Visual Inspection for Lower Limb Malalignment Diagnosis Is Unreliable

OBJECTIVE: Visual inspection of the lower limb is often part of standard clinical practice during a physical examination at the outpatient clinic. This study aims to investigate how reliable visual inspections are in terms of detecting lower limb malalignments without additional tools and physical examinations. DESIGN: This study enrolled 50 patients. Each patient underwent a whole leg radiograph (WLR); in addition, a standardized digital photograph was taken of the lower limbs. Four persons (different experience levels) visually rated the digital photograph twice (unaware of the hip knee angle [HKA] on the WLR) and placed them in the category: severe valgus (>5°); moderate valgus (2°-5°); neutral, moderate varus (2°-5°); and severe varus (>5°). Visual ratings were compared with the measured HKA on WLRs for correlation using Spearman’s rho. Linear ordinal regression models with significance when P < 0.05 were used to test whether body mass index (BMI), age, gender, and HKA were possible risk factors for incorrect visual HKA assessment. RESULTS: Spearman’s rho between the visual assessment and measured HKA on the WLR was moderate with 0.478 (P < 0.01). Women had an increased odds ratio of 3.7 (P = 0.001) for incorrect visual assessment. Higher HKA also increased the odds ratio for erroneous visual assessment with 1.4 (P = 0.003). BMI and age did not significantly increase the odds of erroneous visual leg axis assessments in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Visual assessment of the lower limb alignment does not provide clinically relevant information. Lower limb malalignment diagnoses cannot be performed using only a visual inspection. Physical examination tests and radiographical assessments are advised. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level II