Cargando…

Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment

Information systems such as Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are susceptible to data quality (DQ) issues. Given the growing importance of EHR data, there is an increasing demand for strategies and tools to help ensure that available data are fit for use. However, developing reliable data quali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozonze, Obinwa, Scott, Philip J., Hopgood, Adrian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2
_version_ 1784888085165637632
author Ozonze, Obinwa
Scott, Philip J.
Hopgood, Adrian A.
author_facet Ozonze, Obinwa
Scott, Philip J.
Hopgood, Adrian A.
author_sort Ozonze, Obinwa
collection PubMed
description Information systems such as Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are susceptible to data quality (DQ) issues. Given the growing importance of EHR data, there is an increasing demand for strategies and tools to help ensure that available data are fit for use. However, developing reliable data quality assessment (DQA) tools necessary for guiding and evaluating improvement efforts has remained a fundamental challenge. This review examines the state of research on operationalising EHR DQA, mainly automated tooling, and highlights necessary considerations for future implementations. We reviewed 1841 articles from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus published between 2011 and 2021. 23 DQA programs deployed in real-world settings to assess EHR data quality (n = 14), and a few experimental prototypes (n = 9), were identified. Many of these programs investigate completeness (n = 15) and value conformance (n = 12) quality dimensions and are backed by knowledge items gathered from domain experts (n = 9), literature reviews and existing DQ measurements (n = 3). A few DQA programs also explore the feasibility of using data-driven techniques to assess EHR data quality automatically. Overall, the automation of EHR DQA is gaining traction, but current efforts are fragmented and not backed by relevant theory. Existing programs also vary in scope, type of data supported, and how measurements are sourced. There is a need to standardise programs for assessing EHR data quality, as current evidence suggests their quality may be unknown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99255372023-02-15 Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment Ozonze, Obinwa Scott, Philip J. Hopgood, Adrian A. J Med Syst Review Information systems such as Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are susceptible to data quality (DQ) issues. Given the growing importance of EHR data, there is an increasing demand for strategies and tools to help ensure that available data are fit for use. However, developing reliable data quality assessment (DQA) tools necessary for guiding and evaluating improvement efforts has remained a fundamental challenge. This review examines the state of research on operationalising EHR DQA, mainly automated tooling, and highlights necessary considerations for future implementations. We reviewed 1841 articles from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus published between 2011 and 2021. 23 DQA programs deployed in real-world settings to assess EHR data quality (n = 14), and a few experimental prototypes (n = 9), were identified. Many of these programs investigate completeness (n = 15) and value conformance (n = 12) quality dimensions and are backed by knowledge items gathered from domain experts (n = 9), literature reviews and existing DQ measurements (n = 3). A few DQA programs also explore the feasibility of using data-driven techniques to assess EHR data quality automatically. Overall, the automation of EHR DQA is gaining traction, but current efforts are fragmented and not backed by relevant theory. Existing programs also vary in scope, type of data supported, and how measurements are sourced. There is a need to standardise programs for assessing EHR data quality, as current evidence suggests their quality may be unknown. Springer US 2023-02-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925537/ /pubmed/36781551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Ozonze, Obinwa
Scott, Philip J.
Hopgood, Adrian A.
Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment
title Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment
title_full Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment
title_fullStr Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment
title_short Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment
title_sort automating electronic health record data quality assessment
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ozonzeobinwa automatingelectronichealthrecorddataqualityassessment
AT scottphilipj automatingelectronichealthrecorddataqualityassessment
AT hopgoodadriana automatingelectronichealthrecorddataqualityassessment