Cargando…

In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank

Objective  This article characterizes the resources used by ophthalmology residency applicants when deciding where to apply, interview, and rank. Design  Cross-sectional, online survey. Participants  All applicants to the University of California–San Francisco ophthalmology residency program during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Joy Q., Ahmad, Tessnim R., Parikh, Neeti, Srikumaran, Divya, Woreta, Fasika, Ramanathan, Saras
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756123
_version_ 1784888562922029056
author Jin, Joy Q.
Ahmad, Tessnim R.
Parikh, Neeti
Srikumaran, Divya
Woreta, Fasika
Ramanathan, Saras
author_facet Jin, Joy Q.
Ahmad, Tessnim R.
Parikh, Neeti
Srikumaran, Divya
Woreta, Fasika
Ramanathan, Saras
author_sort Jin, Joy Q.
collection PubMed
description Objective  This article characterizes the resources used by ophthalmology residency applicants when deciding where to apply, interview, and rank. Design  Cross-sectional, online survey. Participants  All applicants to the University of California–San Francisco ophthalmology residency program during the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 application cycles. Methods  A secure, anonymous, 19-item post-match questionnaire was distributed to participants inquiring about demographic information, match outcomes, and resources used to learn and make decisions about residency programs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Main Outcome Measures  Qualitative ranking of resources used to decide where to apply, interview, and rank. Results  One hundred thirty-six of 870 solicited applicants responded to the questionnaire, for a response rate of 15.6%. Digital platforms were ranked as more important resources than people (i.e., faculty, career advisors, residents, and program directors) when applicants were deciding where to apply and interview. Digital platforms became far less important when applicants were formulating their rank lists, at which time the program's academic reputation, perceived happiness of residents and faculty, interview experience, and geographic location were more important. When learning about residency programs, 100% of respondents engaged with program Web sites, and the majority engaged with program emails ( n =88 [85.4%]), Doximity ( n =82 [79.6%]), Reddit ( n =64 [62.1%]), Instagram ( n =59 [57.3%]), the FREIDA residency program database ( n =55 [53.4%]), and YouTube ( n =53 [51.5%]). All 13 digital platforms included in the survey were utilized by at least 25% of respondents, largely passively (i.e., reading rather than producing content). Respondents indicated that the most important topics to include on program Web sites were the number of residents accepted per year, current resident profiles, and resident alumni job/fellowship placement. Conclusion  Applicants engage heavily with digital media in deciding where to apply and interview but rely heavily on their personal experiences with the program in deciding where to rank. Ophthalmology programs may facilitate recruitment of applicants by optimizing their digital media platforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9927998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99279982023-06-29 In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank Jin, Joy Q. Ahmad, Tessnim R. Parikh, Neeti Srikumaran, Divya Woreta, Fasika Ramanathan, Saras J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Objective  This article characterizes the resources used by ophthalmology residency applicants when deciding where to apply, interview, and rank. Design  Cross-sectional, online survey. Participants  All applicants to the University of California–San Francisco ophthalmology residency program during the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 application cycles. Methods  A secure, anonymous, 19-item post-match questionnaire was distributed to participants inquiring about demographic information, match outcomes, and resources used to learn and make decisions about residency programs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Main Outcome Measures  Qualitative ranking of resources used to decide where to apply, interview, and rank. Results  One hundred thirty-six of 870 solicited applicants responded to the questionnaire, for a response rate of 15.6%. Digital platforms were ranked as more important resources than people (i.e., faculty, career advisors, residents, and program directors) when applicants were deciding where to apply and interview. Digital platforms became far less important when applicants were formulating their rank lists, at which time the program's academic reputation, perceived happiness of residents and faculty, interview experience, and geographic location were more important. When learning about residency programs, 100% of respondents engaged with program Web sites, and the majority engaged with program emails ( n =88 [85.4%]), Doximity ( n =82 [79.6%]), Reddit ( n =64 [62.1%]), Instagram ( n =59 [57.3%]), the FREIDA residency program database ( n =55 [53.4%]), and YouTube ( n =53 [51.5%]). All 13 digital platforms included in the survey were utilized by at least 25% of respondents, largely passively (i.e., reading rather than producing content). Respondents indicated that the most important topics to include on program Web sites were the number of residents accepted per year, current resident profiles, and resident alumni job/fellowship placement. Conclusion  Applicants engage heavily with digital media in deciding where to apply and interview but rely heavily on their personal experiences with the program in deciding where to rank. Ophthalmology programs may facilitate recruitment of applicants by optimizing their digital media platforms. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9927998/ /pubmed/37388176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756123 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Jin, Joy Q.
Ahmad, Tessnim R.
Parikh, Neeti
Srikumaran, Divya
Woreta, Fasika
Ramanathan, Saras
In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank
title In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank
title_full In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank
title_fullStr In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank
title_full_unstemmed In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank
title_short In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank
title_sort in the mind of the ophthalmology residency applicant: deciding where to apply, interview, and rank
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756123
work_keys_str_mv AT jinjoyq inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank
AT ahmadtessnimr inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank
AT parikhneeti inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank
AT srikumarandivya inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank
AT woretafasika inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank
AT ramanathansaras inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank