Cargando…

An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial

OBJECTIVE: To provide a framework for conducting clinical trial site visits virtually over videoconference, and to report on our experience doing so during the twelve-year follow-up of the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial. DESIGN: Using published FDA guidance and prior literat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McHugh, Claire G., Gottreich, Julia R., Kumara, Mahima T., Selzer, Faith, Collins, Jamie E., Losina, Elena, Katz, Jeffrey N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36798735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100337
_version_ 1784888229497929728
author McHugh, Claire G.
Gottreich, Julia R.
Kumara, Mahima T.
Selzer, Faith
Collins, Jamie E.
Losina, Elena
Katz, Jeffrey N.
author_facet McHugh, Claire G.
Gottreich, Julia R.
Kumara, Mahima T.
Selzer, Faith
Collins, Jamie E.
Losina, Elena
Katz, Jeffrey N.
author_sort McHugh, Claire G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To provide a framework for conducting clinical trial site visits virtually over videoconference, and to report on our experience doing so during the twelve-year follow-up of the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial. DESIGN: Using published FDA guidance and prior literature, we created a structure for virtual site visits that prioritized monitoring for protocol compliance, safety, and data integrity. We conducted site visits in three stages: preparation for the visit, the virtual meeting itself, and follow-up. The preparation phase involved a review of relevant site-specific documents and a written report on the findings prior to the visit. The virtual visit itself was focused on any questions the site staff had about the pre-visit report, observing a mock study visit, touring physical spaces, and understanding the site staff's work environment. In the follow-up phase, we wrote a post-visit report summarizing the discussion during the visit and feedback given by the coordinating site. RESULTS: We found that the virtual site visits conducted as part of the MeTeOR trial follow-up ran smoothly. Although we could not directly compare in-person and virtual site visits, site staff unanimously appreciated the efficiency and effectiveness of the virtual site visits. We noted that displaying physical workspaces over videoconferencing was difficult, and a notable drawback to this method. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first published framework for conducting virtual clinical trial site visits. Conducting these visits virtually confer several advantages in terms of time, money, and efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9926209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99262092023-02-15 An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial McHugh, Claire G. Gottreich, Julia R. Kumara, Mahima T. Selzer, Faith Collins, Jamie E. Losina, Elena Katz, Jeffrey N. Osteoarthr Cartil Open ORIGINAL PAPER OBJECTIVE: To provide a framework for conducting clinical trial site visits virtually over videoconference, and to report on our experience doing so during the twelve-year follow-up of the Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) trial. DESIGN: Using published FDA guidance and prior literature, we created a structure for virtual site visits that prioritized monitoring for protocol compliance, safety, and data integrity. We conducted site visits in three stages: preparation for the visit, the virtual meeting itself, and follow-up. The preparation phase involved a review of relevant site-specific documents and a written report on the findings prior to the visit. The virtual visit itself was focused on any questions the site staff had about the pre-visit report, observing a mock study visit, touring physical spaces, and understanding the site staff's work environment. In the follow-up phase, we wrote a post-visit report summarizing the discussion during the visit and feedback given by the coordinating site. RESULTS: We found that the virtual site visits conducted as part of the MeTeOR trial follow-up ran smoothly. Although we could not directly compare in-person and virtual site visits, site staff unanimously appreciated the efficiency and effectiveness of the virtual site visits. We noted that displaying physical workspaces over videoconferencing was difficult, and a notable drawback to this method. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first published framework for conducting virtual clinical trial site visits. Conducting these visits virtually confer several advantages in terms of time, money, and efficiency. Elsevier 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9926209/ /pubmed/36798735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100337 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle ORIGINAL PAPER
McHugh, Claire G.
Gottreich, Julia R.
Kumara, Mahima T.
Selzer, Faith
Collins, Jamie E.
Losina, Elena
Katz, Jeffrey N.
An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial
title An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial
title_full An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial
title_fullStr An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial
title_full_unstemmed An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial
title_short An approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: Lessons from the MeTeOR trial
title_sort approach to virtual clinical trial site visits: lessons from the meteor trial
topic ORIGINAL PAPER
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36798735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100337
work_keys_str_mv AT mchughclaireg anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT gottreichjuliar anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT kumaramahimat anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT selzerfaith anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT collinsjamiee anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT losinaelena anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT katzjeffreyn anapproachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT mchughclaireg approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT gottreichjuliar approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT kumaramahimat approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT selzerfaith approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT collinsjamiee approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT losinaelena approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial
AT katzjeffreyn approachtovirtualclinicaltrialsitevisitslessonsfromthemeteortrial