Cargando…

Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores

Purpose  Prior studies have revealed grading discrepancies in evaluation of personal statements and letters of recommendation based on candidate's race and gender. Fatigue and the end-of-day phenomenon can negatively impact task performance but have not been studied in the residency selection p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Chih-Chiun J., Moussa, Omar, Chen, Royce W. S., Glass, Lora R. Dagi, Cioffi, George A., Liebmann, Jeffrey M., Winn, Bryan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744272
_version_ 1784888559570780160
author Chang, Chih-Chiun J.
Moussa, Omar
Chen, Royce W. S.
Glass, Lora R. Dagi
Cioffi, George A.
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Winn, Bryan J.
author_facet Chang, Chih-Chiun J.
Moussa, Omar
Chen, Royce W. S.
Glass, Lora R. Dagi
Cioffi, George A.
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Winn, Bryan J.
author_sort Chang, Chih-Chiun J.
collection PubMed
description Purpose  Prior studies have revealed grading discrepancies in evaluation of personal statements and letters of recommendation based on candidate's race and gender. Fatigue and the end-of-day phenomenon can negatively impact task performance but have not been studied in the residency selection process. Our primary objective is to determine whether factors related to interview time and day as well as candidate's and interviewer's gender have a significant effect on residency interview scores. Methods  Seven years of ophthalmology residency candidate evaluation scores from 2013 to 2019 were collected at a single academic institution, standardized by interviewer into relative percentiles (0–100 point grading scale), and grouped into the following categories for comparisons: different interview days (Day 1 vs. Day 2), morning versus afternoon (AM vs. PM), interview session (Day 1 AM/PM vs. Day 2 AM/PM), before and after breaks (morning break, lunch break, and afternoon break), residency candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender. Results  Candidates in the morning sessions were found to have higher scores than afternoon sessions (52.75 vs. 49.28, p  < 0.001). Interview scores in the early morning, late morning, and early afternoon were higher than late afternoon scores (54.47, 53.01, 52.15 vs. 46.74, p  < 0.001). Across all interview years, there were no differences in scores received before and after morning breaks (51.71 vs. 52.83, p  = 0.49), lunch breaks (53.01 vs. 52.15, p  = 0.58), and afternoon breaks (50.35 vs. 48.30, p  = 0.21). No differences were found in scores received by female versus male candidates (51.55 vs. 50.49, p  = 0.21) or scores given by female versus male interviewers (51.31 vs. 50.84, p  = 0.58). Conclusion  Afternoon residency candidate interview scores, especially late afternoon, were significantly lower than morning scores, suggesting the need to further study the effects of interviewer's fatigue in the residency interview process. The interview day, presence of break times, candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender had no significant effects on interview score.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9927985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99279852023-06-29 Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores Chang, Chih-Chiun J. Moussa, Omar Chen, Royce W. S. Glass, Lora R. Dagi Cioffi, George A. Liebmann, Jeffrey M. Winn, Bryan J. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Purpose  Prior studies have revealed grading discrepancies in evaluation of personal statements and letters of recommendation based on candidate's race and gender. Fatigue and the end-of-day phenomenon can negatively impact task performance but have not been studied in the residency selection process. Our primary objective is to determine whether factors related to interview time and day as well as candidate's and interviewer's gender have a significant effect on residency interview scores. Methods  Seven years of ophthalmology residency candidate evaluation scores from 2013 to 2019 were collected at a single academic institution, standardized by interviewer into relative percentiles (0–100 point grading scale), and grouped into the following categories for comparisons: different interview days (Day 1 vs. Day 2), morning versus afternoon (AM vs. PM), interview session (Day 1 AM/PM vs. Day 2 AM/PM), before and after breaks (morning break, lunch break, and afternoon break), residency candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender. Results  Candidates in the morning sessions were found to have higher scores than afternoon sessions (52.75 vs. 49.28, p  < 0.001). Interview scores in the early morning, late morning, and early afternoon were higher than late afternoon scores (54.47, 53.01, 52.15 vs. 46.74, p  < 0.001). Across all interview years, there were no differences in scores received before and after morning breaks (51.71 vs. 52.83, p  = 0.49), lunch breaks (53.01 vs. 52.15, p  = 0.58), and afternoon breaks (50.35 vs. 48.30, p  = 0.21). No differences were found in scores received by female versus male candidates (51.55 vs. 50.49, p  = 0.21) or scores given by female versus male interviewers (51.31 vs. 50.84, p  = 0.58). Conclusion  Afternoon residency candidate interview scores, especially late afternoon, were significantly lower than morning scores, suggesting the need to further study the effects of interviewer's fatigue in the residency interview process. The interview day, presence of break times, candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender had no significant effects on interview score. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9927985/ /pubmed/37388175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744272 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Chang, Chih-Chiun J.
Moussa, Omar
Chen, Royce W. S.
Glass, Lora R. Dagi
Cioffi, George A.
Liebmann, Jeffrey M.
Winn, Bryan J.
Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores
title Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores
title_full Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores
title_fullStr Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores
title_short Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores
title_sort exploring potential schedule-related and gender biases in ophthalmology residency interview scores
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744272
work_keys_str_mv AT changchihchiunj exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores
AT moussaomar exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores
AT chenroycews exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores
AT glasslorardagi exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores
AT cioffigeorgea exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores
AT liebmannjeffreym exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores
AT winnbryanj exploringpotentialschedulerelatedandgenderbiasesinophthalmologyresidencyinterviewscores