Cargando…
Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores
Purpose Prior studies have revealed grading discrepancies in evaluation of personal statements and letters of recommendation based on candidate's race and gender. Fatigue and the end-of-day phenomenon can negatively impact task performance but have not been studied in the residency selection p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744272 |
_version_ | 1784888559570780160 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Chih-Chiun J. Moussa, Omar Chen, Royce W. S. Glass, Lora R. Dagi Cioffi, George A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Winn, Bryan J. |
author_facet | Chang, Chih-Chiun J. Moussa, Omar Chen, Royce W. S. Glass, Lora R. Dagi Cioffi, George A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Winn, Bryan J. |
author_sort | Chang, Chih-Chiun J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose Prior studies have revealed grading discrepancies in evaluation of personal statements and letters of recommendation based on candidate's race and gender. Fatigue and the end-of-day phenomenon can negatively impact task performance but have not been studied in the residency selection process. Our primary objective is to determine whether factors related to interview time and day as well as candidate's and interviewer's gender have a significant effect on residency interview scores. Methods Seven years of ophthalmology residency candidate evaluation scores from 2013 to 2019 were collected at a single academic institution, standardized by interviewer into relative percentiles (0–100 point grading scale), and grouped into the following categories for comparisons: different interview days (Day 1 vs. Day 2), morning versus afternoon (AM vs. PM), interview session (Day 1 AM/PM vs. Day 2 AM/PM), before and after breaks (morning break, lunch break, and afternoon break), residency candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender. Results Candidates in the morning sessions were found to have higher scores than afternoon sessions (52.75 vs. 49.28, p < 0.001). Interview scores in the early morning, late morning, and early afternoon were higher than late afternoon scores (54.47, 53.01, 52.15 vs. 46.74, p < 0.001). Across all interview years, there were no differences in scores received before and after morning breaks (51.71 vs. 52.83, p = 0.49), lunch breaks (53.01 vs. 52.15, p = 0.58), and afternoon breaks (50.35 vs. 48.30, p = 0.21). No differences were found in scores received by female versus male candidates (51.55 vs. 50.49, p = 0.21) or scores given by female versus male interviewers (51.31 vs. 50.84, p = 0.58). Conclusion Afternoon residency candidate interview scores, especially late afternoon, were significantly lower than morning scores, suggesting the need to further study the effects of interviewer's fatigue in the residency interview process. The interview day, presence of break times, candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender had no significant effects on interview score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9927985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99279852023-06-29 Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores Chang, Chih-Chiun J. Moussa, Omar Chen, Royce W. S. Glass, Lora R. Dagi Cioffi, George A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Winn, Bryan J. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Purpose Prior studies have revealed grading discrepancies in evaluation of personal statements and letters of recommendation based on candidate's race and gender. Fatigue and the end-of-day phenomenon can negatively impact task performance but have not been studied in the residency selection process. Our primary objective is to determine whether factors related to interview time and day as well as candidate's and interviewer's gender have a significant effect on residency interview scores. Methods Seven years of ophthalmology residency candidate evaluation scores from 2013 to 2019 were collected at a single academic institution, standardized by interviewer into relative percentiles (0–100 point grading scale), and grouped into the following categories for comparisons: different interview days (Day 1 vs. Day 2), morning versus afternoon (AM vs. PM), interview session (Day 1 AM/PM vs. Day 2 AM/PM), before and after breaks (morning break, lunch break, and afternoon break), residency candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender. Results Candidates in the morning sessions were found to have higher scores than afternoon sessions (52.75 vs. 49.28, p < 0.001). Interview scores in the early morning, late morning, and early afternoon were higher than late afternoon scores (54.47, 53.01, 52.15 vs. 46.74, p < 0.001). Across all interview years, there were no differences in scores received before and after morning breaks (51.71 vs. 52.83, p = 0.49), lunch breaks (53.01 vs. 52.15, p = 0.58), and afternoon breaks (50.35 vs. 48.30, p = 0.21). No differences were found in scores received by female versus male candidates (51.55 vs. 50.49, p = 0.21) or scores given by female versus male interviewers (51.31 vs. 50.84, p = 0.58). Conclusion Afternoon residency candidate interview scores, especially late afternoon, were significantly lower than morning scores, suggesting the need to further study the effects of interviewer's fatigue in the residency interview process. The interview day, presence of break times, candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender had no significant effects on interview score. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9927985/ /pubmed/37388175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744272 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Chang, Chih-Chiun J. Moussa, Omar Chen, Royce W. S. Glass, Lora R. Dagi Cioffi, George A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Winn, Bryan J. Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores |
title | Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores |
title_full | Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores |
title_fullStr | Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores |
title_short | Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores |
title_sort | exploring potential schedule-related and gender biases in ophthalmology residency interview scores |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changchihchiunj exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores AT moussaomar exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores AT chenroycews exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores AT glasslorardagi exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores AT cioffigeorgea exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores AT liebmannjeffreym exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores AT winnbryanj exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores |