Cargando…
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers
AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between physiologic saline and G-Rinse medium solution for cervical mucus washing, in fresh elective single-embryo transfers (ET) in women under the age of 37. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective data analysis performed in a single in vitro fertiliza...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02747-6 |
_version_ | 1784888160500580352 |
---|---|
author | Gursu, Turkan Eraslan, Alper Angun, Berk Celik, Hale Goksever Yeh, John Bastu, Ercan |
author_facet | Gursu, Turkan Eraslan, Alper Angun, Berk Celik, Hale Goksever Yeh, John Bastu, Ercan |
author_sort | Gursu, Turkan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between physiologic saline and G-Rinse medium solution for cervical mucus washing, in fresh elective single-embryo transfers (ET) in women under the age of 37. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective data analysis performed in a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) center between February 2018 and November 2021. Women younger than 37 years who underwent single elective ET were included and all women had anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels ≥ 1.5 ng/ml. Age, body mass index (BMI), AMH levels, and pregnancy outcomes as clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were analyzed. RESULTS: Study population consisted of 75 women in the G-Rinse medium solution group and 97 women in the physiologic saline group. Clinical pregnancy rate was 58.7% and 61.9% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.673), and LBR was calculated as 41.3% and 47.4% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.430). A log-binomial regression model was used and the model was adjusted for BMI to evaluate the effect of the cervical mucus washing method on the pregnancy outcomes. There was an estimated 5% decrease in the relative risk for CPR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.2, p = 0.673). There was an estimated 13% reduction in the relative risk for LBR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.62 to 1.23, p = 0.430). They were both statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In our study, the replacement of using G-Rinse medium solution to physiologic saline solution for cervical cleaning did not change CPR and LBR outcomes. Using physiologic saline solution can be a good alternative approach for ectocervical washing during embryo transfer in selected population because of its lower costs, easy accessibility, and common use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9925918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99259182023-02-14 Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers Gursu, Turkan Eraslan, Alper Angun, Berk Celik, Hale Goksever Yeh, John Bastu, Ercan J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies AIM: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between physiologic saline and G-Rinse medium solution for cervical mucus washing, in fresh elective single-embryo transfers (ET) in women under the age of 37. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective data analysis performed in a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) center between February 2018 and November 2021. Women younger than 37 years who underwent single elective ET were included and all women had anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels ≥ 1.5 ng/ml. Age, body mass index (BMI), AMH levels, and pregnancy outcomes as clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were analyzed. RESULTS: Study population consisted of 75 women in the G-Rinse medium solution group and 97 women in the physiologic saline group. Clinical pregnancy rate was 58.7% and 61.9% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.673), and LBR was calculated as 41.3% and 47.4% in the G-Rinse medium solution group and saline group, respectively (p = 0.430). A log-binomial regression model was used and the model was adjusted for BMI to evaluate the effect of the cervical mucus washing method on the pregnancy outcomes. There was an estimated 5% decrease in the relative risk for CPR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.2, p = 0.673). There was an estimated 13% reduction in the relative risk for LBR in the G-Rinse medium solution group compared to the saline group (95% CI: 0.62 to 1.23, p = 0.430). They were both statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: In our study, the replacement of using G-Rinse medium solution to physiologic saline solution for cervical cleaning did not change CPR and LBR outcomes. Using physiologic saline solution can be a good alternative approach for ectocervical washing during embryo transfer in selected population because of its lower costs, easy accessibility, and common use. Springer US 2023-02-14 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9925918/ /pubmed/36786949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02747-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
spellingShingle | Assisted Reproduction Technologies Gursu, Turkan Eraslan, Alper Angun, Berk Celik, Hale Goksever Yeh, John Bastu, Ercan Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers |
title | Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers |
title_full | Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers |
title_fullStr | Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers |
title_short | Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or G-Rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers |
title_sort | comparison of pregnancy outcomes of cervical mucus washing with physiologic saline solution or g-rinse medium solution, in elective single-embryo transfers |
topic | Assisted Reproduction Technologies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02747-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gursuturkan comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers AT eraslanalper comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers AT angunberk comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers AT celikhalegoksever comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers AT yehjohn comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers AT bastuercan comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesofcervicalmucuswashingwithphysiologicsalinesolutionorgrinsemediumsolutioninelectivesingleembryotransfers |