Cargando…
Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting
PURPOSE: Evaluate concordance of provider practices with clinical guidelines for thrombectomy screening in an emergency department (ED) via computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted for patients 18 years or older who received a C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x |
_version_ | 1784888051136200704 |
---|---|
author | Zahn, Cal D. Smith, Hayden L. Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R. Craig, Steve R. Hawthorne, Clint R. Hansen, Calvin J. Holdsworth, Ryan Justo-Roth, Suzie M. Kluesner, Nicholas H. |
author_facet | Zahn, Cal D. Smith, Hayden L. Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R. Craig, Steve R. Hawthorne, Clint R. Hansen, Calvin J. Holdsworth, Ryan Justo-Roth, Suzie M. Kluesner, Nicholas H. |
author_sort | Zahn, Cal D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Evaluate concordance of provider practices with clinical guidelines for thrombectomy screening in an emergency department (ED) via computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted for patients 18 years or older who received a CT-P/A of the head and neck in a US Midwestern ED between September 2019 through June 2021. Healthcare system records reviewed for patient information, CT-P/A findings, and treatment decisions. RESULTS: During study period, 68,403 patients presented to the ED with 718 (1.1%) receiving a CT-P/A. Of these patients, 105 (14.6%) were transferred to a regional facility for potential thrombectomy, with 74 (70.5%) receiving procedure, 28 (26.7%) not receiving procedure, and 3 (2.9%) with insufficient follow-up information. Of patients receiving CT-P/A, 23 met DAWN criteria for thrombectomy, with 21 (91.3%) transferred for potential thrombectomy and 20 (95.2%) receiving the procedure; in comparison, 81 patients (11.7%) did not meet all DAWN criteria and were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 52 (64.2%) receiving procedure. Lastly, 55 patients met DEFUSE-3 criteria for thrombectomy with 49 (89.1%) being transferred for potential thrombectomy and 45 (91.8%) receiving procedure. In comparison, 53 patients who did not meet all DEFUSE-3 criteria were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 27 (50.9%) receiving procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to understand CT-P/A usage, especially in patients that fall outside of treatment criteria in the current thrombectomy literature. Results may have value to institutions interested in using CT-P/A as a diagnostic tool as well as institutions already incorporating it in stroke assessments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9925360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99253602023-02-14 Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting Zahn, Cal D. Smith, Hayden L. Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R. Craig, Steve R. Hawthorne, Clint R. Hansen, Calvin J. Holdsworth, Ryan Justo-Roth, Suzie M. Kluesner, Nicholas H. Emerg Radiol Original Article PURPOSE: Evaluate concordance of provider practices with clinical guidelines for thrombectomy screening in an emergency department (ED) via computed tomography perfusion and angiogram (CT-P/A). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted for patients 18 years or older who received a CT-P/A of the head and neck in a US Midwestern ED between September 2019 through June 2021. Healthcare system records reviewed for patient information, CT-P/A findings, and treatment decisions. RESULTS: During study period, 68,403 patients presented to the ED with 718 (1.1%) receiving a CT-P/A. Of these patients, 105 (14.6%) were transferred to a regional facility for potential thrombectomy, with 74 (70.5%) receiving procedure, 28 (26.7%) not receiving procedure, and 3 (2.9%) with insufficient follow-up information. Of patients receiving CT-P/A, 23 met DAWN criteria for thrombectomy, with 21 (91.3%) transferred for potential thrombectomy and 20 (95.2%) receiving the procedure; in comparison, 81 patients (11.7%) did not meet all DAWN criteria and were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 52 (64.2%) receiving procedure. Lastly, 55 patients met DEFUSE-3 criteria for thrombectomy with 49 (89.1%) being transferred for potential thrombectomy and 45 (91.8%) receiving procedure. In comparison, 53 patients who did not meet all DEFUSE-3 criteria were transferred for potential thrombectomy, with 27 (50.9%) receiving procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps to understand CT-P/A usage, especially in patients that fall outside of treatment criteria in the current thrombectomy literature. Results may have value to institutions interested in using CT-P/A as a diagnostic tool as well as institutions already incorporating it in stroke assessments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925360/ /pubmed/36781817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zahn, Cal D. Smith, Hayden L. Hurdelbrink, Jonathan R. Craig, Steve R. Hawthorne, Clint R. Hansen, Calvin J. Holdsworth, Ryan Justo-Roth, Suzie M. Kluesner, Nicholas H. Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting |
title | Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting |
title_full | Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting |
title_short | Evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting |
title_sort | evaluation of computed tomography perfusion and angiogram use in stroke evaluation for thrombectomy at a community emergency department setting |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-023-02116-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zahncald evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting AT smithhaydenl evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting AT hurdelbrinkjonathanr evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting AT craigstever evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting AT hawthorneclintr evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting AT hansencalvinj evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting AT holdsworthryan evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting AT justorothsuziem evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting AT kluesnernicholash evaluationofcomputedtomographyperfusionandangiogramuseinstrokeevaluationforthrombectomyatacommunityemergencydepartmentsetting |