Cargando…

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers

AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between physiologic saline and G-Rinse medium solution for cervical mucus washing, in fresh elective single-embryo transfers (ET) in women under the age of 37. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective data analysis performed in a single in vitro fertiliza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gursu, Turkan, Eraslan, Alper, Angun, Berk, Celik, Hale Goksever, Yeh, John, Bastu, Ercan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02747-6
_version_ 1784888160500580352
author Gursu, Turkan
Eraslan, Alper
Angun, Berk
Celik, Hale Goksever
Yeh, John
Bastu, Ercan
author_facet Gursu, Turkan
Eraslan, Alper
Angun, Berk
Celik, Hale Goksever
Yeh, John
Bastu, Ercan
author_sort Gursu, Turkan
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between physiologic saline and G-Rinse medium solution for cervical mucus washing, in fresh elective single-embryo transfers (ET) in women under the age of 37. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective data analysis performed in a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) center between February 2018 and November 2021. Women younger than 37 years who underwent single elective ET were included and all women had anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels ≥ 1.5 ng/ml. Age, body mass index (BMI), AMH levels, and pregnancy outcomes as clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were analyzed. RESULTS: Study population consisted of 75 women in the G-Rinse medium solution group and 97 women in the physiologic saline group. Clinical pregnancy rate was 58.7% and 61.9% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.673), and LBR was calculated as 41.3% and 47.4% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.430). A log-binomial regression model was used and the model was adjusted for BMI to evaluate the effect of the cervical mucus washing method on the pregnancy outcomes. There was an estimated 5% decrease in the relative risk for CPR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.2, p = 0.673). There was an estimated 13% reduction in the relative risk for LBR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.62 to 1.23, p = 0.430). They were both statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In our study, the replacement of using G-Rinse medium solution to physiologic saline solution for cervical cleaning did not change CPR and LBR outcomes. Using physiologic saline solution can be a good alternative approach for ectocervical washing during embryo transfer in selected population because of its lower costs, easy accessibility, and common use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9925918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99259182023-02-14 Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers Gursu, Turkan Eraslan, Alper Angun, Berk Celik, Hale Goksever Yeh, John Bastu, Ercan J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between physiologic saline and G-Rinse medium solution for cervical mucus washing, in fresh elective single-embryo transfers (ET) in women under the age of 37. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective data analysis performed in a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) center between February 2018 and November 2021. Women younger than 37 years who underwent single elective ET were included and all women had anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels ≥ 1.5 ng/ml. Age, body mass index (BMI), AMH levels, and pregnancy outcomes as clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were analyzed. RESULTS: Study population consisted of 75 women in the G-Rinse medium solution group and 97 women in the physiologic saline group. Clinical pregnancy rate was 58.7% and 61.9% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.673), and LBR was calculated as 41.3% and 47.4% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.430). A log-binomial regression model was used and the model was adjusted for BMI to evaluate the effect of the cervical mucus washing method on the pregnancy outcomes. There was an estimated 5% decrease in the relative risk for CPR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.2, p = 0.673). There was an estimated 13% reduction in the relative risk for LBR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.62 to 1.23, p = 0.430). They were both statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In our study, the replacement of using G-Rinse medium solution to physiologic saline solution for cervical cleaning did not change CPR and LBR outcomes. Using physiologic saline solution can be a good alternative approach for ectocervical washing during embryo transfer in selected population because of its lower costs, easy accessibility, and common use. Springer US 2023-02-14 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9925918/ /pubmed/36786949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02747-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
spellingShingle Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Gursu, Turkan
Eraslan, Alper
Angun, Berk
Celik, Hale Goksever
Yeh, John
Bastu, Ercan
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers
title Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers
title_full Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers
title_fullStr Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers
title_short Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers
title_sort comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or g-rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers
topic Assisted Reproduction Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02747-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gursuturkan comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers
AT eraslanalper comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers
AT angunberk comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers
AT celikhalegoksever comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers
AT yehjohn comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers
AT bastuercan comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers