Cargando…
A new method for predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients through a combination of multiple tumor-associated macrophage markers at the invasive front
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are closely related to tumorigenesis and metastasis of multiple cancer types. The infiltration of TAMs is used for predicting the prognosis of cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the density and prognostic significance of M1 and M2 TAM phenotypes...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36798759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13211 |
Sumario: | Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are closely related to tumorigenesis and metastasis of multiple cancer types. The infiltration of TAMs is used for predicting the prognosis of cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the density and prognostic significance of M1 and M2 TAM phenotypes in the intratumor versus the invasive front (IF) are largely unknown in CRC. In this study, CD68 was selected as a general marker of TAMs, CD11c, NOS2 and CXCL10 as markers for M1 phenotype and CD163, CD206, CD115 as markers for M2 phenotype. Firstly, immunohistochemistry staining and double-labeling immunofluorescence staining showed that M1 molecular markers (NOS2, CXCL10, CD11c) were lowly expressed at both IF and intratumor, while M2 molecular markers (CD163, CD206, CD115) were highly expressed mainly at IF. Moreover, we also demonstrated that three M1 molecular markers including NOS2, CXCL10 and CD11c were correlated to each other. Meanwhile, three M2 molecular markers including CD163, CD206, and CD115 were also correlated to each other. Patients with low expression of three M1 molecular markers (NOS2/CXCL10/CD11c) exhibited low overall survival (OS) rate, whereas patients with high expression of three M2 molecular markers (CD163/CD206/CD115) exhibited low OS rate. We also observed that the prognostic value of treble markers combination (NOS2/CXCL10/CD11c or CD163/CD206/CD115) was superior to that of single marker. Together, our results reveal the combination of treble TAMs markers (NOS2/CXCL10/CD11c or CD163/CD206/CD115) could better evaluate the prognosis of CRC patients, which might be used as a more comprehensive method for predicting the prognosis of CRC patients. |
---|