Cargando…

Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading

INTRODUCTION: Few of us are skilled lipreaders while most struggle with the task. Neural substrates that enable comprehension of connected natural speech via lipreading are not yet well understood. METHODS: We used a data‐driven approach to identify brain areas underlying the lipreading of an 8‐min...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saalasti, Satu, Alho, Jussi, Lahnakoski, Juha M., Bacha‐Trams, Mareike, Glerean, Enrico, Jääskeläinen, Iiro P., Hasson, Uri, Sams, Mikko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2869
_version_ 1784888531509837824
author Saalasti, Satu
Alho, Jussi
Lahnakoski, Juha M.
Bacha‐Trams, Mareike
Glerean, Enrico
Jääskeläinen, Iiro P.
Hasson, Uri
Sams, Mikko
author_facet Saalasti, Satu
Alho, Jussi
Lahnakoski, Juha M.
Bacha‐Trams, Mareike
Glerean, Enrico
Jääskeläinen, Iiro P.
Hasson, Uri
Sams, Mikko
author_sort Saalasti, Satu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Few of us are skilled lipreaders while most struggle with the task. Neural substrates that enable comprehension of connected natural speech via lipreading are not yet well understood. METHODS: We used a data‐driven approach to identify brain areas underlying the lipreading of an 8‐min narrative with participants whose lipreading skills varied extensively (range 6–100%, mean = 50.7%). The participants also listened to and read the same narrative. The similarity between individual participants’ brain activity during the whole narrative, within and between conditions, was estimated by a voxel‐wise comparison of the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal time courses. RESULTS: Inter‐subject correlation (ISC) of the time courses revealed that lipreading, listening to, and reading the narrative were largely supported by the same brain areas in the temporal, parietal and frontal cortices, precuneus, and cerebellum. Additionally, listening to and reading connected naturalistic speech particularly activated higher‐level linguistic processing in the parietal and frontal cortices more consistently than lipreading, probably paralleling the limited understanding obtained via lip‐reading. Importantly, higher lipreading test score and subjective estimate of comprehension of the lipread narrative was associated with activity in the superior and middle temporal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Our new data illustrates that findings from prior studies using well‐controlled repetitive speech stimuli and stimulus‐driven data analyses are also valid for naturalistic connected speech. Our results might suggest an efficient use of brain areas dealing with phonological processing in skilled lipreaders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9927859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99278592023-02-16 Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading Saalasti, Satu Alho, Jussi Lahnakoski, Juha M. Bacha‐Trams, Mareike Glerean, Enrico Jääskeläinen, Iiro P. Hasson, Uri Sams, Mikko Brain Behav Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Few of us are skilled lipreaders while most struggle with the task. Neural substrates that enable comprehension of connected natural speech via lipreading are not yet well understood. METHODS: We used a data‐driven approach to identify brain areas underlying the lipreading of an 8‐min narrative with participants whose lipreading skills varied extensively (range 6–100%, mean = 50.7%). The participants also listened to and read the same narrative. The similarity between individual participants’ brain activity during the whole narrative, within and between conditions, was estimated by a voxel‐wise comparison of the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal time courses. RESULTS: Inter‐subject correlation (ISC) of the time courses revealed that lipreading, listening to, and reading the narrative were largely supported by the same brain areas in the temporal, parietal and frontal cortices, precuneus, and cerebellum. Additionally, listening to and reading connected naturalistic speech particularly activated higher‐level linguistic processing in the parietal and frontal cortices more consistently than lipreading, probably paralleling the limited understanding obtained via lip‐reading. Importantly, higher lipreading test score and subjective estimate of comprehension of the lipread narrative was associated with activity in the superior and middle temporal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Our new data illustrates that findings from prior studies using well‐controlled repetitive speech stimuli and stimulus‐driven data analyses are also valid for naturalistic connected speech. Our results might suggest an efficient use of brain areas dealing with phonological processing in skilled lipreaders. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9927859/ /pubmed/36579557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2869 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Saalasti, Satu
Alho, Jussi
Lahnakoski, Juha M.
Bacha‐Trams, Mareike
Glerean, Enrico
Jääskeläinen, Iiro P.
Hasson, Uri
Sams, Mikko
Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
title Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
title_full Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
title_fullStr Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
title_full_unstemmed Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
title_short Lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: Neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
title_sort lipreading a naturalistic narrative in a female population: neural characteristics shared with listening and reading
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2869
work_keys_str_mv AT saalastisatu lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading
AT alhojussi lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading
AT lahnakoskijuham lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading
AT bachatramsmareike lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading
AT glereanenrico lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading
AT jaaskelaineniirop lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading
AT hassonuri lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading
AT samsmikko lipreadinganaturalisticnarrativeinafemalepopulationneuralcharacteristicssharedwithlisteningandreading