Cargando…
Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PURPOSE: Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection of knee and hip arthroplasty can be performed following one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Current literature is inconclusive whether one protocol is superior to the other, as prior literature reported similar reinfection rates for both treat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7 |
_version_ | 1784888070552682496 |
---|---|
author | Goud, Annemarie L. Harlianto, Netanja I. Ezzafzafi, Solaiman Veltman, Ewout S. Bekkers, Joris E. J. van der Wal, Bart C. H. |
author_facet | Goud, Annemarie L. Harlianto, Netanja I. Ezzafzafi, Solaiman Veltman, Ewout S. Bekkers, Joris E. J. van der Wal, Bart C. H. |
author_sort | Goud, Annemarie L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection of knee and hip arthroplasty can be performed following one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Current literature is inconclusive whether one protocol is superior to the other, as prior literature reported similar reinfection rates for both treatment options. We aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature on septic arthroplasty revisions. METHODS: Between April 2015 and December 2020, Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting reinfection outcomes in patients treated with one-stage and two-stage knee or hip revision arthroplasty. Two reviewers independently extracted data and disagreements were resolved by a third investigator. We utilized a double arcsine transformation, prior to pooling using a random-effects model. RESULTS: For hip revision arthroplasty, we identified 14 one-stage studies (n = 1237) with a pooled reinfection rate of 5.7% (95% CI 3.7–8.1%), and 46 two-stage studies (n = 5009) with a reinfection rate of 8.4% (95% CI 6.9–9.9%). For knee revision arthroplasty, 6 one-stage studies (n = 527) and 48 two-stage studies (n = 4344) were identified with reinfection rates of 12.7% (7.0–19.7%) and 16.2% (13.7–19.0%), respectively. Overall, reinfection rates did not vary substantially after subgroup analysis. Limitations of our study are the limited amount of one-stage studies that introduce a potential bias. CONCLUSION: The reinfection rates following one- and two-stage hip and knee arthroplasty revisions were similar. Knee reinfection rates have increased compared to the previous analysis. Individual patient characteristics and adequate treatment algorithms are needed for a more individual selection approach, until a randomized trial is performed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9925475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99254752023-02-15 Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis Goud, Annemarie L. Harlianto, Netanja I. Ezzafzafi, Solaiman Veltman, Ewout S. Bekkers, Joris E. J. van der Wal, Bart C. H. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery PURPOSE: Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection of knee and hip arthroplasty can be performed following one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Current literature is inconclusive whether one protocol is superior to the other, as prior literature reported similar reinfection rates for both treatment options. We aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature on septic arthroplasty revisions. METHODS: Between April 2015 and December 2020, Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting reinfection outcomes in patients treated with one-stage and two-stage knee or hip revision arthroplasty. Two reviewers independently extracted data and disagreements were resolved by a third investigator. We utilized a double arcsine transformation, prior to pooling using a random-effects model. RESULTS: For hip revision arthroplasty, we identified 14 one-stage studies (n = 1237) with a pooled reinfection rate of 5.7% (95% CI 3.7–8.1%), and 46 two-stage studies (n = 5009) with a reinfection rate of 8.4% (95% CI 6.9–9.9%). For knee revision arthroplasty, 6 one-stage studies (n = 527) and 48 two-stage studies (n = 4344) were identified with reinfection rates of 12.7% (7.0–19.7%) and 16.2% (13.7–19.0%), respectively. Overall, reinfection rates did not vary substantially after subgroup analysis. Limitations of our study are the limited amount of one-stage studies that introduce a potential bias. CONCLUSION: The reinfection rates following one- and two-stage hip and knee arthroplasty revisions were similar. Knee reinfection rates have increased compared to the previous analysis. Individual patient characteristics and adequate treatment algorithms are needed for a more individual selection approach, until a randomized trial is performed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925475/ /pubmed/34595545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Orthopaedic Surgery Goud, Annemarie L. Harlianto, Netanja I. Ezzafzafi, Solaiman Veltman, Ewout S. Bekkers, Joris E. J. van der Wal, Bart C. H. Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Orthopaedic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goudannemariel reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT harliantonetanjai reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ezzafzafisolaiman reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT veltmanewouts reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bekkersjorisej reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vanderwalbartch reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |