Cargando…

Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection of knee and hip arthroplasty can be performed following one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Current literature is inconclusive whether one protocol is superior to the other, as prior literature reported similar reinfection rates for both treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goud, Annemarie L., Harlianto, Netanja I., Ezzafzafi, Solaiman, Veltman, Ewout S., Bekkers, Joris E. J., van der Wal, Bart C. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7
_version_ 1784888070552682496
author Goud, Annemarie L.
Harlianto, Netanja I.
Ezzafzafi, Solaiman
Veltman, Ewout S.
Bekkers, Joris E. J.
van der Wal, Bart C. H.
author_facet Goud, Annemarie L.
Harlianto, Netanja I.
Ezzafzafi, Solaiman
Veltman, Ewout S.
Bekkers, Joris E. J.
van der Wal, Bart C. H.
author_sort Goud, Annemarie L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection of knee and hip arthroplasty can be performed following one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Current literature is inconclusive whether one protocol is superior to the other, as prior literature reported similar reinfection rates for both treatment options. We aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature on septic arthroplasty revisions. METHODS: Between April 2015 and December 2020, Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting reinfection outcomes in patients treated with one-stage and two-stage knee or hip revision arthroplasty. Two reviewers independently extracted data and disagreements were resolved by a third investigator. We utilized a double arcsine transformation, prior to pooling using a random-effects model. RESULTS: For hip revision arthroplasty, we identified 14 one-stage studies (n = 1237) with a pooled reinfection rate of 5.7% (95% CI 3.7–8.1%), and 46 two-stage studies (n = 5009) with a reinfection rate of 8.4% (95% CI 6.9–9.9%). For knee revision arthroplasty, 6 one-stage studies (n = 527) and 48 two-stage studies (n = 4344) were identified with reinfection rates of 12.7% (7.0–19.7%) and 16.2% (13.7–19.0%), respectively. Overall, reinfection rates did not vary substantially after subgroup analysis. Limitations of our study are the limited amount of one-stage studies that introduce a potential bias. CONCLUSION: The reinfection rates following one- and two-stage hip and knee arthroplasty revisions were similar. Knee reinfection rates have increased compared to the previous analysis. Individual patient characteristics and adequate treatment algorithms are needed for a more individual selection approach, until a randomized trial is performed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99254752023-02-15 Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis Goud, Annemarie L. Harlianto, Netanja I. Ezzafzafi, Solaiman Veltman, Ewout S. Bekkers, Joris E. J. van der Wal, Bart C. H. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery PURPOSE: Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection of knee and hip arthroplasty can be performed following one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Current literature is inconclusive whether one protocol is superior to the other, as prior literature reported similar reinfection rates for both treatment options. We aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature on septic arthroplasty revisions. METHODS: Between April 2015 and December 2020, Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting reinfection outcomes in patients treated with one-stage and two-stage knee or hip revision arthroplasty. Two reviewers independently extracted data and disagreements were resolved by a third investigator. We utilized a double arcsine transformation, prior to pooling using a random-effects model. RESULTS: For hip revision arthroplasty, we identified 14 one-stage studies (n = 1237) with a pooled reinfection rate of 5.7% (95% CI 3.7–8.1%), and 46 two-stage studies (n = 5009) with a reinfection rate of 8.4% (95% CI 6.9–9.9%). For knee revision arthroplasty, 6 one-stage studies (n = 527) and 48 two-stage studies (n = 4344) were identified with reinfection rates of 12.7% (7.0–19.7%) and 16.2% (13.7–19.0%), respectively. Overall, reinfection rates did not vary substantially after subgroup analysis. Limitations of our study are the limited amount of one-stage studies that introduce a potential bias. CONCLUSION: The reinfection rates following one- and two-stage hip and knee arthroplasty revisions were similar. Knee reinfection rates have increased compared to the previous analysis. Individual patient characteristics and adequate treatment algorithms are needed for a more individual selection approach, until a randomized trial is performed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925475/ /pubmed/34595545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Orthopaedic Surgery
Goud, Annemarie L.
Harlianto, Netanja I.
Ezzafzafi, Solaiman
Veltman, Ewout S.
Bekkers, Joris E. J.
van der Wal, Bart C. H.
Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort reinfection rates after one- and two-stage revision surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Orthopaedic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04190-7
work_keys_str_mv AT goudannemariel reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harliantonetanjai reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ezzafzafisolaiman reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT veltmanewouts reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bekkersjorisej reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanderwalbartch reinfectionratesafteroneandtwostagerevisionsurgeryforhipandkneearthroplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis