Cargando…

The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures

PURPOSE: Tibial plateau fractures continue to be a challenging task in clinical practice and current outcomes seem to provide the potential for further improvement. Especially presurgical understanding of the orientation of fracture lines and fracture severity is an essential key to sufficient surgi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dust, Tobias, Hartel, Maximilian J., Henneberg, Julian-Elias, Korthaus, Alexander, Ballhause, Tobias Malte, Keller, Johannes, Ohlmeier, Malte, Maas, Kai-Jonathan, Frosch, Karl-Heinz, Krause, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02055-1
_version_ 1784888080595943424
author Dust, Tobias
Hartel, Maximilian J.
Henneberg, Julian-Elias
Korthaus, Alexander
Ballhause, Tobias Malte
Keller, Johannes
Ohlmeier, Malte
Maas, Kai-Jonathan
Frosch, Karl-Heinz
Krause, Matthias
author_facet Dust, Tobias
Hartel, Maximilian J.
Henneberg, Julian-Elias
Korthaus, Alexander
Ballhause, Tobias Malte
Keller, Johannes
Ohlmeier, Malte
Maas, Kai-Jonathan
Frosch, Karl-Heinz
Krause, Matthias
author_sort Dust, Tobias
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Tibial plateau fractures continue to be a challenging task in clinical practice and current outcomes seem to provide the potential for further improvement. Especially presurgical understanding of the orientation of fracture lines and fracture severity is an essential key to sufficient surgical treatment. The object of this study was to evaluate the reliability of modern axial CT-based classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. In addition, the diagnostic-added value of 3D printing on the classification systems was investigated. METHODS: 22 raters were asked to classify 22 tibial plateau fractures (11 AO B- and 11 AO C-fractures) with the AO, the 10-Segment and the Revisited Schatzker classification in a three-step evaluation: first only using CT scans, second with 3D volumetric reconstructions and last with 3D-printed fracture models. Inter- and intraobserver agreement and the subjective certainty were analyzed. Statistics were done using kappa values, percentage match and a univariant one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The AO classifications interobserver percentage match and kappa values improved for all raters and recorded an overall value of 0.34, respectively, 43% for the 3D print. The 10-Segment classification interobserver agreement also improved with the 3D-printed models and scored an overall kappa value of 0.18 and a percentage match of 79%. Equally the Revisited Schatzker classification increased its values to 0.31 and 35%. The intraobserver agreement showed a moderate agreement for the AO (0.44) and Revisited Schatzker classification (0.42) whereas the 10-Segment classification showed a fair agreement (0.27). Additionally, the raters changed their classification in 36% of the cases after evaluating the fracture with the 3D-printed models and the subjective certainty regarding the decisions improved as categories of self-reliant diagnostic choices were selected 18% (p < 0.05) more often after using the 3D-printed models. CONCLUSION: Based on the measured outcomes it was concluded that the new classification systems show an overall slight to fair reliability and the use of 3D printing proved to be beneficial for the preoperative diagnostics of tibial plateau fractures. The 10-Segment classification system showed the highest percentage match evaluation of all classification systems demonstrating its high clinical value across all levels of user experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99255172023-02-15 The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures Dust, Tobias Hartel, Maximilian J. Henneberg, Julian-Elias Korthaus, Alexander Ballhause, Tobias Malte Keller, Johannes Ohlmeier, Malte Maas, Kai-Jonathan Frosch, Karl-Heinz Krause, Matthias Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Tibial plateau fractures continue to be a challenging task in clinical practice and current outcomes seem to provide the potential for further improvement. Especially presurgical understanding of the orientation of fracture lines and fracture severity is an essential key to sufficient surgical treatment. The object of this study was to evaluate the reliability of modern axial CT-based classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. In addition, the diagnostic-added value of 3D printing on the classification systems was investigated. METHODS: 22 raters were asked to classify 22 tibial plateau fractures (11 AO B- and 11 AO C-fractures) with the AO, the 10-Segment and the Revisited Schatzker classification in a three-step evaluation: first only using CT scans, second with 3D volumetric reconstructions and last with 3D-printed fracture models. Inter- and intraobserver agreement and the subjective certainty were analyzed. Statistics were done using kappa values, percentage match and a univariant one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The AO classifications interobserver percentage match and kappa values improved for all raters and recorded an overall value of 0.34, respectively, 43% for the 3D print. The 10-Segment classification interobserver agreement also improved with the 3D-printed models and scored an overall kappa value of 0.18 and a percentage match of 79%. Equally the Revisited Schatzker classification increased its values to 0.31 and 35%. The intraobserver agreement showed a moderate agreement for the AO (0.44) and Revisited Schatzker classification (0.42) whereas the 10-Segment classification showed a fair agreement (0.27). Additionally, the raters changed their classification in 36% of the cases after evaluating the fracture with the 3D-printed models and the subjective certainty regarding the decisions improved as categories of self-reliant diagnostic choices were selected 18% (p < 0.05) more often after using the 3D-printed models. CONCLUSION: Based on the measured outcomes it was concluded that the new classification systems show an overall slight to fair reliability and the use of 3D printing proved to be beneficial for the preoperative diagnostics of tibial plateau fractures. The 10-Segment classification system showed the highest percentage match evaluation of all classification systems demonstrating its high clinical value across all levels of user experience. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925517/ /pubmed/35941251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02055-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Dust, Tobias
Hartel, Maximilian J.
Henneberg, Julian-Elias
Korthaus, Alexander
Ballhause, Tobias Malte
Keller, Johannes
Ohlmeier, Malte
Maas, Kai-Jonathan
Frosch, Karl-Heinz
Krause, Matthias
The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures
title The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures
title_full The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures
title_fullStr The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures
title_full_unstemmed The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures
title_short The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures
title_sort influence of 3d printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02055-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dusttobias theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT hartelmaximilianj theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT hennebergjulianelias theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT korthausalexander theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT ballhausetobiasmalte theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT kellerjohannes theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT ohlmeiermalte theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT maaskaijonathan theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT froschkarlheinz theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT krausematthias theinfluenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT dusttobias influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT hartelmaximilianj influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT hennebergjulianelias influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT korthausalexander influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT ballhausetobiasmalte influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT kellerjohannes influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT ohlmeiermalte influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT maaskaijonathan influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT froschkarlheinz influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures
AT krausematthias influenceof3dprintingoninterandintraraterreliabilityontheclassificationoftibialplateaufractures