Cargando…

The prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Comorbidity is associated with adverse outcomes for all lung cancer patients, but its burden is less understood in the context of screening. This review synthesises the prevalence of comorbidities among lung cancer screening (LCS) candidates and summarises the clinical recommendations for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almatrafi, Anas, Thomas, Owen, Callister, Matthew, Gabe, Rhian, Beeken, Rebecca J, Neal, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221117685
_version_ 1784888155441201152
author Almatrafi, Anas
Thomas, Owen
Callister, Matthew
Gabe, Rhian
Beeken, Rebecca J
Neal, Richard
author_facet Almatrafi, Anas
Thomas, Owen
Callister, Matthew
Gabe, Rhian
Beeken, Rebecca J
Neal, Richard
author_sort Almatrafi, Anas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Comorbidity is associated with adverse outcomes for all lung cancer patients, but its burden is less understood in the context of screening. This review synthesises the prevalence of comorbidities among lung cancer screening (LCS) candidates and summarises the clinical recommendations for screening comorbid individuals. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, and CINAHL databases from January 1990 to February 2021. We included LCS studies that reported a prevalence of comorbidity, as a prevalence of a particular condition, or as a summary score. We also summarised LCS clinical guidelines that addressed comorbidity or frailty for LCS as a secondary objective for this review. Meta-analysis was used with inverse-variance weights obtained from a random-effects model to estimate the prevalence of selected comorbidities. RESULTS: We included 69 studies in the review; seven reported comorbidity summary scores, two reported performance status, 48 reported individual comorbidities, and 12 were clinical guideline papers. The meta-analysis of individual comorbidities resulted in an estimated prevalence of 35.2% for hypertension, 23.5% for history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (10.7% for severe COPD), 16.6% for ischaemic heart disease (IHD), 13.1% for peripheral vascular disease (PVD), 12.9% for asthma, 12.5% for diabetes, 4.5% for bronchiectasis, 2.2% for stroke, and 0.5% for pulmonary fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities were highly prevalent in LCS populations and likely to be more prevalent than in other cancer screening programmes. Further research on the burden of comorbid disease and its impact on screening uptake and outcomes is needed. Identifying individuals with frailty and comorbidities who might not benefit from screening should become a priority in LCS research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99258962023-02-15 The prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: A systematic review and meta-analysis Almatrafi, Anas Thomas, Owen Callister, Matthew Gabe, Rhian Beeken, Rebecca J Neal, Richard J Med Screen Reviews OBJECTIVE: Comorbidity is associated with adverse outcomes for all lung cancer patients, but its burden is less understood in the context of screening. This review synthesises the prevalence of comorbidities among lung cancer screening (LCS) candidates and summarises the clinical recommendations for screening comorbid individuals. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, and CINAHL databases from January 1990 to February 2021. We included LCS studies that reported a prevalence of comorbidity, as a prevalence of a particular condition, or as a summary score. We also summarised LCS clinical guidelines that addressed comorbidity or frailty for LCS as a secondary objective for this review. Meta-analysis was used with inverse-variance weights obtained from a random-effects model to estimate the prevalence of selected comorbidities. RESULTS: We included 69 studies in the review; seven reported comorbidity summary scores, two reported performance status, 48 reported individual comorbidities, and 12 were clinical guideline papers. The meta-analysis of individual comorbidities resulted in an estimated prevalence of 35.2% for hypertension, 23.5% for history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (10.7% for severe COPD), 16.6% for ischaemic heart disease (IHD), 13.1% for peripheral vascular disease (PVD), 12.9% for asthma, 12.5% for diabetes, 4.5% for bronchiectasis, 2.2% for stroke, and 0.5% for pulmonary fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities were highly prevalent in LCS populations and likely to be more prevalent than in other cancer screening programmes. Further research on the burden of comorbid disease and its impact on screening uptake and outcomes is needed. Identifying individuals with frailty and comorbidities who might not benefit from screening should become a priority in LCS research. SAGE Publications 2022-08-09 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9925896/ /pubmed/35942779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221117685 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Reviews
Almatrafi, Anas
Thomas, Owen
Callister, Matthew
Gabe, Rhian
Beeken, Rebecca J
Neal, Richard
The prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of comorbidity in the lung cancer screening population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09691413221117685
work_keys_str_mv AT almatrafianas theprevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thomasowen theprevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT callistermatthew theprevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaberhian theprevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beekenrebeccaj theprevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nealrichard theprevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT almatrafianas prevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thomasowen prevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT callistermatthew prevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaberhian prevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beekenrebeccaj prevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nealrichard prevalenceofcomorbidityinthelungcancerscreeningpopulationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis