Cargando…

Evaluating the Efficacy of Microsurgical Training Methods in Ophthalmology Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective  The objective of our paper is to review all of the relevant literature in ophthalmology microsurgical education and identify which teaching methodologies were most effective. Methods  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted. Electronic databases, including Ov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Geoffrey, Palmer, Jamie, Ludeman, Emilie, Levin, Moran R., Swamy, Ramya, Alexander, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740066
_version_ 1784888561693097984
author Nguyen, Geoffrey
Palmer, Jamie
Ludeman, Emilie
Levin, Moran R.
Swamy, Ramya
Alexander, Janet
author_facet Nguyen, Geoffrey
Palmer, Jamie
Ludeman, Emilie
Levin, Moran R.
Swamy, Ramya
Alexander, Janet
author_sort Nguyen, Geoffrey
collection PubMed
description Objective  The objective of our paper is to review all of the relevant literature in ophthalmology microsurgical education and identify which teaching methodologies were most effective. Methods  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted. Electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE, were searched with preset terms. The search was through December 11, 2019. Eligibility criteria included studies with sufficient data for analyzing associations between surgical teaching techniques and success rates in surgical skills and the organization of the intervention as a microsurgical skills course, curriculum, or program. The articles were independently reviewed by two authors. Each included study was evaluated for quality using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing bias. Data Extraction and Synthesis  Data extraction was performed by two reviewers and disagreements were checked by a third reviewer. A random-effects analysis was used to pool the outcomes of studies. Main Outcomes and Measures  Outcomes included time for completion of surgical task, level of preparedness, competency score, and number of surgeries with complications. Results  A total of 439 studies were reviewed and 13 studies ( n  = 8,790 surgical cases; n  = 115 trainees) were included in the meta-analysis. Excluded articles studied cataract simulation training as the primary intervention or were not related to ophthalmology. All pooled results demonstrated a positive association with surgical outcomes; however, video-based education (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 2.49 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–4.63]; four effects [four studies]; n  = 69; I (2)  = 90%) and stepwise teaching method (odds ratio [OR = 3.84 [95% CI: 2.66–5.55]; six effects [six studies]; n  = 6,968; I (2)  = 39%) interventions were the most favorable. Conclusion and Relevance  The following five interventions evaluated in this paper were found to be effective methods of improving performance outcomes in ophthalmic microsurgery: (1) didactic lectures, (2) video-based education, (3) surgical wet-laboratory, (4) stepwise method, and (5) direct supervision and feedback. Our meta-analysis concludes that video-based education and stepwise teaching interventions are the most effective methods for a microsurgical ophthalmology training curriculum. Combining the strengths of the interventions analyzed in this study should be considered when implementing and adjusting ophthalmic surgical skills curriculums.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9927993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99279932023-06-29 Evaluating the Efficacy of Microsurgical Training Methods in Ophthalmology Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Nguyen, Geoffrey Palmer, Jamie Ludeman, Emilie Levin, Moran R. Swamy, Ramya Alexander, Janet J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Objective  The objective of our paper is to review all of the relevant literature in ophthalmology microsurgical education and identify which teaching methodologies were most effective. Methods  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted. Electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE, were searched with preset terms. The search was through December 11, 2019. Eligibility criteria included studies with sufficient data for analyzing associations between surgical teaching techniques and success rates in surgical skills and the organization of the intervention as a microsurgical skills course, curriculum, or program. The articles were independently reviewed by two authors. Each included study was evaluated for quality using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing bias. Data Extraction and Synthesis  Data extraction was performed by two reviewers and disagreements were checked by a third reviewer. A random-effects analysis was used to pool the outcomes of studies. Main Outcomes and Measures  Outcomes included time for completion of surgical task, level of preparedness, competency score, and number of surgeries with complications. Results  A total of 439 studies were reviewed and 13 studies ( n  = 8,790 surgical cases; n  = 115 trainees) were included in the meta-analysis. Excluded articles studied cataract simulation training as the primary intervention or were not related to ophthalmology. All pooled results demonstrated a positive association with surgical outcomes; however, video-based education (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 2.49 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–4.63]; four effects [four studies]; n  = 69; I (2)  = 90%) and stepwise teaching method (odds ratio [OR = 3.84 [95% CI: 2.66–5.55]; six effects [six studies]; n  = 6,968; I (2)  = 39%) interventions were the most favorable. Conclusion and Relevance  The following five interventions evaluated in this paper were found to be effective methods of improving performance outcomes in ophthalmic microsurgery: (1) didactic lectures, (2) video-based education, (3) surgical wet-laboratory, (4) stepwise method, and (5) direct supervision and feedback. Our meta-analysis concludes that video-based education and stepwise teaching interventions are the most effective methods for a microsurgical ophthalmology training curriculum. Combining the strengths of the interventions analyzed in this study should be considered when implementing and adjusting ophthalmic surgical skills curriculums. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9927993/ /pubmed/37388848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740066 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nguyen, Geoffrey
Palmer, Jamie
Ludeman, Emilie
Levin, Moran R.
Swamy, Ramya
Alexander, Janet
Evaluating the Efficacy of Microsurgical Training Methods in Ophthalmology Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Evaluating the Efficacy of Microsurgical Training Methods in Ophthalmology Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Evaluating the Efficacy of Microsurgical Training Methods in Ophthalmology Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the Efficacy of Microsurgical Training Methods in Ophthalmology Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Efficacy of Microsurgical Training Methods in Ophthalmology Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Evaluating the Efficacy of Microsurgical Training Methods in Ophthalmology Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort evaluating the efficacy of microsurgical training methods in ophthalmology education: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740066
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyengeoffrey evaluatingtheefficacyofmicrosurgicaltrainingmethodsinophthalmologyeducationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT palmerjamie evaluatingtheefficacyofmicrosurgicaltrainingmethodsinophthalmologyeducationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ludemanemilie evaluatingtheefficacyofmicrosurgicaltrainingmethodsinophthalmologyeducationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT levinmoranr evaluatingtheefficacyofmicrosurgicaltrainingmethodsinophthalmologyeducationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT swamyramya evaluatingtheefficacyofmicrosurgicaltrainingmethodsinophthalmologyeducationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alexanderjanet evaluatingtheefficacyofmicrosurgicaltrainingmethodsinophthalmologyeducationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis