Cargando…

Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting

PURPOSE: Evaluate concordance of provider practices with clinical guidelines for thrombectomy screening in an emergency department (ED) via computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted for patients 18 years or older who received a C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zahn, Cal D., Smith, Hayden L., Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R., Craig, Steve R., Hawthorne, Clint R., Hansen, Calvin J., Holdsworth, Ryan, Justo-Roth, Suzie M., Kluesner, Nicholas H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x
_version_ 1784888051136200704
author Zahn, Cal D.
Smith, Hayden L.
Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R.
Craig, Steve R.
Hawthorne, Clint R.
Hansen, Calvin J.
Holdsworth, Ryan
Justo-Roth, Suzie M.
Kluesner, Nicholas H.
author_facet Zahn, Cal D.
Smith, Hayden L.
Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R.
Craig, Steve R.
Hawthorne, Clint R.
Hansen, Calvin J.
Holdsworth, Ryan
Justo-Roth, Suzie M.
Kluesner, Nicholas H.
author_sort Zahn, Cal D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evaluate concordance of provider practices with clinical guidelines for thrombectomy screening in an emergency department (ED) via computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted for patients 18 years or older who received a CT-P/A of the head and neck in a US Midwestern ED between September 2019 through June 2021. Healthcare system records reviewed for patient information, CT-P/A findings, and treatment decisions. RESULTS: During study period, 68,403 patients presented to the ED with 718 (1.1%) receiving a CT-P/A. Of these patients, 105 (14.6%) were transferred to a regional facility for potential thrombectomy, with 74 (70.5%) receiving procedure, 28 (26.7%) not receiving procedure, and 3 (2.9%) with insufficient follow-up information. Of patients receiving CT-P/A, 23 met DAWN criteria for thrombectomy, with 21 (91.3%) transferred for potential thrombectomy and 20 (95.2%) receiving the procedure; in comparison, 81 patients (11.7%) did not meet all DAWN criteria and were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 52 (64.2%) receiving procedure. Lastly, 55 patients met DEFUSE-3 criteria for thrombectomy with 49 (89.1%) being transferred for potential thrombectomy and 45 (91.8%) receiving procedure. In comparison, 53 patients who did not meet all DEFUSE-3 criteria were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 27 (50.9%) receiving procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to understand CT-P/A usage, especially in patients that fall outside of treatment criteria in the current thrombectomy literature. Results may have value to institutions interested in using CT-P/A as a diagnostic tool as well as institutions already incorporating it in stroke assessments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99253602023-02-14 Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting Zahn, Cal D. Smith, Hayden L. Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R. Craig, Steve R. Hawthorne, Clint R. Hansen, Calvin J. Holdsworth, Ryan Justo-Roth, Suzie M. Kluesner, Nicholas H. Emerg Radiol Original Article PURPOSE: Evaluate concordance of provider practices with clinical guidelines for thrombectomy screening in an emergency department (ED) via computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted for patients 18 years or older who received a CT-P/A of the head and neck in a US Midwestern ED between September 2019 through June 2021. Healthcare system records reviewed for patient information, CT-P/A findings, and treatment decisions. RESULTS: During study period, 68,403 patients presented to the ED with 718 (1.1%) receiving a CT-P/A. Of these patients, 105 (14.6%) were transferred to a regional facility for potential thrombectomy, with 74 (70.5%) receiving procedure, 28 (26.7%) not receiving procedure, and 3 (2.9%) with insufficient follow-up information. Of patients receiving CT-P/A, 23 met DAWN criteria for thrombectomy, with 21 (91.3%) transferred for potential thrombectomy and 20 (95.2%) receiving the procedure; in comparison, 81 patients (11.7%) did not meet all DAWN criteria and were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 52 (64.2%) receiving procedure. Lastly, 55 patients met DEFUSE-3 criteria for thrombectomy with 49 (89.1%) being transferred for potential thrombectomy and 45 (91.8%) receiving procedure. In comparison, 53 patients who did not meet all DEFUSE-3 criteria were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 27 (50.9%) receiving procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to understand CT-P/A usage, especially in patients that fall outside of treatment criteria in the current thrombectomy literature. Results may have value to institutions interested in using CT-P/A as a diagnostic tool as well as institutions already incorporating it in stroke assessments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925360/ /pubmed/36781817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zahn, Cal D.
Smith, Hayden L.
Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R.
Craig, Steve R.
Hawthorne, Clint R.
Hansen, Calvin J.
Holdsworth, Ryan
Justo-Roth, Suzie M.
Kluesner, Nicholas H.
Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting
title Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting
title_full Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting
title_fullStr Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting
title_short Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting
title_sort evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zahncald evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting
AT smithhaydenl evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting
AT hurdelbrinkjonathanr evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting
AT craigstever evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting
AT hawthorneclintr evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting
AT hansencalvinj evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting
AT holdsworthryan evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting
AT justorothsuziem evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting
AT kluesnernicholash evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting