Cargando…
A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic
Importance A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. Objective The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741464 |
_version_ | 1784888557912981504 |
---|---|
author | Park, Sally S.E. Vij, Rohin Wu, Jeff Zarrin, Bryan Moon, Jee-Young Oliveira, Jason Schultz, Jeffrey S. Shrivastava, Anurag |
author_facet | Park, Sally S.E. Vij, Rohin Wu, Jeff Zarrin, Bryan Moon, Jee-Young Oliveira, Jason Schultz, Jeffrey S. Shrivastava, Anurag |
author_sort | Park, Sally S.E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Importance A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. Objective The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new patient encounters based on their site of initial presentation. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive urgent new patient evaluations in our same-day triage clinic at the Henkind Eye Institute at Montefiore Medical Center between February 2019 and January 2020. The cohort of patients who presented directly to this urgent care clinic were referred to as the “TRIAGE” group. Patients who initially presented to an emergency department (ED), and were subsequently referred to our triage clinic, are referred to as the “ED + TRIAGE” group. Main Outcomes and Measures Visits were evaluated on a variety of metrics, including diagnosis, duration, charge, cost, and revenue. Furthermore, return to the ED or inpatient admission was documented. Results Of 3,482 visits analyzed, 2,538 (72.9%) were in the “TRIAGE” group. Common presenting diagnoses were ocular surface disease ( n = 486, 19.1%), trauma ( n = 342, 13.5%; most commonly surface abrasion n = 195, 7.7%), and infectious conjunctivitis ( n = 304, 12.0%). Patients in the “TRIAGE” group, on average, were seen 184.6% faster (158.2 vs. 450.2 minutes) than patients in the “ED + TRIAGE” group ( p < 0.001). The “ED + TRIAGE” group were furthermore found to generate 442.1% higher charges ($870.20 vs. 4717.70) and were associated with 175.1% higher cost ($908.80 vs. 330.40) per patient. The hospital was found to save money when noncommercially insured patients with ophthalmic complaints presented to the triage clinic instead of the ED. Patients seen in the triage clinic had a low rate of readmission to the ED ( n = 42, 1.2%). Conclusions and Relevance A same-day ophthalmology triage clinic provides efficient care, while providing a rich learning environment for residents. Less wait time with direct access to subspecialist care can help improve quality, outcome, and satisfaction metrics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9927978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99279782023-06-29 A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic Park, Sally S.E. Vij, Rohin Wu, Jeff Zarrin, Bryan Moon, Jee-Young Oliveira, Jason Schultz, Jeffrey S. Shrivastava, Anurag J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Importance A same-day ophthalmic urgent care clinic can provide efficient eye care, a rich educational environment, and can improve patient experience. Objective The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate volume, financial impact, care metrics, and the breadth of pathology of urgent new patient encounters based on their site of initial presentation. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive urgent new patient evaluations in our same-day triage clinic at the Henkind Eye Institute at Montefiore Medical Center between February 2019 and January 2020. The cohort of patients who presented directly to this urgent care clinic were referred to as the “TRIAGE” group. Patients who initially presented to an emergency department (ED), and were subsequently referred to our triage clinic, are referred to as the “ED + TRIAGE” group. Main Outcomes and Measures Visits were evaluated on a variety of metrics, including diagnosis, duration, charge, cost, and revenue. Furthermore, return to the ED or inpatient admission was documented. Results Of 3,482 visits analyzed, 2,538 (72.9%) were in the “TRIAGE” group. Common presenting diagnoses were ocular surface disease ( n = 486, 19.1%), trauma ( n = 342, 13.5%; most commonly surface abrasion n = 195, 7.7%), and infectious conjunctivitis ( n = 304, 12.0%). Patients in the “TRIAGE” group, on average, were seen 184.6% faster (158.2 vs. 450.2 minutes) than patients in the “ED + TRIAGE” group ( p < 0.001). The “ED + TRIAGE” group were furthermore found to generate 442.1% higher charges ($870.20 vs. 4717.70) and were associated with 175.1% higher cost ($908.80 vs. 330.40) per patient. The hospital was found to save money when noncommercially insured patients with ophthalmic complaints presented to the triage clinic instead of the ED. Patients seen in the triage clinic had a low rate of readmission to the ED ( n = 42, 1.2%). Conclusions and Relevance A same-day ophthalmology triage clinic provides efficient care, while providing a rich learning environment for residents. Less wait time with direct access to subspecialist care can help improve quality, outcome, and satisfaction metrics. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9927978/ /pubmed/37388170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741464 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Park, Sally S.E. Vij, Rohin Wu, Jeff Zarrin, Bryan Moon, Jee-Young Oliveira, Jason Schultz, Jeffrey S. Shrivastava, Anurag A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic |
title | A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic |
title_full | A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic |
title_short | A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of an Ambulatory Ophthalmology Urgent Care Clinic |
title_sort | systematic analysis of the impact of an ambulatory ophthalmology urgent care clinic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parksallyse asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT vijrohin asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT wujeff asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT zarrinbryan asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT moonjeeyoung asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT oliveirajason asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT schultzjeffreys asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT shrivastavaanurag asystematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT parksallyse systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT vijrohin systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT wujeff systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT zarrinbryan systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT moonjeeyoung systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT oliveirajason systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT schultzjeffreys systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic AT shrivastavaanurag systematicanalysisoftheimpactofanambulatoryophthalmologyurgentcareclinic |