Cargando…
Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
INTRODUCTION: Few of us are skilled lipreaders while most struggle with the task. Neural substrates that enable comprehension of connected natural speech via lipreading are not yet well understood. METHODS: We used a data‐driven approach to identify brain areas underlying the lipreading of an 8‐min...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2869 |
_version_ | 1784888531509837824 |
---|---|
author | Saalasti, Satu Alho, Jussi Lahnakoski, Juha M. Bacha‐Trams, Mareike Glerean, Enrico Jääskeläinen, Iiro P. Hasson, Uri Sams, Mikko |
author_facet | Saalasti, Satu Alho, Jussi Lahnakoski, Juha M. Bacha‐Trams, Mareike Glerean, Enrico Jääskeläinen, Iiro P. Hasson, Uri Sams, Mikko |
author_sort | Saalasti, Satu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Few of us are skilled lipreaders while most struggle with the task. Neural substrates that enable comprehension of connected natural speech via lipreading are not yet well understood. METHODS: We used a data‐driven approach to identify brain areas underlying the lipreading of an 8‐min narrative with participants whose lipreading skills varied extensively (range 6–100%, mean = 50.7%). The participants also listened to and read the same narrative. The similarity between individual participants’ brain activity during the whole narrative, within and between conditions, was estimated by a voxel‐wise comparison of the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal time courses. RESULTS: Inter‐subject correlation (ISC) of the time courses revealed that lipreading, listening to, and reading the narrative were largely supported by the same brain areas in the temporal, parietal and frontal cortices, precuneus, and cerebellum. Additionally, listening to and reading connected naturalistic speech particularly activated higher‐level linguistic processing in the parietal and frontal cortices more consistently than lipreading, probably paralleling the limited understanding obtained via lip‐reading. Importantly, higher lipreading test score and subjective estimate of comprehension of the lipread narrative was associated with activity in the superior and middle temporal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Our new data illustrates that findings from prior studies using well‐controlled repetitive speech stimuli and stimulus‐driven data analyses are also valid for naturalistic connected speech. Our results might suggest an efficient use of brain areas dealing with phonological processing in skilled lipreaders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9927859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99278592023-02-16 Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading Saalasti, Satu Alho, Jussi Lahnakoski, Juha M. Bacha‐Trams, Mareike Glerean, Enrico Jääskeläinen, Iiro P. Hasson, Uri Sams, Mikko Brain Behav Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Few of us are skilled lipreaders while most struggle with the task. Neural substrates that enable comprehension of connected natural speech via lipreading are not yet well understood. METHODS: We used a data‐driven approach to identify brain areas underlying the lipreading of an 8‐min narrative with participants whose lipreading skills varied extensively (range 6–100%, mean = 50.7%). The participants also listened to and read the same narrative. The similarity between individual participants’ brain activity during the whole narrative, within and between conditions, was estimated by a voxel‐wise comparison of the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal time courses. RESULTS: Inter‐subject correlation (ISC) of the time courses revealed that lipreading, listening to, and reading the narrative were largely supported by the same brain areas in the temporal, parietal and frontal cortices, precuneus, and cerebellum. Additionally, listening to and reading connected naturalistic speech particularly activated higher‐level linguistic processing in the parietal and frontal cortices more consistently than lipreading, probably paralleling the limited understanding obtained via lip‐reading. Importantly, higher lipreading test score and subjective estimate of comprehension of the lipread narrative was associated with activity in the superior and middle temporal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Our new data illustrates that findings from prior studies using well‐controlled repetitive speech stimuli and stimulus‐driven data analyses are also valid for naturalistic connected speech. Our results might suggest an efficient use of brain areas dealing with phonological processing in skilled lipreaders. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9927859/ /pubmed/36579557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2869 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Saalasti, Satu Alho, Jussi Lahnakoski, Juha M. Bacha‐Trams, Mareike Glerean, Enrico Jääskeläinen, Iiro P. Hasson, Uri Sams, Mikko Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading |
title | Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading |
title_full | Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading |
title_fullStr | Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading |
title_full_unstemmed | Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading |
title_short | Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading |
title_sort | lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: neural characteristics shared with listening and reading |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saalastisatu lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading AT alhojussi lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading AT lahnakoskijuham lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading AT bachatramsmareike lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading AT glereanenrico lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading AT jaaskelaineniirop lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading AT hassonuri lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading AT samsmikko lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading |