Cargando…

Applying the EPIS framework to policy-level considerations: Tobacco cessation policy implementation among California Medicaid managed care plans

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the California Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS) released an “All Plan Letter” (APL 16-014) to its Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) providing guidance on implementing tobacco-cessation coverage among Medicaid beneficiaries. However, implementation remains poor. We apply...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Economou, Melina A., Kaiser, Bonnie N., Yoeun, Sara W., Crable, Erika L., McMenamin, Sara B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895221096289
_version_ 1784887856906371072
author Economou, Melina A.
Kaiser, Bonnie N.
Yoeun, Sara W.
Crable, Erika L.
McMenamin, Sara B.
author_facet Economou, Melina A.
Kaiser, Bonnie N.
Yoeun, Sara W.
Crable, Erika L.
McMenamin, Sara B.
author_sort Economou, Melina A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2016, the California Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS) released an “All Plan Letter” (APL 16-014) to its Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) providing guidance on implementing tobacco-cessation coverage among Medicaid beneficiaries. However, implementation remains poor. We apply the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to identify barriers and facilitators to fidelity to APL 16-014 across California Medicaid MCPs. METHODS: We assessed fidelity through semi-structured interviews with MCP health educators (N = 24). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and reviewed to develop initial themes regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation. Initial thematic summaries were discussed and mapped onto EPIS constructs. RESULTS: The APL (Innovation) was described as lacking clarity and specificity in its guidelines, hindering implementation. Related to the Inner Context, MCPs described the APL as beyond the scope of their resources, pointing to their own lack of educational materials, human resources, and poor technological infrastructure as implementation barriers. In the Outer Context, MCPs identified a lack of incentives for providers and beneficiaries to offer and participate in tobacco-cessation programs, respectively. A lack of communication, educational materials, and training resources between the state and MCPs (missing Bridging Factors) were barriers to preventing MCPs from identifying smoking rates or gauging success of tobacco-cessation efforts. Facilitators included several MCPs collaborating with each other and using external resources to promote tobacco cessation. Additionally, a few MCPs used fidelity monitoring staff as Bridging Factors to facilitate provider training, track providers’ identification of smokers, and follow-up with beneficiaries participating in tobacco-cessation programs. CONCLUSIONS: The release of the evidence-based APL 16-014 by California's DHCS was an important step forward in promoting tobacco-cessation services for Medicaid MCP beneficiaries. Improved communication on implementation in different environments and improved Bridging Factors such as incentives for providers and patients are needed to fully realize policy goals. PLAN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In 2016, the California Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS) in California released an “All Plan Letter” (APL 16-014) to its Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) providing guidance on implementing tobacco-cessation coverage to address tobacco use among Medicaid beneficiaries. We conducted semi-structured interviews with health educators in California Medicaid MCPs to explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing the APL using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. According to MCPs, barriers included a lack of clarity in the APL guidelines; a lack of resources, including educational materials, infrastructure to identify smokers, and human resources; and a lack of incentives or penalties for providers to provide tobacco-cessation materials to beneficiaries. Facilitators included collaboration between MCPs and state and/or national public health programs. Overall, our findings can provide avenues for improving the implementation of tobacco-cessation services within Medicaid MCPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99242442023-04-20 Applying the EPIS framework to policy-level considerations: Tobacco cessation policy implementation among California Medicaid managed care plans Economou, Melina A. Kaiser, Bonnie N. Yoeun, Sara W. Crable, Erika L. McMenamin, Sara B. Implement Res Pract Practical Implementation Report BACKGROUND: In 2016, the California Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS) released an “All Plan Letter” (APL 16-014) to its Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) providing guidance on implementing tobacco-cessation coverage among Medicaid beneficiaries. However, implementation remains poor. We apply the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework to identify barriers and facilitators to fidelity to APL 16-014 across California Medicaid MCPs. METHODS: We assessed fidelity through semi-structured interviews with MCP health educators (N = 24). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and reviewed to develop initial themes regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation. Initial thematic summaries were discussed and mapped onto EPIS constructs. RESULTS: The APL (Innovation) was described as lacking clarity and specificity in its guidelines, hindering implementation. Related to the Inner Context, MCPs described the APL as beyond the scope of their resources, pointing to their own lack of educational materials, human resources, and poor technological infrastructure as implementation barriers. In the Outer Context, MCPs identified a lack of incentives for providers and beneficiaries to offer and participate in tobacco-cessation programs, respectively. A lack of communication, educational materials, and training resources between the state and MCPs (missing Bridging Factors) were barriers to preventing MCPs from identifying smoking rates or gauging success of tobacco-cessation efforts. Facilitators included several MCPs collaborating with each other and using external resources to promote tobacco cessation. Additionally, a few MCPs used fidelity monitoring staff as Bridging Factors to facilitate provider training, track providers’ identification of smokers, and follow-up with beneficiaries participating in tobacco-cessation programs. CONCLUSIONS: The release of the evidence-based APL 16-014 by California's DHCS was an important step forward in promoting tobacco-cessation services for Medicaid MCP beneficiaries. Improved communication on implementation in different environments and improved Bridging Factors such as incentives for providers and patients are needed to fully realize policy goals. PLAN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In 2016, the California Department of Healthcare Services (DHCS) in California released an “All Plan Letter” (APL 16-014) to its Medicaid managed care plans (MCPs) providing guidance on implementing tobacco-cessation coverage to address tobacco use among Medicaid beneficiaries. We conducted semi-structured interviews with health educators in California Medicaid MCPs to explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing the APL using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. According to MCPs, barriers included a lack of clarity in the APL guidelines; a lack of resources, including educational materials, infrastructure to identify smokers, and human resources; and a lack of incentives or penalties for providers to provide tobacco-cessation materials to beneficiaries. Facilitators included collaboration between MCPs and state and/or national public health programs. Overall, our findings can provide avenues for improving the implementation of tobacco-cessation services within Medicaid MCPs. SAGE Publications 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9924244/ /pubmed/37091072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895221096289 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Practical Implementation Report
Economou, Melina A.
Kaiser, Bonnie N.
Yoeun, Sara W.
Crable, Erika L.
McMenamin, Sara B.
Applying the EPIS framework to policy-level considerations: Tobacco cessation policy implementation among California Medicaid managed care plans
title Applying the EPIS framework to policy-level considerations: Tobacco cessation policy implementation among California Medicaid managed care plans
title_full Applying the EPIS framework to policy-level considerations: Tobacco cessation policy implementation among California Medicaid managed care plans
title_fullStr Applying the EPIS framework to policy-level considerations: Tobacco cessation policy implementation among California Medicaid managed care plans
title_full_unstemmed Applying the EPIS framework to policy-level considerations: Tobacco cessation policy implementation among California Medicaid managed care plans
title_short Applying the EPIS framework to policy-level considerations: Tobacco cessation policy implementation among California Medicaid managed care plans
title_sort applying the epis framework to policy-level considerations: tobacco cessation policy implementation among california medicaid managed care plans
topic Practical Implementation Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26334895221096289
work_keys_str_mv AT economoumelinaa applyingtheepisframeworktopolicylevelconsiderationstobaccocessationpolicyimplementationamongcaliforniamedicaidmanagedcareplans
AT kaiserbonnien applyingtheepisframeworktopolicylevelconsiderationstobaccocessationpolicyimplementationamongcaliforniamedicaidmanagedcareplans
AT yoeunsaraw applyingtheepisframeworktopolicylevelconsiderationstobaccocessationpolicyimplementationamongcaliforniamedicaidmanagedcareplans
AT crableerikal applyingtheepisframeworktopolicylevelconsiderationstobaccocessationpolicyimplementationamongcaliforniamedicaidmanagedcareplans
AT mcmenaminsarab applyingtheepisframeworktopolicylevelconsiderationstobaccocessationpolicyimplementationamongcaliforniamedicaidmanagedcareplans