Cargando…

Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) Versus Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Regimen as First Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, a Prospective Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still unsatisfactory. Several trials approved that, the upfront treatment with triplet regimen included fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic disease as co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khali, Khaled Ahmed, Musalm, Hanan Selim, Hassan, Mohamed Abdulla, Mahmoud, Inas Abdou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308367
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.10.3421
_version_ 1784887879123599360
author Khali, Khaled Ahmed
Musalm, Hanan Selim
Hassan, Mohamed Abdulla
Mahmoud, Inas Abdou
author_facet Khali, Khaled Ahmed
Musalm, Hanan Selim
Hassan, Mohamed Abdulla
Mahmoud, Inas Abdou
author_sort Khali, Khaled Ahmed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The outcomes of treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still unsatisfactory. Several trials approved that, the upfront treatment with triplet regimen included fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic disease as compared to standard doublet regimen. The objective of our study is evaluating the impact of upfront treatment with triplet (FOLFOXIRI) regimen on both oncological outcomes (response rate and survival) and patients’ tolerability in comparison to the standard doublet regimen. METHODS: We randomly enrolled 64 patients with a newly diagnosed unresectable mCRC to receive either FOLFOXIRI (experimental arm) or FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 (control arm) biweekly up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoints are overall response rate (RR) and patients’ tolerability. The secondary endpoints are the progression free and overall survival. RESULT: There was a significantly increase in RR (59% vs 37%) and complete remission rate (CR) (6.3% and 3.1%, respectively (P = 0.045) for the triplet therapy group compared to control group. Consequently, an increased rate of secondary resection of metastasis (21.9% vs 3.1% respectively; P=0.023). The FOLFOXIRI regimen was associated with higher rate of grade 3/4 toxicity but not statistically significant except febrile neutropenia (6.2%; P=0.03). There was numerical prolongation in the median PFS in the FOLFOXIRI group on compared to control group but not significantly (9 versus 8 months; P=0.11). The median OS was 20 and 22 months in FOLFOXIRI arm and control arm respectively with no statistically significant difference (P=0.57). CONCLUSION: FOLFOXIRI had a higher efficacy and higher conversion rate to secondary resection over the doublet regimen as an upfront treatment option, coupled with a manageable adverse event, but failed to improve the survival outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99243512023-02-16 Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) Versus Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Regimen as First Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, a Prospective Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial Khali, Khaled Ahmed Musalm, Hanan Selim Hassan, Mohamed Abdulla Mahmoud, Inas Abdou Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: The outcomes of treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still unsatisfactory. Several trials approved that, the upfront treatment with triplet regimen included fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic disease as compared to standard doublet regimen. The objective of our study is evaluating the impact of upfront treatment with triplet (FOLFOXIRI) regimen on both oncological outcomes (response rate and survival) and patients’ tolerability in comparison to the standard doublet regimen. METHODS: We randomly enrolled 64 patients with a newly diagnosed unresectable mCRC to receive either FOLFOXIRI (experimental arm) or FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 (control arm) biweekly up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoints are overall response rate (RR) and patients’ tolerability. The secondary endpoints are the progression free and overall survival. RESULT: There was a significantly increase in RR (59% vs 37%) and complete remission rate (CR) (6.3% and 3.1%, respectively (P = 0.045) for the triplet therapy group compared to control group. Consequently, an increased rate of secondary resection of metastasis (21.9% vs 3.1% respectively; P=0.023). The FOLFOXIRI regimen was associated with higher rate of grade 3/4 toxicity but not statistically significant except febrile neutropenia (6.2%; P=0.03). There was numerical prolongation in the median PFS in the FOLFOXIRI group on compared to control group but not significantly (9 versus 8 months; P=0.11). The median OS was 20 and 22 months in FOLFOXIRI arm and control arm respectively with no statistically significant difference (P=0.57). CONCLUSION: FOLFOXIRI had a higher efficacy and higher conversion rate to secondary resection over the doublet regimen as an upfront treatment option, coupled with a manageable adverse event, but failed to improve the survival outcomes. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9924351/ /pubmed/36308367 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.10.3421 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Khali, Khaled Ahmed
Musalm, Hanan Selim
Hassan, Mohamed Abdulla
Mahmoud, Inas Abdou
Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) Versus Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Regimen as First Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, a Prospective Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial
title Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) Versus Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Regimen as First Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, a Prospective Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) Versus Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Regimen as First Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, a Prospective Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) Versus Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Regimen as First Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, a Prospective Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) Versus Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Regimen as First Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, a Prospective Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) Versus Doublet (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) Regimen as First Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma, a Prospective Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort triplet (folfoxiri) versus doublet (folfox or folfiri) regimen as first line treatment in metastatic colorectal carcinoma, a prospective phase ii, randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308367
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.10.3421
work_keys_str_mv AT khalikhaledahmed tripletfolfoxiriversusdoubletfolfoxorfolfiriregimenasfirstlinetreatmentinmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomaaprospectivephaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT musalmhananselim tripletfolfoxiriversusdoubletfolfoxorfolfiriregimenasfirstlinetreatmentinmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomaaprospectivephaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hassanmohamedabdulla tripletfolfoxiriversusdoubletfolfoxorfolfiriregimenasfirstlinetreatmentinmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomaaprospectivephaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mahmoudinasabdou tripletfolfoxiriversusdoubletfolfoxorfolfiriregimenasfirstlinetreatmentinmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomaaprospectivephaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial