Cargando…
An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial
OBJECTIVE: To provide a framework for conducting clinical trial site visits virtually over videoconference, and to report on our experience doing so during the twelve-year follow-up of the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial. DESIGN: Using published FDA guidance and prior literat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36798735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100337 |
_version_ | 1784888229497929728 |
---|---|
author | McHugh, Claire G. Gottreich, Julia R. Kumara, Mahima T. Selzer, Faith Collins, Jamie E. Losina, Elena Katz, Jeffrey N. |
author_facet | McHugh, Claire G. Gottreich, Julia R. Kumara, Mahima T. Selzer, Faith Collins, Jamie E. Losina, Elena Katz, Jeffrey N. |
author_sort | McHugh, Claire G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To provide a framework for conducting clinical trial site visits virtually over videoconference, and to report on our experience doing so during the twelve-year follow-up of the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial. DESIGN: Using published FDA guidance and prior literature, we created a structure for virtual site visits that prioritized monitoring for protocol compliance, safety, and data integrity. We conducted site visits in three stages: preparation for the visit, the virtual meeting itself, and follow-up. The preparation phase involved a review of relevant site-specific documents and a written report on the findings prior to the visit. The virtual visit itself was focused on any questions the site staff had about the pre-visit report, observing a mock study visit, touring physical spaces, and understanding the site staff's work environment. In the follow-up phase, we wrote a post-visit report summarizing the discussion during the visit and feedback given by the coordinating site. RESULTS: We found that the virtual site visits conducted as part of the MeTeOR trial follow-up ran smoothly. Although we could not directly compare in-person and virtual site visits, site staff unanimously appreciated the efficiency and effectiveness of the virtual site visits. We noted that displaying physical workspaces over videoconferencing was difficult, and a notable drawback to this method. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first published framework for conducting virtual clinical trial site visits. Conducting these visits virtually confer several advantages in terms of time, money, and efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9926209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99262092023-02-15 An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial McHugh, Claire G. Gottreich, Julia R. Kumara, Mahima T. Selzer, Faith Collins, Jamie E. Losina, Elena Katz, Jeffrey N. Osteoarthr Cartil Open ORIGINAL PAPER OBJECTIVE: To provide a framework for conducting clinical trial site visits virtually over videoconference, and to report on our experience doing so during the twelve-year follow-up of the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial. DESIGN: Using published FDA guidance and prior literature, we created a structure for virtual site visits that prioritized monitoring for protocol compliance, safety, and data integrity. We conducted site visits in three stages: preparation for the visit, the virtual meeting itself, and follow-up. The preparation phase involved a review of relevant site-specific documents and a written report on the findings prior to the visit. The virtual visit itself was focused on any questions the site staff had about the pre-visit report, observing a mock study visit, touring physical spaces, and understanding the site staff's work environment. In the follow-up phase, we wrote a post-visit report summarizing the discussion during the visit and feedback given by the coordinating site. RESULTS: We found that the virtual site visits conducted as part of the MeTeOR trial follow-up ran smoothly. Although we could not directly compare in-person and virtual site visits, site staff unanimously appreciated the efficiency and effectiveness of the virtual site visits. We noted that displaying physical workspaces over videoconferencing was difficult, and a notable drawback to this method. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first published framework for conducting virtual clinical trial site visits. Conducting these visits virtually confer several advantages in terms of time, money, and efficiency. Elsevier 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9926209/ /pubmed/36798735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100337 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL PAPER McHugh, Claire G. Gottreich, Julia R. Kumara, Mahima T. Selzer, Faith Collins, Jamie E. Losina, Elena Katz, Jeffrey N. An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial |
title | An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial |
title_full | An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial |
title_fullStr | An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial |
title_full_unstemmed | An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial |
title_short | An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial |
title_sort | approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: lessons from the meteor trial |
topic | ORIGINAL PAPER |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36798735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mchughclaireg anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT gottreichjuliar anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT kumaramahimat anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT selzerfaith anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT collinsjamiee anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT losinaelena anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT katzjeffreyn anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT mchughclaireg approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT gottreichjuliar approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT kumaramahimat approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT selzerfaith approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT collinsjamiee approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT losinaelena approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial AT katzjeffreyn approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial |