Cargando…
A Matching Strategy To Guide Donor Selection for Ulcerative Colitis in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) targeting gut microbiota has recently been applied to the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, preliminary trials showed that only a subset of patients responded to FMT, and the heterogeneity in donor gut microbiota probably played important roles in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02159-21 |
_version_ | 1784888439675551744 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Bangzhou Yang, Luxi Ning, Hanbing Cao, Man Chen, Zhangran Chen, Qiongyun Lian, Guanghui Tang, Hailing Wang, Qizhi Wang, Junping Lin, Zhihui Wen, Jianbo Liu, Yuedong Xuan, Ji Li, Xuejun Lin, Aiqiang He, Jianquan Zhang, Lei Hou, Xiaohua Zeng, Qiang Xiao, Chuanxing |
author_facet | Zhang, Bangzhou Yang, Luxi Ning, Hanbing Cao, Man Chen, Zhangran Chen, Qiongyun Lian, Guanghui Tang, Hailing Wang, Qizhi Wang, Junping Lin, Zhihui Wen, Jianbo Liu, Yuedong Xuan, Ji Li, Xuejun Lin, Aiqiang He, Jianquan Zhang, Lei Hou, Xiaohua Zeng, Qiang Xiao, Chuanxing |
author_sort | Zhang, Bangzhou |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) targeting gut microbiota has recently been applied to the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, preliminary trials showed that only a subset of patients responded to FMT, and the heterogeneity in donor gut microbiota probably played important roles in patients’ responses, implying the significance of matching an appropriate donor to a specified patient. We developed a strategy to build a donor-recipient matching model to guide rational donor selection for UC in FMT. We collected and uniformly reanalyzed 656 fecal 16S rRNA gene sequencing samples (350 from UC patients and 306 from healthy subjects) from 9 studies. Significantly lower α-diversity indexes were observed in UC patients by random effects model. Thirty-four bacterial genera and 34 predicted pathways were identified with significant odds ratios and classification potentials for UC patients. Based on six bacterial indicators, including richness, overall distance, genera, and pathways (beneficial and harmful), the analytic hierarchy process-based donor-recipient matching model was set to rank and select appropriate donors for patients with UC. Finally, the model showed favorable classification powers (>70%) for FMT effectiveness in two previous clinical trials. This study revealed the dysbiosis of fecal bacterial diversity, composition, and predicted pathways of patients with UC by meta-analysis and hereby developed a donor-recipient matching strategy to guide donor selection for UC in FMT. This strategy can also be applied to other diseases associated with gut microbiota. IMPORTANCE Modulation of gut microbiota by FMT from donors has been applied to the treatment of UC and yielded variable effectiveness in clinical trials. One possibility is that this variable effectiveness was related to donor selection, as a patient’s response to FMT may rely on the capability of the used donor’s microbiota to restore the specific gut disturbances of the patient. However, the biggest issues on the practical level are what should be considered in the selection process and how to set up such a donor-recipient matching model. In this study, we presented a bacterial profile-based donor-recipient matching strategy to guide donor selection for UC in FMT by first meta-analysis of 656 fecal 16S rRNA gene sequencing samples from 9 studies to identify significant indicators and then setting up the model by an analytic hierarchy process. The applicability and accuracy of this model were verified in the data sets from two previous FMT clinical studies. Our data indicate that the donor-recipient matching model built in this study enables researchers to rationally select donors for UC patients in FMT clinical practice, although it needs more samples and prospective trials for validation. The strategy adopted in this study to leverage existing data sets to build donor-recipient matching models for precision FMT is feasible for other diseases associated with gut microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9927247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99272472023-02-15 A Matching Strategy To Guide Donor Selection for Ulcerative Colitis in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process Zhang, Bangzhou Yang, Luxi Ning, Hanbing Cao, Man Chen, Zhangran Chen, Qiongyun Lian, Guanghui Tang, Hailing Wang, Qizhi Wang, Junping Lin, Zhihui Wen, Jianbo Liu, Yuedong Xuan, Ji Li, Xuejun Lin, Aiqiang He, Jianquan Zhang, Lei Hou, Xiaohua Zeng, Qiang Xiao, Chuanxing Microbiol Spectr Research Article Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) targeting gut microbiota has recently been applied to the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, preliminary trials showed that only a subset of patients responded to FMT, and the heterogeneity in donor gut microbiota probably played important roles in patients’ responses, implying the significance of matching an appropriate donor to a specified patient. We developed a strategy to build a donor-recipient matching model to guide rational donor selection for UC in FMT. We collected and uniformly reanalyzed 656 fecal 16S rRNA gene sequencing samples (350 from UC patients and 306 from healthy subjects) from 9 studies. Significantly lower α-diversity indexes were observed in UC patients by random effects model. Thirty-four bacterial genera and 34 predicted pathways were identified with significant odds ratios and classification potentials for UC patients. Based on six bacterial indicators, including richness, overall distance, genera, and pathways (beneficial and harmful), the analytic hierarchy process-based donor-recipient matching model was set to rank and select appropriate donors for patients with UC. Finally, the model showed favorable classification powers (>70%) for FMT effectiveness in two previous clinical trials. This study revealed the dysbiosis of fecal bacterial diversity, composition, and predicted pathways of patients with UC by meta-analysis and hereby developed a donor-recipient matching strategy to guide donor selection for UC in FMT. This strategy can also be applied to other diseases associated with gut microbiota. IMPORTANCE Modulation of gut microbiota by FMT from donors has been applied to the treatment of UC and yielded variable effectiveness in clinical trials. One possibility is that this variable effectiveness was related to donor selection, as a patient’s response to FMT may rely on the capability of the used donor’s microbiota to restore the specific gut disturbances of the patient. However, the biggest issues on the practical level are what should be considered in the selection process and how to set up such a donor-recipient matching model. In this study, we presented a bacterial profile-based donor-recipient matching strategy to guide donor selection for UC in FMT by first meta-analysis of 656 fecal 16S rRNA gene sequencing samples from 9 studies to identify significant indicators and then setting up the model by an analytic hierarchy process. The applicability and accuracy of this model were verified in the data sets from two previous FMT clinical studies. Our data indicate that the donor-recipient matching model built in this study enables researchers to rationally select donors for UC patients in FMT clinical practice, although it needs more samples and prospective trials for validation. The strategy adopted in this study to leverage existing data sets to build donor-recipient matching models for precision FMT is feasible for other diseases associated with gut microbiota. American Society for Microbiology 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9927247/ /pubmed/36472435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02159-21 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Bangzhou Yang, Luxi Ning, Hanbing Cao, Man Chen, Zhangran Chen, Qiongyun Lian, Guanghui Tang, Hailing Wang, Qizhi Wang, Junping Lin, Zhihui Wen, Jianbo Liu, Yuedong Xuan, Ji Li, Xuejun Lin, Aiqiang He, Jianquan Zhang, Lei Hou, Xiaohua Zeng, Qiang Xiao, Chuanxing A Matching Strategy To Guide Donor Selection for Ulcerative Colitis in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title | A Matching Strategy To Guide Donor Selection for Ulcerative Colitis in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_full | A Matching Strategy To Guide Donor Selection for Ulcerative Colitis in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_fullStr | A Matching Strategy To Guide Donor Selection for Ulcerative Colitis in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_full_unstemmed | A Matching Strategy To Guide Donor Selection for Ulcerative Colitis in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_short | A Matching Strategy To Guide Donor Selection for Ulcerative Colitis in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Meta-Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process |
title_sort | matching strategy to guide donor selection for ulcerative colitis in fecal microbiota transplantation: meta-analysis and analytic hierarchy process |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02159-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangbangzhou amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT yangluxi amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT ninghanbing amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT caoman amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT chenzhangran amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT chenqiongyun amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT lianguanghui amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT tanghailing amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT wangqizhi amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT wangjunping amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT linzhihui amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT wenjianbo amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT liuyuedong amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT xuanji amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT lixuejun amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT linaiqiang amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT hejianquan amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT zhanglei amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT houxiaohua amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT zengqiang amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT xiaochuanxing amatchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT zhangbangzhou matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT yangluxi matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT ninghanbing matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT caoman matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT chenzhangran matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT chenqiongyun matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT lianguanghui matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT tanghailing matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT wangqizhi matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT wangjunping matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT linzhihui matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT wenjianbo matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT liuyuedong matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT xuanji matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT lixuejun matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT linaiqiang matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT hejianquan matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT zhanglei matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT houxiaohua matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT zengqiang matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess AT xiaochuanxing matchingstrategytoguidedonorselectionforulcerativecolitisinfecalmicrobiotatransplantationmetaanalysisandanalytichierarchyprocess |