Cargando…

‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany

BACKGROUND: Given low utilization by individuals experiencing gambling problems the potential of self-exclusion (SE) might be not fully exploited in Germany. This paper aims to gain insight into different actors’ perceptions and reflections on the problems and difficulties in the process of self-exc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraus, Ludwig, Bickl, Andreas, Sedlacek, Lucia, Schwarzkopf, Larissa, Örnberg, Jenny Cisneros, Loy, Johanna K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36788494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15117-9
_version_ 1784888327743209472
author Kraus, Ludwig
Bickl, Andreas
Sedlacek, Lucia
Schwarzkopf, Larissa
Örnberg, Jenny Cisneros
Loy, Johanna K.
author_facet Kraus, Ludwig
Bickl, Andreas
Sedlacek, Lucia
Schwarzkopf, Larissa
Örnberg, Jenny Cisneros
Loy, Johanna K.
author_sort Kraus, Ludwig
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Given low utilization by individuals experiencing gambling problems the potential of self-exclusion (SE) might be not fully exploited in Germany. This paper aims to gain insight into different actors’ perceptions and reflections on the problems and difficulties in the process of self-exclusion to delineate which specific attitudes hamper a successful implementation of SE. METHODS: 13 individual and four group interviews with individuals experiencing gambling problems and governmental or commercial gambling providers were examined. A Grounded Theory Approach was used to portray the opinions of these different actors on existing regulations of SE and to delineate potentially diverging interests between the distinct groups. RESULTS: The interviewees agreed on the usefulness of SE and consented that it is important to early recognize individuals experiencing gambling problems. They also considered the present practice insufficient but for different reasons. Individuals experiencing gambling problems and providers particularly disagreed on addressing individuals experiencing gambling problems. While individuals experiencing gambling problems stated that they had hardly ever been approached, providers argued that help offers were mostly rejected. Especially commercial providers also regarded insufficient German language skills and rapid fluctuation of guests as strong barriers to approaching individuals experiencing gambling problems. Interviewees from governmental venues furthermore suspected that commercial providers took addressing individuals experiencing gambling problems less seriously. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the dilemma of conflicting interests in both individuals experiencing gambling problems and providers. Rather than acting against the economic interests of employers, venue staff blame individuals experiencing gambling problems for lack of problem recognition. Conversely, individuals experiencing gambling problems blame the providers for not offering help. To address individuals experiencing gambling problems appropriate staff training is required, and SE regulations need to be controlled by an independent body rather than by the providers themselves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9926676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99266762023-02-15 ‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany Kraus, Ludwig Bickl, Andreas Sedlacek, Lucia Schwarzkopf, Larissa Örnberg, Jenny Cisneros Loy, Johanna K. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Given low utilization by individuals experiencing gambling problems the potential of self-exclusion (SE) might be not fully exploited in Germany. This paper aims to gain insight into different actors’ perceptions and reflections on the problems and difficulties in the process of self-exclusion to delineate which specific attitudes hamper a successful implementation of SE. METHODS: 13 individual and four group interviews with individuals experiencing gambling problems and governmental or commercial gambling providers were examined. A Grounded Theory Approach was used to portray the opinions of these different actors on existing regulations of SE and to delineate potentially diverging interests between the distinct groups. RESULTS: The interviewees agreed on the usefulness of SE and consented that it is important to early recognize individuals experiencing gambling problems. They also considered the present practice insufficient but for different reasons. Individuals experiencing gambling problems and providers particularly disagreed on addressing individuals experiencing gambling problems. While individuals experiencing gambling problems stated that they had hardly ever been approached, providers argued that help offers were mostly rejected. Especially commercial providers also regarded insufficient German language skills and rapid fluctuation of guests as strong barriers to approaching individuals experiencing gambling problems. Interviewees from governmental venues furthermore suspected that commercial providers took addressing individuals experiencing gambling problems less seriously. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the dilemma of conflicting interests in both individuals experiencing gambling problems and providers. Rather than acting against the economic interests of employers, venue staff blame individuals experiencing gambling problems for lack of problem recognition. Conversely, individuals experiencing gambling problems blame the providers for not offering help. To address individuals experiencing gambling problems appropriate staff training is required, and SE regulations need to be controlled by an independent body rather than by the providers themselves. BioMed Central 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9926676/ /pubmed/36788494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15117-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kraus, Ludwig
Bickl, Andreas
Sedlacek, Lucia
Schwarzkopf, Larissa
Örnberg, Jenny Cisneros
Loy, Johanna K.
‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany
title ‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany
title_full ‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany
title_fullStr ‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany
title_full_unstemmed ‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany
title_short ‘We are not the ones to blame’. Gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in Germany
title_sort ‘we are not the ones to blame’. gamblers’ and providers’ appraisal of self-exclusion in germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36788494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15117-9
work_keys_str_mv AT krausludwig wearenottheonestoblamegamblersandprovidersappraisalofselfexclusioningermany
AT bicklandreas wearenottheonestoblamegamblersandprovidersappraisalofselfexclusioningermany
AT sedlaceklucia wearenottheonestoblamegamblersandprovidersappraisalofselfexclusioningermany
AT schwarzkopflarissa wearenottheonestoblamegamblersandprovidersappraisalofselfexclusioningermany
AT ornbergjennycisneros wearenottheonestoblamegamblersandprovidersappraisalofselfexclusioningermany
AT loyjohannak wearenottheonestoblamegamblersandprovidersappraisalofselfexclusioningermany