Cargando…
Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the simulated tissue models may be used in place of animal-based model for corneal laceration repair for surgical skills acquisition. Design Prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants Seventy-nine military and civilian 2nd- and 3rd-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37389158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725093 |
_version_ | 1784888563173687296 |
---|---|
author | Purt, Boonkit Ducey, Timothy Sykes, Sean Pasternak, Joseph F. Ryan, Denise S. Sia, Rose K. Colyer, Marcus H. |
author_facet | Purt, Boonkit Ducey, Timothy Sykes, Sean Pasternak, Joseph F. Ryan, Denise S. Sia, Rose K. Colyer, Marcus H. |
author_sort | Purt, Boonkit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the simulated tissue models may be used in place of animal-based model for corneal laceration repair for surgical skills acquisition. Design Prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants Seventy-nine military and civilian 2nd- and 3rd-year ophthalmology residents and 16 staff ophthalmologists participating in the Tri-Service Ocular Trauma Skills Laboratory at the Uniformed Services University (Bethesda, MD). Methods Resident ophthalmologists underwent preliminary evaluation of their ability to close a 5-mm linear, full-thickness corneal laceration involving the visual axis. They then were randomized to undergo 90 to 120 minutes of either simulator-based (SIM) or swine cadaveric-tissue-based (CADAVER) corneal laceration repair. The same evaluation was performed post training. On a more limited basis, the study was repeated for attending ophthalmologists to act as a pilot for future analysis and test efficacy for “refresher” training. Main Outcome Measures Successful wound closure with secondary outcomes of suture length, tension, depth, and orientation, as graded by attending ophthalmologists. Results No significant difference in CADAVER versus SIM groups in the primary outcome of watertight wound closure of the corneal laceration. CADAVER group performed better than SIM group for certain metrics (suture depth, p = 0.009; length, p = 0.003; and tension, p = 0.043) that are associated with poor wound closure and increased amount of induced corneal astigmatism. For attending ophthalmologists, six of the eight in each group (SIM and CADAVER) retained or improved their skills. Conclusions For resident ophthalmologists, SIM training is sufficient for achieving the primary outcome of watertight wound closure. However, CADAVER training is superior for wound metrics for the ideal closure. For attending ophthalmologists, SIM training may be useful for retention of skills. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9927999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99279992023-06-29 Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model Purt, Boonkit Ducey, Timothy Sykes, Sean Pasternak, Joseph F. Ryan, Denise S. Sia, Rose K. Colyer, Marcus H. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the simulated tissue models may be used in place of animal-based model for corneal laceration repair for surgical skills acquisition. Design Prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants Seventy-nine military and civilian 2nd- and 3rd-year ophthalmology residents and 16 staff ophthalmologists participating in the Tri-Service Ocular Trauma Skills Laboratory at the Uniformed Services University (Bethesda, MD). Methods Resident ophthalmologists underwent preliminary evaluation of their ability to close a 5-mm linear, full-thickness corneal laceration involving the visual axis. They then were randomized to undergo 90 to 120 minutes of either simulator-based (SIM) or swine cadaveric-tissue-based (CADAVER) corneal laceration repair. The same evaluation was performed post training. On a more limited basis, the study was repeated for attending ophthalmologists to act as a pilot for future analysis and test efficacy for “refresher” training. Main Outcome Measures Successful wound closure with secondary outcomes of suture length, tension, depth, and orientation, as graded by attending ophthalmologists. Results No significant difference in CADAVER versus SIM groups in the primary outcome of watertight wound closure of the corneal laceration. CADAVER group performed better than SIM group for certain metrics (suture depth, p = 0.009; length, p = 0.003; and tension, p = 0.043) that are associated with poor wound closure and increased amount of induced corneal astigmatism. For attending ophthalmologists, six of the eight in each group (SIM and CADAVER) retained or improved their skills. Conclusions For resident ophthalmologists, SIM training is sufficient for achieving the primary outcome of watertight wound closure. However, CADAVER training is superior for wound metrics for the ideal closure. For attending ophthalmologists, SIM training may be useful for retention of skills. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9927999/ /pubmed/37389158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725093 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Purt, Boonkit Ducey, Timothy Sykes, Sean Pasternak, Joseph F. Ryan, Denise S. Sia, Rose K. Colyer, Marcus H. Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model |
title | Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model |
title_full | Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model |
title_short | Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model |
title_sort | comparison of simulation-based versus cadaveric-tissue-based ocular trauma training on novice ophthalmologists: repair of corneal laceration model |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37389158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purtboonkit comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel AT duceytimothy comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel AT sykessean comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel AT pasternakjosephf comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel AT ryandenises comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel AT siarosek comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel AT colyermarcush comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel |