Cargando…

Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model

Purpose  The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the simulated tissue models may be used in place of animal-based model for corneal laceration repair for surgical skills acquisition. Design  Prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants  Seventy-nine military and civilian 2nd- and 3rd-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purt, Boonkit, Ducey, Timothy, Sykes, Sean, Pasternak, Joseph F., Ryan, Denise S., Sia, Rose K., Colyer, Marcus H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37389158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725093
_version_ 1784888563173687296
author Purt, Boonkit
Ducey, Timothy
Sykes, Sean
Pasternak, Joseph F.
Ryan, Denise S.
Sia, Rose K.
Colyer, Marcus H.
author_facet Purt, Boonkit
Ducey, Timothy
Sykes, Sean
Pasternak, Joseph F.
Ryan, Denise S.
Sia, Rose K.
Colyer, Marcus H.
author_sort Purt, Boonkit
collection PubMed
description Purpose  The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the simulated tissue models may be used in place of animal-based model for corneal laceration repair for surgical skills acquisition. Design  Prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants  Seventy-nine military and civilian 2nd- and 3rd-year ophthalmology residents and 16 staff ophthalmologists participating in the Tri-Service Ocular Trauma Skills Laboratory at the Uniformed Services University (Bethesda, MD). Methods  Resident ophthalmologists underwent preliminary evaluation of their ability to close a 5-mm linear, full-thickness corneal laceration involving the visual axis. They then were randomized to undergo 90 to 120 minutes of either simulator-based (SIM) or swine cadaveric-tissue-based (CADAVER) corneal laceration repair. The same evaluation was performed post training. On a more limited basis, the study was repeated for attending ophthalmologists to act as a pilot for future analysis and test efficacy for “refresher” training. Main Outcome Measures  Successful wound closure with secondary outcomes of suture length, tension, depth, and orientation, as graded by attending ophthalmologists. Results  No significant difference in CADAVER versus SIM groups in the primary outcome of watertight wound closure of the corneal laceration. CADAVER group performed better than SIM group for certain metrics (suture depth, p  = 0.009; length, p  = 0.003; and tension, p  = 0.043) that are associated with poor wound closure and increased amount of induced corneal astigmatism. For attending ophthalmologists, six of the eight in each group (SIM and CADAVER) retained or improved their skills. Conclusions  For resident ophthalmologists, SIM training is sufficient for achieving the primary outcome of watertight wound closure. However, CADAVER training is superior for wound metrics for the ideal closure. For attending ophthalmologists, SIM training may be useful for retention of skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9927999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99279992023-06-29 Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model Purt, Boonkit Ducey, Timothy Sykes, Sean Pasternak, Joseph F. Ryan, Denise S. Sia, Rose K. Colyer, Marcus H. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Purpose  The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the simulated tissue models may be used in place of animal-based model for corneal laceration repair for surgical skills acquisition. Design  Prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants  Seventy-nine military and civilian 2nd- and 3rd-year ophthalmology residents and 16 staff ophthalmologists participating in the Tri-Service Ocular Trauma Skills Laboratory at the Uniformed Services University (Bethesda, MD). Methods  Resident ophthalmologists underwent preliminary evaluation of their ability to close a 5-mm linear, full-thickness corneal laceration involving the visual axis. They then were randomized to undergo 90 to 120 minutes of either simulator-based (SIM) or swine cadaveric-tissue-based (CADAVER) corneal laceration repair. The same evaluation was performed post training. On a more limited basis, the study was repeated for attending ophthalmologists to act as a pilot for future analysis and test efficacy for “refresher” training. Main Outcome Measures  Successful wound closure with secondary outcomes of suture length, tension, depth, and orientation, as graded by attending ophthalmologists. Results  No significant difference in CADAVER versus SIM groups in the primary outcome of watertight wound closure of the corneal laceration. CADAVER group performed better than SIM group for certain metrics (suture depth, p  = 0.009; length, p  = 0.003; and tension, p  = 0.043) that are associated with poor wound closure and increased amount of induced corneal astigmatism. For attending ophthalmologists, six of the eight in each group (SIM and CADAVER) retained or improved their skills. Conclusions  For resident ophthalmologists, SIM training is sufficient for achieving the primary outcome of watertight wound closure. However, CADAVER training is superior for wound metrics for the ideal closure. For attending ophthalmologists, SIM training may be useful for retention of skills. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9927999/ /pubmed/37389158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725093 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Purt, Boonkit
Ducey, Timothy
Sykes, Sean
Pasternak, Joseph F.
Ryan, Denise S.
Sia, Rose K.
Colyer, Marcus H.
Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model
title Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model
title_full Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model
title_fullStr Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model
title_short Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model
title_sort comparison of simulation-based versus cadaveric-tissue-based ocular trauma training on novice ophthalmologists: repair of corneal laceration model
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9927999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37389158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725093
work_keys_str_mv AT purtboonkit comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel
AT duceytimothy comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel
AT sykessean comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel
AT pasternakjosephf comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel
AT ryandenises comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel
AT siarosek comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel
AT colyermarcush comparisonofsimulationbasedversuscadaverictissuebasedoculartraumatrainingonnoviceophthalmologistsrepairofcorneallacerationmodel