Cargando…

Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta‐analysis

We performed a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery. A systematic literature search up to June 2022 was performed and 6026 subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery at the baseline of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Leiming, Zhou, Sufang, Liao, Jiajia, Zhou, Xiangyu, Wang, Jincheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13928
_version_ 1784888542987550720
author Mao, Leiming
Zhou, Sufang
Liao, Jiajia
Zhou, Xiangyu
Wang, Jincheng
author_facet Mao, Leiming
Zhou, Sufang
Liao, Jiajia
Zhou, Xiangyu
Wang, Jincheng
author_sort Mao, Leiming
collection PubMed
description We performed a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery. A systematic literature search up to June 2022 was performed and 6026 subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery at the baseline of the studies; 3090 of them were using the wound protector, and 2936 were using no wound protector. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery using the dichotomous methods with a random or fixed‐effect model. The surgical site wound infection was significantly lower with single‐ring wound protectors (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39‐0.83, P = .004), and dual‐ring wound protectors (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35‐0.56, P < .001) in subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery compared with no wound protector. The surgical site wound infection was significantly lower with single‐ring wound protectors, and dual‐ring wound protectors in subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery compared with no wound protector. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 5 out of 28 studies in the meta‐analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9927917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99279172023-02-16 Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta‐analysis Mao, Leiming Zhou, Sufang Liao, Jiajia Zhou, Xiangyu Wang, Jincheng Int Wound J Original Articles We performed a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery. A systematic literature search up to June 2022 was performed and 6026 subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery at the baseline of the studies; 3090 of them were using the wound protector, and 2936 were using no wound protector. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery using the dichotomous methods with a random or fixed‐effect model. The surgical site wound infection was significantly lower with single‐ring wound protectors (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39‐0.83, P = .004), and dual‐ring wound protectors (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35‐0.56, P < .001) in subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery compared with no wound protector. The surgical site wound infection was significantly lower with single‐ring wound protectors, and dual‐ring wound protectors in subjects with lower gastrointestinal surgery compared with no wound protector. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 5 out of 28 studies in the meta‐analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9927917/ /pubmed/36117245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13928 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mao, Leiming
Zhou, Sufang
Liao, Jiajia
Zhou, Xiangyu
Wang, Jincheng
Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta‐analysis
title Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_full Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_short Effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: A meta‐analysis
title_sort effect of wound protectors in reducing the incidence of surgical site wound infection in lower gastrointestinal surgery: a meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13928
work_keys_str_mv AT maoleiming effectofwoundprotectorsinreducingtheincidenceofsurgicalsitewoundinfectioninlowergastrointestinalsurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhousufang effectofwoundprotectorsinreducingtheincidenceofsurgicalsitewoundinfectioninlowergastrointestinalsurgeryametaanalysis
AT liaojiajia effectofwoundprotectorsinreducingtheincidenceofsurgicalsitewoundinfectioninlowergastrointestinalsurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhouxiangyu effectofwoundprotectorsinreducingtheincidenceofsurgicalsitewoundinfectioninlowergastrointestinalsurgeryametaanalysis
AT wangjincheng effectofwoundprotectorsinreducingtheincidenceofsurgicalsitewoundinfectioninlowergastrointestinalsurgeryametaanalysis