Cargando…
Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opportunistic screening is a combination of techniques to identify subjects of high risk for osteoporotic fracture using routine clinical CT scans prescribed for diagnoses unrelated to osteoporosis. The two main components are automated detection of vertebral fractures and measure...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11914-022-00764-5 |
_version_ | 1784888095278104576 |
---|---|
author | Engelke, Klaus Chaudry, Oliver Bartenschlager, Stefan |
author_facet | Engelke, Klaus Chaudry, Oliver Bartenschlager, Stefan |
author_sort | Engelke, Klaus |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opportunistic screening is a combination of techniques to identify subjects of high risk for osteoporotic fracture using routine clinical CT scans prescribed for diagnoses unrelated to osteoporosis. The two main components are automated detection of vertebral fractures and measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in CT scans, in which a phantom for calibration of CT to BMD values is not used. This review describes the particular challenges of opportunistic screening and provides an overview and comparison of current techniques used for opportunistic screening. The review further outlines the performance of opportunistic screening. RECENT FINDINGS: A wide range of technologies for the automatic detection of vertebral fractures have been developed and successfully validated. Most of them are based on artificial intelligence algorithms. The automated differentiation of osteoporotic from traumatic fractures and vertebral deformities unrelated to osteoporosis, the grading of vertebral fracture severity, and the detection of mild vertebral fractures is still problematic. The accuracy of automated fracture detection compared to classical radiological semi-quantitative Genant scoring is about 80%. Accuracy errors of alternative BMD calibration methods compared to simultaneous phantom-based calibration used in standard quantitative CT (QCT) range from below 5% to about 10%. The impact of contrast agents, frequently administered in clinical CT on the determination of BMD and on fracture risk determination is still controversial. SUMMARY: Opportunistic screening, the identification of vertebral fracture and the measurement of BMD using clinical routine CT scans, is feasible but corresponding techniques still need to be integrated into the clinical workflow and further validated with respect to the prediction of fracture risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9925590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99255902023-02-15 Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans Engelke, Klaus Chaudry, Oliver Bartenschlager, Stefan Curr Osteoporos Rep Imaging (H Isaksson and S Boyd, Section Editors) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opportunistic screening is a combination of techniques to identify subjects of high risk for osteoporotic fracture using routine clinical CT scans prescribed for diagnoses unrelated to osteoporosis. The two main components are automated detection of vertebral fractures and measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in CT scans, in which a phantom for calibration of CT to BMD values is not used. This review describes the particular challenges of opportunistic screening and provides an overview and comparison of current techniques used for opportunistic screening. The review further outlines the performance of opportunistic screening. RECENT FINDINGS: A wide range of technologies for the automatic detection of vertebral fractures have been developed and successfully validated. Most of them are based on artificial intelligence algorithms. The automated differentiation of osteoporotic from traumatic fractures and vertebral deformities unrelated to osteoporosis, the grading of vertebral fracture severity, and the detection of mild vertebral fractures is still problematic. The accuracy of automated fracture detection compared to classical radiological semi-quantitative Genant scoring is about 80%. Accuracy errors of alternative BMD calibration methods compared to simultaneous phantom-based calibration used in standard quantitative CT (QCT) range from below 5% to about 10%. The impact of contrast agents, frequently administered in clinical CT on the determination of BMD and on fracture risk determination is still controversial. SUMMARY: Opportunistic screening, the identification of vertebral fracture and the measurement of BMD using clinical routine CT scans, is feasible but corresponding techniques still need to be integrated into the clinical workflow and further validated with respect to the prediction of fracture risk. Springer US 2022-11-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925590/ /pubmed/36435912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11914-022-00764-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Imaging (H Isaksson and S Boyd, Section Editors) Engelke, Klaus Chaudry, Oliver Bartenschlager, Stefan Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans |
title | Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans |
title_full | Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans |
title_fullStr | Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans |
title_full_unstemmed | Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans |
title_short | Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans |
title_sort | opportunistic screening techniques for analysis of ct scans |
topic | Imaging (H Isaksson and S Boyd, Section Editors) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36435912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11914-022-00764-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engelkeklaus opportunisticscreeningtechniquesforanalysisofctscans AT chaudryoliver opportunisticscreeningtechniquesforanalysisofctscans AT bartenschlagerstefan opportunisticscreeningtechniquesforanalysisofctscans |