Cargando…

Dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation

PURPOSE: This study quantified the dosimetric uncertainty caused by needle-tip detection errors in ultrasound images due to bevel-tip orientation differences, with respect to the location on template grid. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) system with physical template grid and 18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Zhengzheng, Arsenault, Theodore H., Traughber, Bryan, Ove, Roger, Podder, Tarun K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819470
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123978
_version_ 1784887836788391936
author Xu, Zhengzheng
Arsenault, Theodore H.
Traughber, Bryan
Ove, Roger
Podder, Tarun K.
author_facet Xu, Zhengzheng
Arsenault, Theodore H.
Traughber, Bryan
Ove, Roger
Podder, Tarun K.
author_sort Xu, Zhengzheng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study quantified the dosimetric uncertainty caused by needle-tip detection errors in ultrasound images due to bevel-tip orientation differences, with respect to the location on template grid. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) system with physical template grid and 18-gauge bevel-tip brachytherapy needles were used. TRUS was set at 6.5 MHz in water phantom, and measurements were taken with 50% and 100% B-mode TRUS gains. Needle-tip localization errors were then retrospectively applied back to 45 prostate seed implant plans to evaluate the important planning parameters for the prostate (D(90), V(100), V(150), and V(200)), urethra (D(10) and D(30)), and rectum (V(100), D(2cc), and D(0.1cc)), following the ABS and AAPM TG-137 guidelines. RESULTS: The needle-tip detection errors for 50% and 100% TRUS gains were 3.7 mm (max) and 5.2 mm (max), respectively. The observed significant decrease in prostate coverage (mean D(90) lower by 12.8%, and V(100) lower by 3.9% for smaller prostates) after seed placements were corrected by compensating the needle-tip detection errors. Apex of the prostate was hotter, and the base was cooler. Dosimetric difference for urethral and rectal parameters were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the beveled needle-tip orientation could considerably impact the needle tips detection accuracy, based on which the seeds might be delivered. These errors can lead to significant dosimetric uncertainty in prostate seed implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99241542023-02-16 Dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation Xu, Zhengzheng Arsenault, Theodore H. Traughber, Bryan Ove, Roger Podder, Tarun K. J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: This study quantified the dosimetric uncertainty caused by needle-tip detection errors in ultrasound images due to bevel-tip orientation differences, with respect to the location on template grid. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) system with physical template grid and 18-gauge bevel-tip brachytherapy needles were used. TRUS was set at 6.5 MHz in water phantom, and measurements were taken with 50% and 100% B-mode TRUS gains. Needle-tip localization errors were then retrospectively applied back to 45 prostate seed implant plans to evaluate the important planning parameters for the prostate (D(90), V(100), V(150), and V(200)), urethra (D(10) and D(30)), and rectum (V(100), D(2cc), and D(0.1cc)), following the ABS and AAPM TG-137 guidelines. RESULTS: The needle-tip detection errors for 50% and 100% TRUS gains were 3.7 mm (max) and 5.2 mm (max), respectively. The observed significant decrease in prostate coverage (mean D(90) lower by 12.8%, and V(100) lower by 3.9% for smaller prostates) after seed placements were corrected by compensating the needle-tip detection errors. Apex of the prostate was hotter, and the base was cooler. Dosimetric difference for urethral and rectal parameters were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the beveled needle-tip orientation could considerably impact the needle tips detection accuracy, based on which the seeds might be delivered. These errors can lead to significant dosimetric uncertainty in prostate seed implantation. Termedia Publishing House 2022-12-30 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9924154/ /pubmed/36819470 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123978 Text en Copyright © 2022 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Xu, Zhengzheng
Arsenault, Theodore H.
Traughber, Bryan
Ove, Roger
Podder, Tarun K.
Dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation
title Dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation
title_full Dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation
title_fullStr Dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation
title_full_unstemmed Dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation
title_short Dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation
title_sort dose uncertainty due to needle-tip localization error in prostate seed implantation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819470
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123978
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzhengzheng doseuncertaintyduetoneedletiplocalizationerrorinprostateseedimplantation
AT arsenaulttheodoreh doseuncertaintyduetoneedletiplocalizationerrorinprostateseedimplantation
AT traughberbryan doseuncertaintyduetoneedletiplocalizationerrorinprostateseedimplantation
AT overoger doseuncertaintyduetoneedletiplocalizationerrorinprostateseedimplantation
AT poddertarunk doseuncertaintyduetoneedletiplocalizationerrorinprostateseedimplantation