Cargando…

A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic

Importance  A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. Objective  The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sally S.E., Vij, Rohin, Wu, Jeff, Zarrin, Bryan, Moon, Jee-Young, Oliveira, Jason, Schultz, Jeffrey S., Shrivastava, Anurag
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741464
_version_ 1784888557912981504
author Park, Sally S.E.
Vij, Rohin
Wu, Jeff
Zarrin, Bryan
Moon, Jee-Young
Oliveira, Jason
Schultz, Jeffrey S.
Shrivastava, Anurag
author_facet Park, Sally S.E.
Vij, Rohin
Wu, Jeff
Zarrin, Bryan
Moon, Jee-Young
Oliveira, Jason
Schultz, Jeffrey S.
Shrivastava, Anurag
author_sort Park, Sally S.E.
collection PubMed
description Importance  A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. Objective  The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new patient encounters based on their site of initial presentation. Design, Setting, and Participants  A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive urgent new patient evaluations in our same-day triage clinic at the Henkind Eye Institute at Montefiore Medical Center between February 2019 and January 2020. The cohort of patients who presented directly to this urgent care clinic were referred to as the “TRIAGE” group. Patients who initially presented to an emergency department (ED), and were subsequently referred to our triage clinic, are referred to as the “ED + TRIAGE” group. Main Outcomes and Measures  Visits were evaluated on a variety of metrics, including diagnosis, duration, charge, cost, and revenue. Furthermore, return to the ED or inpatient admission was documented. Results  Of 3,482 visits analyzed, 2,538 (72.9%) were in the “TRIAGE” group. Common presenting diagnoses were ocular surface disease ( n  = 486, 19.1%), trauma ( n  = 342, 13.5%; most commonly surface abrasion n  = 195, 7.7%), and infectious conjunctivitis ( n  = 304, 12.0%). Patients in the “TRIAGE” group, on average, were seen 184.6% faster (158.2 vs. 450.2 minutes) than patients in the “ED + TRIAGE” group ( p  < 0.001). The “ED + TRIAGE” group were furthermore found to generate 442.1% higher charges ($870.20 vs. 4717.70) and were associated with 175.1% higher cost ($908.80 vs. 330.40) per patient. The hospital was found to save money when noncommercially insured patients with ophthalmic complaints presented to the triage clinic instead of the ED. Patients seen in the triage clinic had a low rate of readmission to the ED ( n  = 42, 1.2%). Conclusions and Relevance  A same-day ophthalmology triage clinic provides efficient care, while providing a rich learning environment for residents. Less wait time with direct access to subspecialist care can help improve quality, outcome, and satisfaction metrics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9927978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99279782023-06-29 A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic Park, Sally S.E. Vij, Rohin Wu, Jeff Zarrin, Bryan Moon, Jee-Young Oliveira, Jason Schultz, Jeffrey S. Shrivastava, Anurag J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Importance  A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. Objective  The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new patient encounters based on their site of initial presentation. Design, Setting, and Participants  A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive urgent new patient evaluations in our same-day triage clinic at the Henkind Eye Institute at Montefiore Medical Center between February 2019 and January 2020. The cohort of patients who presented directly to this urgent care clinic were referred to as the “TRIAGE” group. Patients who initially presented to an emergency department (ED), and were subsequently referred to our triage clinic, are referred to as the “ED + TRIAGE” group. Main Outcomes and Measures  Visits were evaluated on a variety of metrics, including diagnosis, duration, charge, cost, and revenue. Furthermore, return to the ED or inpatient admission was documented. Results  Of 3,482 visits analyzed, 2,538 (72.9%) were in the “TRIAGE” group. Common presenting diagnoses were ocular surface disease ( n  = 486, 19.1%), trauma ( n  = 342, 13.5%; most commonly surface abrasion n  = 195, 7.7%), and infectious conjunctivitis ( n  = 304, 12.0%). Patients in the “TRIAGE” group, on average, were seen 184.6% faster (158.2 vs. 450.2 minutes) than patients in the “ED + TRIAGE” group ( p  < 0.001). The “ED + TRIAGE” group were furthermore found to generate 442.1% higher charges ($870.20 vs. 4717.70) and were associated with 175.1% higher cost ($908.80 vs. 330.40) per patient. The hospital was found to save money when noncommercially insured patients with ophthalmic complaints presented to the triage clinic instead of the ED. Patients seen in the triage clinic had a low rate of readmission to the ED ( n  = 42, 1.2%). Conclusions and Relevance  A same-day ophthalmology triage clinic provides efficient care, while providing a rich learning environment for residents. Less wait time with direct access to subspecialist care can help improve quality, outcome, and satisfaction metrics. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9927978/ /pubmed/37388170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741464 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Park, Sally S.E.
Vij, Rohin
Wu, Jeff
Zarrin, Bryan
Moon, Jee-Young
Oliveira, Jason
Schultz, Jeffrey S.
Shrivastava, Anurag
A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic
title A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic
title_full A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic
title_fullStr A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic
title_short A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic
title_sort systematic analysis of the impact of an ambulatory ophthalmology urgent care clinic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741464
work_keys_str_mv AT parksallyse asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT vijrohin asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT wujeff asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT zarrinbryan asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT moonjeeyoung asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT oliveirajason asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT schultzjeffreys asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT shrivastavaanurag asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT parksallyse systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT vijrohin systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT wujeff systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT zarrinbryan systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT moonjeeyoung systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT oliveirajason systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT schultzjeffreys systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic
AT shrivastavaanurag systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic