Cargando…
Effect of guided Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation on corneal endothelial cells: A 2-year comparative study
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of guided and non-guided Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation on the corneal endothelium. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent AGV implantation in the anterior chamber (AC) were reviewed retrospectively. The eyes were divided into two groups depending...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36787298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278340 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To compare the effects of guided and non-guided Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation on the corneal endothelium. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent AGV implantation in the anterior chamber (AC) were reviewed retrospectively. The eyes were divided into two groups depending on the use of a guidance technique with spatula and a 4–0 nylon intraluminal stent. Specular microscopy was performed to measure corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss after surgery, and the rate of ECD change was calculated. Tube parameters were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). RESULTS: The ECD loss during 2 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the guided AGV implantation (gAGV) group than in the non-guided implantation (ngAGV) group, and the rate of ECD change was -0.62 ± 1.23 and -1.42 ± 1.57%/month in the gAGV and ngAGV groups, respectively (p = 0.003). The mean tube–cornea distance (TCD) and mean tube–cornea angle (TCA) were significantly greater in the gAGV group than in the ngAGV group. The frequency of tube repositioning within 2 years after surgery was 0% in the gAGV group and 12.66% in the ngAGV group (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a guidance technique can reduce corneal endothelial loss during the first 2 years after AGV implantation in the AC. The tube was positioned at a more distant and wider angle from the cornea in the eyes of the gAGV group, which may have contributed to the reduced need for tube repositioning to prevent corneal decompensation. |
---|