Cargando…

Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mental health institutions and community organizations have had difficulty recruiting patients and caregivers onto their Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Committees (PFACs). Previous research has focused on barriers and enablers of engaging patients and caregivers who hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Cynthia, Dorland, Alexis, Jaworska, Natalia, McQuaid, Robyn J., Langlois, Michèle, Dzierszinski, Florence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1114
_version_ 1784888141361971200
author Clark, Cynthia
Dorland, Alexis
Jaworska, Natalia
McQuaid, Robyn J.
Langlois, Michèle
Dzierszinski, Florence
author_facet Clark, Cynthia
Dorland, Alexis
Jaworska, Natalia
McQuaid, Robyn J.
Langlois, Michèle
Dzierszinski, Florence
author_sort Clark, Cynthia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mental health institutions and community organizations have had difficulty recruiting patients and caregivers onto their Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Committees (PFACs). Previous research has focused on barriers and enablers of engaging patients and caregivers who have advisory experience. This study acknowledges the experiential difference between patients and caregivers by focusing only on caregivers; further, we compare the barriers and enablers between advising versus non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness. METHODS: Data from a cross‐sectional survey codesigned by researchers, staff, clients, and caregiver affiliated with a tertiary mental health center were completed by n = 84 caregivers (n = 40 past/current PFAC advising caregivers; n = 44 non‐advising caregivers). RESULTS: Caregivers were disproportionately female and late middle‐aged. Advising and non‐advising caregivers differed on employment status. There were no differences of the demographics of their care‐recipients. More non‐advising caregivers reported being hindered from PFAC engagement by family‐related duties and interpersonal demands. Finally, more advising caregivers considered being publicly acknowledged as important. CONCLUSIONS: Advising and non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness were similar in demographics and in reporting the enablers and hindrances that impact PFAC engagement. Nevertheless, our data highlights specific considerations that institutions/organizations should consider when recruiting and retaining caregivers on PFACs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project was led by a caregiver advisor to address a need she saw in the community. The surveys were codesigned by a team of two caregivers, one patient, and one researcher. The surveys were reviewed by a group of five caregivers external to the project. The results of the surveys were discussed with two caregivers involved directly with the project.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99258312023-02-14 Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey Clark, Cynthia Dorland, Alexis Jaworska, Natalia McQuaid, Robyn J. Langlois, Michèle Dzierszinski, Florence Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mental health institutions and community organizations have had difficulty recruiting patients and caregivers onto their Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Committees (PFACs). Previous research has focused on barriers and enablers of engaging patients and caregivers who have advisory experience. This study acknowledges the experiential difference between patients and caregivers by focusing only on caregivers; further, we compare the barriers and enablers between advising versus non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness. METHODS: Data from a cross‐sectional survey codesigned by researchers, staff, clients, and caregiver affiliated with a tertiary mental health center were completed by n = 84 caregivers (n = 40 past/current PFAC advising caregivers; n = 44 non‐advising caregivers). RESULTS: Caregivers were disproportionately female and late middle‐aged. Advising and non‐advising caregivers differed on employment status. There were no differences of the demographics of their care‐recipients. More non‐advising caregivers reported being hindered from PFAC engagement by family‐related duties and interpersonal demands. Finally, more advising caregivers considered being publicly acknowledged as important. CONCLUSIONS: Advising and non‐advising caregivers of loved ones with mental illness were similar in demographics and in reporting the enablers and hindrances that impact PFAC engagement. Nevertheless, our data highlights specific considerations that institutions/organizations should consider when recruiting and retaining caregivers on PFACs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project was led by a caregiver advisor to address a need she saw in the community. The surveys were codesigned by a team of two caregivers, one patient, and one researcher. The surveys were reviewed by a group of five caregivers external to the project. The results of the surveys were discussed with two caregivers involved directly with the project. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9925831/ /pubmed/36794126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1114 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Clark, Cynthia
Dorland, Alexis
Jaworska, Natalia
McQuaid, Robyn J.
Langlois, Michèle
Dzierszinski, Florence
Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_full Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_fullStr Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_short Benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: Results from a cross‐sectional survey
title_sort benefits and barriers to engagement of mental health caregivers in advisory roles: results from a cross‐sectional survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36794126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1114
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkcynthia benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT dorlandalexis benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT jaworskanatalia benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT mcquaidrobynj benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT langloismichele benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT dzierszinskiflorence benefitsandbarrierstoengagementofmentalhealthcaregiversinadvisoryrolesresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey