Cargando…

Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is characterised by dysregulated, life-threatening immune responses, which are thought to be driven by cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6). Genetic variants in IL6R known to down-regulate IL-6 signalling are associated with improved Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamilton, Fergus W., Thomas, Matt, Arnold, David, Palmer, Tom, Moran, Ed, Mentzer, Alexander J., Maskell, Nick, Baillie, Kenneth, Summers, Charlotte, Hingorani, Aroon, MacGowan, Alasdair, Khandaker, Golam M., Mitchell, Ruth, Davey Smith, George, Ghazal, Peter, Timpson, Nicholas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36716318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004174
_version_ 1784887989050015744
author Hamilton, Fergus W.
Thomas, Matt
Arnold, David
Palmer, Tom
Moran, Ed
Mentzer, Alexander J.
Maskell, Nick
Baillie, Kenneth
Summers, Charlotte
Hingorani, Aroon
MacGowan, Alasdair
Khandaker, Golam M.
Mitchell, Ruth
Davey Smith, George
Ghazal, Peter
Timpson, Nicholas J.
author_facet Hamilton, Fergus W.
Thomas, Matt
Arnold, David
Palmer, Tom
Moran, Ed
Mentzer, Alexander J.
Maskell, Nick
Baillie, Kenneth
Summers, Charlotte
Hingorani, Aroon
MacGowan, Alasdair
Khandaker, Golam M.
Mitchell, Ruth
Davey Smith, George
Ghazal, Peter
Timpson, Nicholas J.
author_sort Hamilton, Fergus W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sepsis is characterised by dysregulated, life-threatening immune responses, which are thought to be driven by cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6). Genetic variants in IL6R known to down-regulate IL-6 signalling are associated with improved Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, a finding later confirmed in randomised trials of IL-6 receptor antagonists (IL6RAs). We hypothesised that blockade of IL6R could also improve outcomes in sepsis. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in and near IL6R to evaluate the likely causal effects of IL6R blockade on sepsis (primary outcome), sepsis severity, other infections, and COVID-19 (secondary outcomes). We weighted SNPs by their effect on CRP and combined results across them in inverse variance weighted meta-analysis, proxying the effect of IL6RA. Our outcomes were measured in UK Biobank, FinnGen, the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI), and the GenOSept and GainS consortium. We performed several sensitivity analyses to test assumptions of our methods, including utilising variants around CRP and gp130 in a similar analysis. In the UK Biobank cohort (N = 486,484, including 11,643 with sepsis), IL6R blockade was associated with a decreased risk of our primary outcome, sepsis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.96, per unit of natural log-transformed CRP decrease). The size of this effect increased with severity, with larger effects on 28-day sepsis mortality (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.15); critical care admission with sepsis (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.78) and critical care death with sepsis (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.98). Similar associations were seen with severe respiratory infection: OR for pneumonia in critical care 0.69 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.97) and for sepsis survival in critical care (OR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.04 to 1.31) in the GainS and GenOSept consortium, although this result had a large degree of imprecision. We also confirm the previously reported protective effect of IL6R blockade on severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84) in the COVID-19 HGI, which was of similar magnitude to that seen in sepsis. Sensitivity analyses did not alter our primary results. These results are subject to the limitations and assumptions of MR, which in this case reflects interpretation of these SNP effects as causally acting through blockade of IL6R, and reflect lifetime exposure to IL6R blockade, rather than the effect of therapeutic IL6R blockade. CONCLUSIONS: IL6R blockade is causally associated with reduced incidence of sepsis. Similar but imprecisely estimated results supported a causal effect also on sepsis related mortality and critical care admission with sepsis. These effects are comparable in size to the effect seen in severe COVID-19, where IL-6 receptor antagonists were shown to improve survival. These data suggest that a randomised trial of IL-6 receptor antagonists in sepsis should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99250692023-02-14 Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study Hamilton, Fergus W. Thomas, Matt Arnold, David Palmer, Tom Moran, Ed Mentzer, Alexander J. Maskell, Nick Baillie, Kenneth Summers, Charlotte Hingorani, Aroon MacGowan, Alasdair Khandaker, Golam M. Mitchell, Ruth Davey Smith, George Ghazal, Peter Timpson, Nicholas J. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Sepsis is characterised by dysregulated, life-threatening immune responses, which are thought to be driven by cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6). Genetic variants in IL6R known to down-regulate IL-6 signalling are associated with improved Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, a finding later confirmed in randomised trials of IL-6 receptor antagonists (IL6RAs). We hypothesised that blockade of IL6R could also improve outcomes in sepsis. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in and near IL6R to evaluate the likely causal effects of IL6R blockade on sepsis (primary outcome), sepsis severity, other infections, and COVID-19 (secondary outcomes). We weighted SNPs by their effect on CRP and combined results across them in inverse variance weighted meta-analysis, proxying the effect of IL6RA. Our outcomes were measured in UK Biobank, FinnGen, the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI), and the GenOSept and GainS consortium. We performed several sensitivity analyses to test assumptions of our methods, including utilising variants around CRP and gp130 in a similar analysis. In the UK Biobank cohort (N = 486,484, including 11,643 with sepsis), IL6R blockade was associated with a decreased risk of our primary outcome, sepsis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.96, per unit of natural log-transformed CRP decrease). The size of this effect increased with severity, with larger effects on 28-day sepsis mortality (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.15); critical care admission with sepsis (OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.78) and critical care death with sepsis (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.98). Similar associations were seen with severe respiratory infection: OR for pneumonia in critical care 0.69 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.97) and for sepsis survival in critical care (OR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.04 to 1.31) in the GainS and GenOSept consortium, although this result had a large degree of imprecision. We also confirm the previously reported protective effect of IL6R blockade on severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84) in the COVID-19 HGI, which was of similar magnitude to that seen in sepsis. Sensitivity analyses did not alter our primary results. These results are subject to the limitations and assumptions of MR, which in this case reflects interpretation of these SNP effects as causally acting through blockade of IL6R, and reflect lifetime exposure to IL6R blockade, rather than the effect of therapeutic IL6R blockade. CONCLUSIONS: IL6R blockade is causally associated with reduced incidence of sepsis. Similar but imprecisely estimated results supported a causal effect also on sepsis related mortality and critical care admission with sepsis. These effects are comparable in size to the effect seen in severe COVID-19, where IL-6 receptor antagonists were shown to improve survival. These data suggest that a randomised trial of IL-6 receptor antagonists in sepsis should be considered. Public Library of Science 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9925069/ /pubmed/36716318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004174 Text en © 2023 Hamilton et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hamilton, Fergus W.
Thomas, Matt
Arnold, David
Palmer, Tom
Moran, Ed
Mentzer, Alexander J.
Maskell, Nick
Baillie, Kenneth
Summers, Charlotte
Hingorani, Aroon
MacGowan, Alasdair
Khandaker, Golam M.
Mitchell, Ruth
Davey Smith, George
Ghazal, Peter
Timpson, Nicholas J.
Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study
title Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study
title_full Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study
title_fullStr Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study
title_short Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: A Mendelian randomisation study
title_sort therapeutic potential of il6r blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death: a mendelian randomisation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36716318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004174
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltonfergusw therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT thomasmatt therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT arnolddavid therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT palmertom therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT moraned therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT mentzeralexanderj therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT maskellnick therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT bailliekenneth therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT summerscharlotte therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT hingoraniaroon therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT macgowanalasdair therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT khandakergolamm therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT mitchellruth therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT daveysmithgeorge therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT ghazalpeter therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy
AT timpsonnicholasj therapeuticpotentialofil6rblockadeforthetreatmentofsepsisandsepsisrelateddeathamendelianrandomisationstudy