Cargando…
Tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Foot drop is a disorder that impairs walking and leads to tripping and falling. Tendon transfer (e.g., tibialis posterior tendon) is a typical secondary procedure in foot drop treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the most common tendon transfer techniques fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34524486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04162-x |
_version_ | 1784888098199437312 |
---|---|
author | Stevoska, Stella Pisecky, Lorenz Stadler, Christian Gahleitner, Manuel Klasan, Antonio Klotz, Matthias C. |
author_facet | Stevoska, Stella Pisecky, Lorenz Stadler, Christian Gahleitner, Manuel Klasan, Antonio Klotz, Matthias C. |
author_sort | Stevoska, Stella |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Foot drop is a disorder that impairs walking and leads to tripping and falling. Tendon transfer (e.g., tibialis posterior tendon) is a typical secondary procedure in foot drop treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the most common tendon transfer techniques for treating foot drop and to analyze the reported functional outcomes. Furthermore, it was of interest if the type of surgical technique affects the functional outcome. METHODS: A PubMed and MEDLINE literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The search terms used were (“tendon transfer” OR “tendon transposition”) AND (“foot drop” OR “peroneal neuropathies”). Any study published before January 2020 was considered for inclusion. No case reports or reviews were included. Common outcome measures (Stanmore score, AOFAS, FAAM, AFO use, patient satisfaction and active ankle dorsiflexion) were evaluated. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS: Of the 125 reviewed publications, 37 met the inclusion criteria. 42 cohorts were analyzed. The frequently reported tendon transfer technique was the tibialis posterior tendon transfer through the interosseus membrane. The most used fixation technique was tendon on tendon fixation; however in recent years, a tendon to bone fixation has gained popularity. There was an increase in Stanmore scores and AOFAS postoperatively and a decrease of AFO use postoperatively observed. CONCLUSIONS: Due to various outcome measures and lack of preoperative assessment in the included studies, a meta-analysis of the pooled results was not possible. Nevertheless, the findings of this study show that tendon transfer increases mobility and self-independency leading to patient satisfaction. The choice of the surgical technique does not affect the outcome. A prospective collection of patient data and standardized outcome measures will be important to further analyze the efficacy of tendon transfer techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9925604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99256042023-02-15 Tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review Stevoska, Stella Pisecky, Lorenz Stadler, Christian Gahleitner, Manuel Klasan, Antonio Klotz, Matthias C. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery INTRODUCTION: Foot drop is a disorder that impairs walking and leads to tripping and falling. Tendon transfer (e.g., tibialis posterior tendon) is a typical secondary procedure in foot drop treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the most common tendon transfer techniques for treating foot drop and to analyze the reported functional outcomes. Furthermore, it was of interest if the type of surgical technique affects the functional outcome. METHODS: A PubMed and MEDLINE literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The search terms used were (“tendon transfer” OR “tendon transposition”) AND (“foot drop” OR “peroneal neuropathies”). Any study published before January 2020 was considered for inclusion. No case reports or reviews were included. Common outcome measures (Stanmore score, AOFAS, FAAM, AFO use, patient satisfaction and active ankle dorsiflexion) were evaluated. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS: Of the 125 reviewed publications, 37 met the inclusion criteria. 42 cohorts were analyzed. The frequently reported tendon transfer technique was the tibialis posterior tendon transfer through the interosseus membrane. The most used fixation technique was tendon on tendon fixation; however in recent years, a tendon to bone fixation has gained popularity. There was an increase in Stanmore scores and AOFAS postoperatively and a decrease of AFO use postoperatively observed. CONCLUSIONS: Due to various outcome measures and lack of preoperative assessment in the included studies, a meta-analysis of the pooled results was not possible. Nevertheless, the findings of this study show that tendon transfer increases mobility and self-independency leading to patient satisfaction. The choice of the surgical technique does not affect the outcome. A prospective collection of patient data and standardized outcome measures will be important to further analyze the efficacy of tendon transfer techniques. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9925604/ /pubmed/34524486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04162-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Orthopaedic Surgery Stevoska, Stella Pisecky, Lorenz Stadler, Christian Gahleitner, Manuel Klasan, Antonio Klotz, Matthias C. Tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review |
title | Tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review |
title_full | Tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review |
title_short | Tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review |
title_sort | tendon transfer in foot drop: a systematic review |
topic | Orthopaedic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34524486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04162-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stevoskastella tendontransferinfootdropasystematicreview AT piseckylorenz tendontransferinfootdropasystematicreview AT stadlerchristian tendontransferinfootdropasystematicreview AT gahleitnermanuel tendontransferinfootdropasystematicreview AT klasanantonio tendontransferinfootdropasystematicreview AT klotzmatthiasc tendontransferinfootdropasystematicreview |