Cargando…

Blood flow restriction training in South Africa – a panel discussion

BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training uses a cuff to partially occlude venous blood flow and improve musculoskeletal training outcomes. Over the past 25 years, numerous studies have demonstrated its relative safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: Blood flow restriction training is under review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, RW, Ganda, J, van Schalkwyk, L, Fabricius, DL, Cornelissen, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: South African Sports Medicine Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36815908
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a14796
_version_ 1784887894024912896
author Evans, RW
Ganda, J
van Schalkwyk, L
Fabricius, DL
Cornelissen, M
author_facet Evans, RW
Ganda, J
van Schalkwyk, L
Fabricius, DL
Cornelissen, M
author_sort Evans, RW
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training uses a cuff to partially occlude venous blood flow and improve musculoskeletal training outcomes. Over the past 25 years, numerous studies have demonstrated its relative safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: Blood flow restriction training is under review by the Health Professions Council of South Africa due to safety and ethical concerns. The objective of this roundtable discussion is to gain better insight into the current use and perception of blood flow restriction training in South Africa. FORMATION OF PANEL: The expert panel had experience with the use of BFR training and included one representative from each of the following professions, namely, sports medicine, physiotherapy and biokinetics. DISCUSSION: The panellists provided their unique perspectives on BFR training, whilst reaching a relative consensus on its safety, screening, efficacy, and appropriate use. Agreement on appropriate loading and occlusion pressure protocols during different phases of rehabilitation was less clear. CONCLUSION: Although BFR is a safe and effective modality, the development of evidence-based protocols among different health professionals in South Africa is required to ensure good clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher South African Sports Medicine Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99245362023-02-16 Blood flow restriction training in South Africa – a panel discussion Evans, RW Ganda, J van Schalkwyk, L Fabricius, DL Cornelissen, M S Afr J Sports Med Panel Discussion BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training uses a cuff to partially occlude venous blood flow and improve musculoskeletal training outcomes. Over the past 25 years, numerous studies have demonstrated its relative safety and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: Blood flow restriction training is under review by the Health Professions Council of South Africa due to safety and ethical concerns. The objective of this roundtable discussion is to gain better insight into the current use and perception of blood flow restriction training in South Africa. FORMATION OF PANEL: The expert panel had experience with the use of BFR training and included one representative from each of the following professions, namely, sports medicine, physiotherapy and biokinetics. DISCUSSION: The panellists provided their unique perspectives on BFR training, whilst reaching a relative consensus on its safety, screening, efficacy, and appropriate use. Agreement on appropriate loading and occlusion pressure protocols during different phases of rehabilitation was less clear. CONCLUSION: Although BFR is a safe and effective modality, the development of evidence-based protocols among different health professionals in South Africa is required to ensure good clinical practice. South African Sports Medicine Association 2022-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9924536/ /pubmed/36815908 http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a14796 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Panel Discussion
Evans, RW
Ganda, J
van Schalkwyk, L
Fabricius, DL
Cornelissen, M
Blood flow restriction training in South Africa – a panel discussion
title Blood flow restriction training in South Africa – a panel discussion
title_full Blood flow restriction training in South Africa – a panel discussion
title_fullStr Blood flow restriction training in South Africa – a panel discussion
title_full_unstemmed Blood flow restriction training in South Africa – a panel discussion
title_short Blood flow restriction training in South Africa – a panel discussion
title_sort blood flow restriction training in south africa – a panel discussion
topic Panel Discussion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36815908
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a14796
work_keys_str_mv AT evansrw bloodflowrestrictiontraininginsouthafricaapaneldiscussion
AT gandaj bloodflowrestrictiontraininginsouthafricaapaneldiscussion
AT vanschalkwykl bloodflowrestrictiontraininginsouthafricaapaneldiscussion
AT fabriciusdl bloodflowrestrictiontraininginsouthafricaapaneldiscussion
AT cornelissenm bloodflowrestrictiontraininginsouthafricaapaneldiscussion