Cargando…
Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment
Information systems such as Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are susceptible to data quality (DQ) issues. Given the growing importance of EHR data, there is an increasing demand for strategies and tools to help ensure that available data are fit for use. However, developing reliable data quali...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2 |
_version_ | 1784888085165637632 |
---|---|
author | Ozonze, Obinwa Scott, Philip J. Hopgood, Adrian A. |
author_facet | Ozonze, Obinwa Scott, Philip J. Hopgood, Adrian A. |
author_sort | Ozonze, Obinwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Information systems such as Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are susceptible to data quality (DQ) issues. Given the growing importance of EHR data, there is an increasing demand for strategies and tools to help ensure that available data are fit for use. However, developing reliable data quality assessment (DQA) tools necessary for guiding and evaluating improvement efforts has remained a fundamental challenge. This review examines the state of research on operationalising EHR DQA, mainly automated tooling, and highlights necessary considerations for future implementations. We reviewed 1841 articles from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus published between 2011 and 2021. 23 DQA programs deployed in real-world settings to assess EHR data quality (n = 14), and a few experimental prototypes (n = 9), were identified. Many of these programs investigate completeness (n = 15) and value conformance (n = 12) quality dimensions and are backed by knowledge items gathered from domain experts (n = 9), literature reviews and existing DQ measurements (n = 3). A few DQA programs also explore the feasibility of using data-driven techniques to assess EHR data quality automatically. Overall, the automation of EHR DQA is gaining traction, but current efforts are fragmented and not backed by relevant theory. Existing programs also vary in scope, type of data supported, and how measurements are sourced. There is a need to standardise programs for assessing EHR data quality, as current evidence suggests their quality may be unknown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9925537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99255372023-02-15 Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment Ozonze, Obinwa Scott, Philip J. Hopgood, Adrian A. J Med Syst Review Information systems such as Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are susceptible to data quality (DQ) issues. Given the growing importance of EHR data, there is an increasing demand for strategies and tools to help ensure that available data are fit for use. However, developing reliable data quality assessment (DQA) tools necessary for guiding and evaluating improvement efforts has remained a fundamental challenge. This review examines the state of research on operationalising EHR DQA, mainly automated tooling, and highlights necessary considerations for future implementations. We reviewed 1841 articles from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus published between 2011 and 2021. 23 DQA programs deployed in real-world settings to assess EHR data quality (n = 14), and a few experimental prototypes (n = 9), were identified. Many of these programs investigate completeness (n = 15) and value conformance (n = 12) quality dimensions and are backed by knowledge items gathered from domain experts (n = 9), literature reviews and existing DQ measurements (n = 3). A few DQA programs also explore the feasibility of using data-driven techniques to assess EHR data quality automatically. Overall, the automation of EHR DQA is gaining traction, but current efforts are fragmented and not backed by relevant theory. Existing programs also vary in scope, type of data supported, and how measurements are sourced. There is a need to standardise programs for assessing EHR data quality, as current evidence suggests their quality may be unknown. Springer US 2023-02-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925537/ /pubmed/36781551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Ozonze, Obinwa Scott, Philip J. Hopgood, Adrian A. Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment |
title | Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment |
title_full | Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment |
title_fullStr | Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment |
title_short | Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment |
title_sort | automating electronic health record data quality assessment |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozonzeobinwa automatingelectronichealthrecorddataqualityassessment AT scottphilipj automatingelectronichealthrecorddataqualityassessment AT hopgoodadriana automatingelectronichealthrecorddataqualityassessment |