Cargando…

The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The online intervention Runfitcheck was developed to stimulate injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Runfitcheck on injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kemler, E, Cornelissen, MH, Gouttebarge, V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: South African Sports Medicine Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816902
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2021/v33i1a11297
_version_ 1784887896154570752
author Kemler, E
Cornelissen, MH
Gouttebarge, V
author_facet Kemler, E
Cornelissen, MH
Gouttebarge, V
author_sort Kemler, E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The online intervention Runfitcheck was developed to stimulate injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Runfitcheck on injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was conducted among adult novice runners. The intervention group had access to the Runfitcheck intervention, the control group performed their running activities as usual. One, three, and five months after enrolment, participants reported retrospectively what they had done regarding injury-preventive behaviour (operationalised as (i) using a (personalised) training schedule; (ii) performing strength and technique exercises; and (iii) performing a warm-up routine prior to running). Relative Risks (RR) and 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were used to analyse behavioural change. RESULTS: The intervention group (n=715) searched more often for information about a warm-up routine (RR 1.211; 95%CI 1.080–1.357), and added more often strength exercises to their warm-up routine (RR 1.228; 95%CI 1.092–1.380). The intervention group performed more often running technique exercises compared to the control group (n=696) (RR 1.134; 95%CI 1.015–1.267), but less often strength exercises (RR 0.865 (95%CI 0.752–0.995). Within the group of runners that did not perform any warm-up routine at enrolment (n=272), the intervention group started to perform a regular warm-up routine more often than the control group (RR 1.461; 95%CI 1.084–1.968). No significant results were found for using a training schedule. CONCLUSION: The online intervention Runfitcheck was effective in stimulating aspects of injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners, mostly related to a warm-up routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL6225, Registered April 24(th) 2007 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6225
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher South African Sports Medicine Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99245452023-02-16 The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial Kemler, E Cornelissen, MH Gouttebarge, V S Afr J Sports Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The online intervention Runfitcheck was developed to stimulate injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Runfitcheck on injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was conducted among adult novice runners. The intervention group had access to the Runfitcheck intervention, the control group performed their running activities as usual. One, three, and five months after enrolment, participants reported retrospectively what they had done regarding injury-preventive behaviour (operationalised as (i) using a (personalised) training schedule; (ii) performing strength and technique exercises; and (iii) performing a warm-up routine prior to running). Relative Risks (RR) and 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were used to analyse behavioural change. RESULTS: The intervention group (n=715) searched more often for information about a warm-up routine (RR 1.211; 95%CI 1.080–1.357), and added more often strength exercises to their warm-up routine (RR 1.228; 95%CI 1.092–1.380). The intervention group performed more often running technique exercises compared to the control group (n=696) (RR 1.134; 95%CI 1.015–1.267), but less often strength exercises (RR 0.865 (95%CI 0.752–0.995). Within the group of runners that did not perform any warm-up routine at enrolment (n=272), the intervention group started to perform a regular warm-up routine more often than the control group (RR 1.461; 95%CI 1.084–1.968). No significant results were found for using a training schedule. CONCLUSION: The online intervention Runfitcheck was effective in stimulating aspects of injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners, mostly related to a warm-up routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL6225, Registered April 24(th) 2007 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6225 South African Sports Medicine Association 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9924545/ /pubmed/36816902 http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2021/v33i1a11297 Text en Copyright © 2021 South African Journal of Sports Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kemler, E
Cornelissen, MH
Gouttebarge, V
The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial
title The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: results of a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816902
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2021/v33i1a11297
work_keys_str_mv AT kemlere theeffectivenessofanonlineinterventioninstimulatinginjurypreventivebehaviourinadultnovicerunnersresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cornelissenmh theeffectivenessofanonlineinterventioninstimulatinginjurypreventivebehaviourinadultnovicerunnersresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gouttebargev theeffectivenessofanonlineinterventioninstimulatinginjurypreventivebehaviourinadultnovicerunnersresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kemlere effectivenessofanonlineinterventioninstimulatinginjurypreventivebehaviourinadultnovicerunnersresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cornelissenmh effectivenessofanonlineinterventioninstimulatinginjurypreventivebehaviourinadultnovicerunnersresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gouttebargev effectivenessofanonlineinterventioninstimulatinginjurypreventivebehaviourinadultnovicerunnersresultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial