Cargando…

Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents

Objective  To assess ophthalmology trainees' self-reported use of and attitudes toward social media. Methods  An online survey was distributed by email to ophthalmology residency applicants of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between September 2016 and January 2020. Results  Of the 1,688 email r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watane, Arjun, Al-khersan, Hasenin, Kalavar, Meghana, Ahmed, Bilal, Venincasa, Michael, Sridhar, Jayanth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736661
_version_ 1784888567091167232
author Watane, Arjun
Al-khersan, Hasenin
Kalavar, Meghana
Ahmed, Bilal
Venincasa, Michael
Sridhar, Jayanth
author_facet Watane, Arjun
Al-khersan, Hasenin
Kalavar, Meghana
Ahmed, Bilal
Venincasa, Michael
Sridhar, Jayanth
author_sort Watane, Arjun
collection PubMed
description Objective  To assess ophthalmology trainees' self-reported use of and attitudes toward social media. Methods  An online survey was distributed by email to ophthalmology residency applicants of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between September 2016 and January 2020. Results  Of the 1,688 email recipients, the survey was filled by 208 ophthalmology trainees (12.3%). Nearly all trainees reported using social media for personal purposes (92.3%), while less than half used social media for professional purposes (43.4%). There were mixed sentiments regarding the impact of social media on the patient–physician relationship, with the majority feeling that it challenges a physician's authority (55.2%) but also empowers the patient (57.5%) and encourages shared care (92.8%). Twenty-five percent of trainees had reviewed professional social media guidelines, and most rated the quality of medical information on social media as “poor” (60.9%). There were low rates of trainees looking up patients (13.8%), providing their account information to patients (1.5%), responding to patients' messages (2.6%), following patients' accounts (2.6%), and being followed by patients (2.6%). Conclusion  The majority of ophthalmology trainees are active on social media. As these trainees enter practice, ophthalmology will likely see a rise in social media use. Training programs should consider a formal social media policy that is shared with all trainees as part of their education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9928015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99280152023-06-29 Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents Watane, Arjun Al-khersan, Hasenin Kalavar, Meghana Ahmed, Bilal Venincasa, Michael Sridhar, Jayanth J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) Objective  To assess ophthalmology trainees' self-reported use of and attitudes toward social media. Methods  An online survey was distributed by email to ophthalmology residency applicants of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between September 2016 and January 2020. Results  Of the 1,688 email recipients, the survey was filled by 208 ophthalmology trainees (12.3%). Nearly all trainees reported using social media for personal purposes (92.3%), while less than half used social media for professional purposes (43.4%). There were mixed sentiments regarding the impact of social media on the patient–physician relationship, with the majority feeling that it challenges a physician's authority (55.2%) but also empowers the patient (57.5%) and encourages shared care (92.8%). Twenty-five percent of trainees had reviewed professional social media guidelines, and most rated the quality of medical information on social media as “poor” (60.9%). There were low rates of trainees looking up patients (13.8%), providing their account information to patients (1.5%), responding to patients' messages (2.6%), following patients' accounts (2.6%), and being followed by patients (2.6%). Conclusion  The majority of ophthalmology trainees are active on social media. As these trainees enter practice, ophthalmology will likely see a rise in social media use. Training programs should consider a formal social media policy that is shared with all trainees as part of their education. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9928015/ /pubmed/37388840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736661 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Watane, Arjun
Al-khersan, Hasenin
Kalavar, Meghana
Ahmed, Bilal
Venincasa, Michael
Sridhar, Jayanth
Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_full Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_fullStr Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_full_unstemmed Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_short Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents
title_sort self-reported social media use among ophthalmology residents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736661
work_keys_str_mv AT watanearjun selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT alkhersanhasenin selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT kalavarmeghana selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT ahmedbilal selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT venincasamichael selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents
AT sridharjayanth selfreportedsocialmediauseamongophthalmologyresidents