Cargando…

The reliability of the scapular posture and scapular dyskinesis tests in rugby union players

BACKGROUND: Impact forces during rugby can contribute to scapula dysfunction and shoulder pain. Reliable assessment of static and dynamic scapula position is paramount in managing athletes with, and those at risk of developing, shoulder pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of static scapul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, V, Stokes, K, Trewartha, G, Mckay, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: South African Sports Medicine Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816888
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2021/v33i1a11674
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Impact forces during rugby can contribute to scapula dysfunction and shoulder pain. Reliable assessment of static and dynamic scapula position is paramount in managing athletes with, and those at risk of developing, shoulder pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of static scapular posture (SP), clavicular tilt angle (CTA) and the scapular dyskinesis (SD) assessments by expert and student therapists. METHODS: The study design was an inter-rater and intra-rater reliability study in male university level rugby union players. Four sport rehabilitation students and one experienced physiotherapist evaluated the position of the scapular and clavicle of male university-level rugby union players (inter-rater participants: session 1: n=17, session 2: n=12 and session 3: n=16; (intra-rater participants: n = 12). Participants attended 3 testing sessions, each 1 week apart. Scapular orientation and motion were assessed in five planes of movement and using the Scapular Dyskinesis Test (SDT) respectively. The inter-rater analysis included all participants from each session, while in the intra-rater analysis included only the 12 participants who attended all three testing sessions. RESULTS: Kappa coefficient values and percentage agreement ratings for students compared to the experienced therapist were: SP=poor to fair (−0.01 to 0.33), (27% – 94%); SDT=slight (0.16; 41%); CTA=fair (0.21; 59%). Test-retest (intra-rater) agreement was fair to moderate (0.22 – 0.44; 69% – 95%), slight (0.12; 47%), and fair (0.39; 77%) for the SP, SDT, and CTA, respectively. CONCLUSION: Static and dynamic evaluation of the shoulder by students and an experienced therapist has poor to moderate reliability and should not be used to make clinical decisions based on observation alone.