Cargando…

Test Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel

The test performance and potential clinical utility of the ePlex blood culture identification Gram-negative (BCID-GN) panel was evaluated relative to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry on bacterial isolates and conventional antimicrobial suscepti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	McCarty, T. P., Cumagun, P., Meeder, J., Moates, D., Edwards, W. S., Hutchinson, J., Lee, R. A., Leal, S. M.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36688641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.04092-22

Ejemplares similares

214. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Negative Panel
por: Meeder, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
por: Meeder, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

1022. Evaluating the Impact of GenMark Dx ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) on Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections
por: Cumagun, Pia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

359. The Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex® Fungal Blood Culture Identification Panel
por: Carmona, Stefania, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The impact of GenMark Dx ePlex blood-culture identification on the treatment and outcomes of gram-positive bacteremia
por: Kiszla, B. Matthew, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

1027. Earlier Is Better: Progress Toward Decreased Time to Optimal Therapy and Improved Antibiotic Stewardship for Gram-positive Bloodstream Infections Through Use of GenMark Dx ePlex system
por: White, Cameron, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
por: Carroll, Karen C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
por: Wolk, Donna M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

82. Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns Following Implementation of the GenMark ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Panel for Gram-positive Bloodstream Infections
por: Wein, Megan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
por: van Asten, Suzanne A. V., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

1143 GenMark ESensor Respiratory Viral Panel in an Inpatient Pediatric Population
por: Oliver, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

2174. Comparison of the Verigene® and the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels for Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections
por: Johnson, J Kristie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

285. Evaluation of the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels for Gram-positive/Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts
por: Chapin, Kimberle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
por: Huang, Te-Din, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparative Performance of the Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel, GenMark eSensor Respiratory Viral Panel, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel
por: Popowitch, Elena B., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

164. Performance of ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels in Clinical Isolates and Characterization of Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities
por: Thomas, Jenni, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evaluation of point of care testing platform (ePLEX) for respiratory viral diagnosis
por: Guerendiain, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Multicenter Evaluation of the ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Tract Pathogens in Nasopharyngeal Swabs
por: Babady, N. Esther, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clinical implications of rapid ePlex® Respiratory Pathogen Panel testing compared to laboratory-developed real-time PCR
por: van Rijn, Anneloes L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel with Laboratory-Developed Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Respiratory Pathogens
por: Nijhuis, R. H. T., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia
por: Bryant, Sabrina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
por: lin, jeffrey, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures
por: Tansarli, Giannoula S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of the Novel CE-IVD-Marked Multiplex PCR QIAstat-Dx Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel
por: Humisto, Anu, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

To PLEX or Not to PLEX for Amiodarone-Induced Thyrotoxicosis
por: Ahuja, Tania, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

An in‐house 45‐plex array for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in Gram‐positive bacteria
por: Kowalewicz, Carole, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

THE OCCURRENCE OF POLYGLYCEROPHOSPHATE AS AN ANTIGENIC COMPONENT OF VARIOUS GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIAL SPECIES
por: McCarty, Maclyn
Publicado: (1959)

Performance of the QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel for Diagnosing Infectious Gastroenteritis
por: Boers, Stefan A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A 124-plex Microhaplotype Panel Based on Next-generation Sequencing Developed for Forensic Applications
por: Pang, Jing-Bo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Internal validation of an improved system for forensic application: a 41-plex Y-STR panel
por: Chai, Siyu, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cryptococcal Meningoencephalitis in Phenotypically Normal Patients
por: Cumagun, Pia M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evaluation of the respiratory NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage and Alinity m Resp-4-Plex assays
por: Quinton, Mikayla, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Powering up the mu-PLEX chip
por: Tuuva, T, et al.
Publicado: (1986)

High-plex immunofluorescence imaging and traditional histology of the same tissue section for discovering image-based biomarkers
por: Lin, Jia-Ren, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Era of Multigene Panels Comes? The Clinical Utility of Oncotype DX and MammaPrint
por: Xin, Ling, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Performance evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel
por: Lebourgeois, Samuel, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Development of a fingerprinting panel using medically relevant polymorphisms
por: Cross, Deanna S, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Multicenter Evaluation of QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel V2 for Detection of Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
por: Boers, Stefan A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of 4-plex to 8-plex iTRAQ Quantitative Measurements of Proteins in Human Plasma Samples
por: Pottiez, Gwenael, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

BioPlexR and BioPlexPy: integrated data products for the analysis of human protein interactions
por: Geistlinger, Ludwig, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ijsl2n3gjih9gaamrtarj2vne2