Cargando…

Feasibility of a virtual reality intervention targeting distress and anxiety symptoms in patients with primary brain tumors: Interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial

PURPOSE: Cancer patients experience distress and anxiety when undergoing imaging studies to monitor disease status, yet these symptoms are not always appropriately identified or well-managed. This interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial explored feasibility and acceptability of a virtual realit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Amanda L., Roche, Kayla N., Leeper, Heather E., Vera, Elizabeth, Mendoza, Tito, Mentges, Kelly, Acquaye, Alvina A., Adegbesan, Kendra, Boris, Lisa, Burton, Eric, Choi, Anna, Grajkowska, Ewa, Kunst, Tricia, Levine, Jason, Lollo, Nicole, Miller, Hope, Panzer, Marissa, Penas-Prado, Marta, Pillai, Valentina, Polskin, Lily, Reyes, Jennifer, Sahebjam, Solmaz, Stockdill, Macy, Theeler, Brett J., Wu, Jing, Gilbert, Mark R., Armstrong, Terri S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789426
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2522094/v1
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Cancer patients experience distress and anxiety when undergoing imaging studies to monitor disease status, yet these symptoms are not always appropriately identified or well-managed. This interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial explored feasibility and acceptability of a virtual reality relaxation (VR) intervention for primary brain tumor (PBT) patients at the time of clinical evaluation. METHODS: English speaking, adult PBT patients with previous reports of distress and upcoming neuroimaging were recruited between March of 2021 and March 2022. A brief VR session was done within 2 weeks prior to neuroimaging with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected before and immediately post-intervention. Self-directed VR use over the next 1 month was encouraged with additional PROs assessments at 1 and 4 weeks. Feasibility metrics included enrollment, eligibility, attrition, and device-related adverse effects with satisfaction measured with qualitative phone interviews. RESULTS: 55 patients were approached via email, 40 (73%) responded and 20 (50%) enrolled (9 declines, 11 screen fails). 65% of participants were ≤ 50 years, 50% were male, 90% were White/non-Hispanic, 85% had good KPS (≥ 90), and most were on active treatment. All patients completed the VR intervention, PROs questionnaires, weekly check-ins, and qualitative interview. Most (90%) reported frequent VR use and high satisfaction and only 7 mild AEs were recorded (headache, dizziness, nausea, neck pain). CONCLUSION: This interim analysis confirmed feasibility and acceptability of a novel VR intervention to target psychological symptoms for PBT patients. Trial enrollment will continue to assess for intervention efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04301089 registered on 3/9/2020.