Cargando…
In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank
Objective This article characterizes the resources used by ophthalmology residency applicants when deciding where to apply, interview, and rank. Design Cross-sectional, online survey. Participants All applicants to the University of California–San Francisco ophthalmology residency program during...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756123 |
_version_ | 1784888562922029056 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Joy Q. Ahmad, Tessnim R. Parikh, Neeti Srikumaran, Divya Woreta, Fasika Ramanathan, Saras |
author_facet | Jin, Joy Q. Ahmad, Tessnim R. Parikh, Neeti Srikumaran, Divya Woreta, Fasika Ramanathan, Saras |
author_sort | Jin, Joy Q. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective This article characterizes the resources used by ophthalmology residency applicants when deciding where to apply, interview, and rank. Design Cross-sectional, online survey. Participants All applicants to the University of California–San Francisco ophthalmology residency program during the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 application cycles. Methods A secure, anonymous, 19-item post-match questionnaire was distributed to participants inquiring about demographic information, match outcomes, and resources used to learn and make decisions about residency programs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Main Outcome Measures Qualitative ranking of resources used to decide where to apply, interview, and rank. Results One hundred thirty-six of 870 solicited applicants responded to the questionnaire, for a response rate of 15.6%. Digital platforms were ranked as more important resources than people (i.e., faculty, career advisors, residents, and program directors) when applicants were deciding where to apply and interview. Digital platforms became far less important when applicants were formulating their rank lists, at which time the program's academic reputation, perceived happiness of residents and faculty, interview experience, and geographic location were more important. When learning about residency programs, 100% of respondents engaged with program Web sites, and the majority engaged with program emails ( n =88 [85.4%]), Doximity ( n =82 [79.6%]), Reddit ( n =64 [62.1%]), Instagram ( n =59 [57.3%]), the FREIDA residency program database ( n =55 [53.4%]), and YouTube ( n =53 [51.5%]). All 13 digital platforms included in the survey were utilized by at least 25% of respondents, largely passively (i.e., reading rather than producing content). Respondents indicated that the most important topics to include on program Web sites were the number of residents accepted per year, current resident profiles, and resident alumni job/fellowship placement. Conclusion Applicants engage heavily with digital media in deciding where to apply and interview but rely heavily on their personal experiences with the program in deciding where to rank. Ophthalmology programs may facilitate recruitment of applicants by optimizing their digital media platforms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9927998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99279982023-06-29 In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank Jin, Joy Q. Ahmad, Tessnim R. Parikh, Neeti Srikumaran, Divya Woreta, Fasika Ramanathan, Saras J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Objective This article characterizes the resources used by ophthalmology residency applicants when deciding where to apply, interview, and rank. Design Cross-sectional, online survey. Participants All applicants to the University of California–San Francisco ophthalmology residency program during the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 application cycles. Methods A secure, anonymous, 19-item post-match questionnaire was distributed to participants inquiring about demographic information, match outcomes, and resources used to learn and make decisions about residency programs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Main Outcome Measures Qualitative ranking of resources used to decide where to apply, interview, and rank. Results One hundred thirty-six of 870 solicited applicants responded to the questionnaire, for a response rate of 15.6%. Digital platforms were ranked as more important resources than people (i.e., faculty, career advisors, residents, and program directors) when applicants were deciding where to apply and interview. Digital platforms became far less important when applicants were formulating their rank lists, at which time the program's academic reputation, perceived happiness of residents and faculty, interview experience, and geographic location were more important. When learning about residency programs, 100% of respondents engaged with program Web sites, and the majority engaged with program emails ( n =88 [85.4%]), Doximity ( n =82 [79.6%]), Reddit ( n =64 [62.1%]), Instagram ( n =59 [57.3%]), the FREIDA residency program database ( n =55 [53.4%]), and YouTube ( n =53 [51.5%]). All 13 digital platforms included in the survey were utilized by at least 25% of respondents, largely passively (i.e., reading rather than producing content). Respondents indicated that the most important topics to include on program Web sites were the number of residents accepted per year, current resident profiles, and resident alumni job/fellowship placement. Conclusion Applicants engage heavily with digital media in deciding where to apply and interview but rely heavily on their personal experiences with the program in deciding where to rank. Ophthalmology programs may facilitate recruitment of applicants by optimizing their digital media platforms. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9927998/ /pubmed/37388176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756123 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Jin, Joy Q. Ahmad, Tessnim R. Parikh, Neeti Srikumaran, Divya Woreta, Fasika Ramanathan, Saras In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank |
title | In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank |
title_full | In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank |
title_fullStr | In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank |
title_full_unstemmed | In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank |
title_short | In the Mind of the Ophthalmology Residency Applicant: Deciding Where to Apply, Interview, and Rank |
title_sort | in the mind of the ophthalmology residency applicant: deciding where to apply, interview, and rank |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinjoyq inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank AT ahmadtessnimr inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank AT parikhneeti inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank AT srikumarandivya inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank AT woretafasika inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank AT ramanathansaras inthemindoftheophthalmologyresidencyapplicantdecidingwheretoapplyinterviewandrank |