Cargando…

Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients

PURPOSE: Intraoperative 3D imaging has become a valued tool in assessing the quality of reduction and implant placement in orthopedic trauma surgery. In our institution, 3D imaging is used routinely since 2001. To evaluate the intraoperative findings and consequences of this technique, intraoperativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keil, Holger, Beisemann, Nils, Swartman, Benedict, Schnetzke, Marc, Vetter, Sven Yves, Grützner, Paul Alfred, Franke, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36048181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02083-x
_version_ 1784888087134863360
author Keil, Holger
Beisemann, Nils
Swartman, Benedict
Schnetzke, Marc
Vetter, Sven Yves
Grützner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
author_facet Keil, Holger
Beisemann, Nils
Swartman, Benedict
Schnetzke, Marc
Vetter, Sven Yves
Grützner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
author_sort Keil, Holger
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Intraoperative 3D imaging has become a valued tool in assessing the quality of reduction and implant placement in orthopedic trauma surgery. In our institution, 3D imaging is used routinely since 2001. To evaluate the intraoperative findings and consequences of this technique, intraoperative revision rates in cases with 3D imaging were analyzed. METHODS: All operative procedures carried out with intraoperative 3D imaging between August 2001 and December 2016 were included. The scans were assessed intraoperatively and documented thereafter. In case of malreduction or misplaced implants, an immediate revision was performed. The number of scans per case as well as the findings and consequences drawn regarding the anatomical region were analyzed. RESULTS: 4721 cases with 7201 3D scans were included in this study. The most common anatomical regions were the ankle (22.3%), the calcaneus (14.8%) and the tibial head (9.5%). In 19.1% of all cases, an intraoperative revision was performed. The highest revision rates were found with 36.0% in calcaneal fractures, 24.8% in fractures of the tibial plateau, 22.3% in injuries of the ankle. In 52.0% of revisions, the reduction was improved regarding intra-articular steps or joint congruency. In 30.5% an implant was corrected. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative revision due to results of 3D imaging was performed in almost one-fifth of cases. This illustrates the improved possibilities to detect malreduction and implant misplacements intraoperatively and thus the abilities to improve surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99255452023-02-15 Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients Keil, Holger Beisemann, Nils Swartman, Benedict Schnetzke, Marc Vetter, Sven Yves Grützner, Paul Alfred Franke, Jochen Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Intraoperative 3D imaging has become a valued tool in assessing the quality of reduction and implant placement in orthopedic trauma surgery. In our institution, 3D imaging is used routinely since 2001. To evaluate the intraoperative findings and consequences of this technique, intraoperative revision rates in cases with 3D imaging were analyzed. METHODS: All operative procedures carried out with intraoperative 3D imaging between August 2001 and December 2016 were included. The scans were assessed intraoperatively and documented thereafter. In case of malreduction or misplaced implants, an immediate revision was performed. The number of scans per case as well as the findings and consequences drawn regarding the anatomical region were analyzed. RESULTS: 4721 cases with 7201 3D scans were included in this study. The most common anatomical regions were the ankle (22.3%), the calcaneus (14.8%) and the tibial head (9.5%). In 19.1% of all cases, an intraoperative revision was performed. The highest revision rates were found with 36.0% in calcaneal fractures, 24.8% in fractures of the tibial plateau, 22.3% in injuries of the ankle. In 52.0% of revisions, the reduction was improved regarding intra-articular steps or joint congruency. In 30.5% an implant was corrected. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative revision due to results of 3D imaging was performed in almost one-fifth of cases. This illustrates the improved possibilities to detect malreduction and implant misplacements intraoperatively and thus the abilities to improve surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925545/ /pubmed/36048181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02083-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Keil, Holger
Beisemann, Nils
Swartman, Benedict
Schnetzke, Marc
Vetter, Sven Yves
Grützner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients
title Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients
title_full Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients
title_fullStr Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients
title_short Intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients
title_sort intraoperative revision rates due to three-dimensional imaging in orthopedic trauma surgery: results of a case series of 4721 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36048181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02083-x
work_keys_str_mv AT keilholger intraoperativerevisionratesduetothreedimensionalimaginginorthopedictraumasurgeryresultsofacaseseriesof4721patients
AT beisemannnils intraoperativerevisionratesduetothreedimensionalimaginginorthopedictraumasurgeryresultsofacaseseriesof4721patients
AT swartmanbenedict intraoperativerevisionratesduetothreedimensionalimaginginorthopedictraumasurgeryresultsofacaseseriesof4721patients
AT schnetzkemarc intraoperativerevisionratesduetothreedimensionalimaginginorthopedictraumasurgeryresultsofacaseseriesof4721patients
AT vettersvenyves intraoperativerevisionratesduetothreedimensionalimaginginorthopedictraumasurgeryresultsofacaseseriesof4721patients
AT grutznerpaulalfred intraoperativerevisionratesduetothreedimensionalimaginginorthopedictraumasurgeryresultsofacaseseriesof4721patients
AT frankejochen intraoperativerevisionratesduetothreedimensionalimaginginorthopedictraumasurgeryresultsofacaseseriesof4721patients