Cargando…

REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’

BACKGROUND: We assessed potential consent bias in a cohort of > 40,000 adult patients asked by mail after hospitalization to consent to the use of past, present and future clinical and biological data in an ongoing ‘general consent’ program at a large tertiary hospital in Switzerland. METHODS: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosmani, Cristina, Carboni, Sonia, Samer, Caroline, Lovis, Christian, Perneger, Thomas, Huttner, Angela, Hirschel, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36782161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00877-7
_version_ 1784888324436000768
author Bosmani, Cristina
Carboni, Sonia
Samer, Caroline
Lovis, Christian
Perneger, Thomas
Huttner, Angela
Hirschel, Bernard
author_facet Bosmani, Cristina
Carboni, Sonia
Samer, Caroline
Lovis, Christian
Perneger, Thomas
Huttner, Angela
Hirschel, Bernard
author_sort Bosmani, Cristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We assessed potential consent bias in a cohort of > 40,000 adult patients asked by mail after hospitalization to consent to the use of past, present and future clinical and biological data in an ongoing ‘general consent’ program at a large tertiary hospital in Switzerland. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all adult patients hospitalized between April 2019 and March 2020 were invited to participate to the general consent program. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from patients’ electronic health records (EHR). Data of those who provided written consent (signatories) and non-responders were compared and analyzed with R studio. RESULTS: Of 44,819 patients approached, 10,299 (23%) signed the form. Signatories were older (median age 54 [IQR 38–72] vs. 44 years [IQR 32–60], p < .0001), more comorbid (2614/10,299 [25.4%] vs. 4912/28,676 [17.1%] with Charlson comorbidity index ≤ 4, p < .0001), and more often of Swiss nationality (6592/10,299 [64%] vs. 13,813/28,676 [48.2%], p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that actively seeking consent creates a bias and compromises the external validity of data obtained via ‘general consent’ programs. Other options, such as opt-out consent procedures, should be further assessed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-022-00877-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9926654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99266542023-02-15 REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’ Bosmani, Cristina Carboni, Sonia Samer, Caroline Lovis, Christian Perneger, Thomas Huttner, Angela Hirschel, Bernard BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: We assessed potential consent bias in a cohort of > 40,000 adult patients asked by mail after hospitalization to consent to the use of past, present and future clinical and biological data in an ongoing ‘general consent’ program at a large tertiary hospital in Switzerland. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all adult patients hospitalized between April 2019 and March 2020 were invited to participate to the general consent program. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from patients’ electronic health records (EHR). Data of those who provided written consent (signatories) and non-responders were compared and analyzed with R studio. RESULTS: Of 44,819 patients approached, 10,299 (23%) signed the form. Signatories were older (median age 54 [IQR 38–72] vs. 44 years [IQR 32–60], p < .0001), more comorbid (2614/10,299 [25.4%] vs. 4912/28,676 [17.1%] with Charlson comorbidity index ≤ 4, p < .0001), and more often of Swiss nationality (6592/10,299 [64%] vs. 13,813/28,676 [48.2%], p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that actively seeking consent creates a bias and compromises the external validity of data obtained via ‘general consent’ programs. Other options, such as opt-out consent procedures, should be further assessed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-022-00877-7. BioMed Central 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9926654/ /pubmed/36782161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00877-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bosmani, Cristina
Carboni, Sonia
Samer, Caroline
Lovis, Christian
Perneger, Thomas
Huttner, Angela
Hirschel, Bernard
REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’
title REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’
title_full REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’
title_fullStr REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’
title_full_unstemmed REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’
title_short REPRESENT: REPresentativeness of RESearch data obtained through the ‘General Informed ConsENT’
title_sort represent: representativeness of research data obtained through the ‘general informed consent’
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36782161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00877-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bosmanicristina representrepresentativenessofresearchdataobtainedthroughthegeneralinformedconsent
AT carbonisonia representrepresentativenessofresearchdataobtainedthroughthegeneralinformedconsent
AT samercaroline representrepresentativenessofresearchdataobtainedthroughthegeneralinformedconsent
AT lovischristian representrepresentativenessofresearchdataobtainedthroughthegeneralinformedconsent
AT pernegerthomas representrepresentativenessofresearchdataobtainedthroughthegeneralinformedconsent
AT huttnerangela representrepresentativenessofresearchdataobtainedthroughthegeneralinformedconsent
AT hirschelbernard representrepresentativenessofresearchdataobtainedthroughthegeneralinformedconsent