Cargando…
Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
BACKGROUND: Priority patients in primary care include people from low-income, rural, or culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and First Nations people. AIM: To describe the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools that have been tested by family doctors wo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37126578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328 |
_version_ | 1784888248951111680 |
---|---|
author | Ball, Lauren Brickley, Bryce Williams, Lauren T Advocat, Jenny Rieger, Elizabeth Ng, Raeann Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Clark, Alexander M Sturgiss, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Ball, Lauren Brickley, Bryce Williams, Lauren T Advocat, Jenny Rieger, Elizabeth Ng, Raeann Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Clark, Alexander M Sturgiss, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Ball, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Priority patients in primary care include people from low-income, rural, or culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and First Nations people. AIM: To describe the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools that have been tested by family doctors working with priority patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: A global systematic review. METHOD: Five databases were searched for studies published from 2000 to 2021, of any design, that tested the effectiveness or feasibility of tangible, publicly available behaviour change tools used by family doctors working with priority patients. The methodological quality of each study was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Thirteen of 4931 studies screened met the eligibility criteria, and described 12 tools. The health-related behaviours targeted included smoking, diet and/or physical activity, alcohol and/or drug use, and suicidal ideation. Six tools had an online/web/app-based focus; the remaining six utilised only printed materials and/or in-person training. The effectiveness of the tools was assessed in 11 studies, which used diverse methods, with promising results for enabling behaviour change. The nine studies that assessed feasibility found that the tools were easy to use and enhanced the perceived quality of care. CONCLUSION: Many of the identified behaviour change tools were demonstrated to be effective at facilitating change in a target behaviour and/or feasible for use in practice. The tools varied across factors, such as the mode of delivery and the way the tool was intended to influence behaviour. There is clear opportunity to build on existing tools to enable family doctors to assist priority patients towards achieving healthier lifestyles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9926293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99262932023-02-15 Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review Ball, Lauren Brickley, Bryce Williams, Lauren T Advocat, Jenny Rieger, Elizabeth Ng, Raeann Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Clark, Alexander M Sturgiss, Elizabeth Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Priority patients in primary care include people from low-income, rural, or culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and First Nations people. AIM: To describe the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools that have been tested by family doctors working with priority patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: A global systematic review. METHOD: Five databases were searched for studies published from 2000 to 2021, of any design, that tested the effectiveness or feasibility of tangible, publicly available behaviour change tools used by family doctors working with priority patients. The methodological quality of each study was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Thirteen of 4931 studies screened met the eligibility criteria, and described 12 tools. The health-related behaviours targeted included smoking, diet and/or physical activity, alcohol and/or drug use, and suicidal ideation. Six tools had an online/web/app-based focus; the remaining six utilised only printed materials and/or in-person training. The effectiveness of the tools was assessed in 11 studies, which used diverse methods, with promising results for enabling behaviour change. The nine studies that assessed feasibility found that the tools were easy to use and enhanced the perceived quality of care. CONCLUSION: Many of the identified behaviour change tools were demonstrated to be effective at facilitating change in a target behaviour and/or feasible for use in practice. The tools varied across factors, such as the mode of delivery and the way the tool was intended to influence behaviour. There is clear opportunity to build on existing tools to enable family doctors to assist priority patients towards achieving healthier lifestyles. Royal College of General Practitioners 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9926293/ /pubmed/37126578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Research Ball, Lauren Brickley, Bryce Williams, Lauren T Advocat, Jenny Rieger, Elizabeth Ng, Raeann Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Clark, Alexander M Sturgiss, Elizabeth Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review |
title | Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review |
title_full | Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review |
title_short | Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review |
title_sort | effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37126578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balllauren effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview AT brickleybryce effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview AT williamslaurent effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview AT advocatjenny effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview AT riegerelizabeth effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview AT ngraeann effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview AT gunatillakanilakshi effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview AT clarkalexanderm effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview AT sturgisselizabeth effectivenessfeasibilityandacceptabilityofbehaviourchangetoolsusedbyfamilydoctorsaglobalsystematicreview |