bladder doses were higher in the combined packing technique (D(0.1cc): 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, p = 0.18; D(0.5cc): 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, p = 0.56; D(1cc): 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, p = 0.55; D(2cc): 7.56 vs. 7.33 Gy, p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Combined vaginal packing resulted in statistically significant reduction in rectal radiation dose compared with standard vaginal gauze packing in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix cancer using tandem and ring applicators.