Cargando…
Survivorship, complications and patient-reported outcomes in calcar-guided short-stem THA: prospective mid-term multicenter data of the first 879 hips
INTRODUCTION: Short stems are a bone and soft-tissue preserving alternative to conventional stems. The aim of this multicenter study is to present the mid-term outcomes of a calcar-guided short stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case series of the first 879 total hip arthroplasties p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35076767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04354-z |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Short stems are a bone and soft-tissue preserving alternative to conventional stems. The aim of this multicenter study is to present the mid-term outcomes of a calcar-guided short stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case series of the first 879 total hip arthroplasties performed on 782 patients across 5 centers using identical calcar-guided short stems. In a mid-term follow-up (6 years), rates and reasons for complications and revisions were documented. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was obtained; patients reported pain and satisfaction using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients died in the study cohort for non-related reasons; 26 patients (3.0%) required at least 1 revision after the index procedure. The survival rate for endpoint stem revision at mid-term was 98.4%. The main reasons for stem revision were aseptic loosening and early periprosthetic fractures. Sex had no influence on stem survival. Older patients or those with a high body mass index showed increased risk for stem revision during follow-up. Dorr type A morphology revealed a significantly lower risk of stem revision than Dorr type B or C (p = 0.0465). The HHS, satisfaction, and load pain at mid-term were 96.5 (SD 8.0), 9.7 (SD 0.9), and 0.5 (SD 1.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This short stem produced highly satisfactory outcomes at mid-term, with 98.4% implant survival for any cause of stem revision and low complication rates. Long-term results are required to further evaluate these promising mid-term results. |
---|