Cargando…
Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task
Humans stand out for their capacity to flexibly cooperate, possibly because they understand their partners' role. Researchers have explored if such understanding is unique to humans by assessing whether non-human species wait to manipulate a cooperative apparatus until a delayed partner arrives...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36787798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2189 |
_version_ | 1784888667670577152 |
---|---|
author | Martínez, Mayte Robinson, Lauren M. Brosnan, Sarah F. Range, Friederike |
author_facet | Martínez, Mayte Robinson, Lauren M. Brosnan, Sarah F. Range, Friederike |
author_sort | Martínez, Mayte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans stand out for their capacity to flexibly cooperate, possibly because they understand their partners' role. Researchers have explored if such understanding is unique to humans by assessing whether non-human species wait to manipulate a cooperative apparatus until a delayed partner arrives. If animals do wait, then it is assumed that they recognize the need for a partner. However, success in these tasks may be the result of social facilitation, while failure may be due to poor inhibitory control. Moreover, this approach does not test if animals take their partners’ actions into account. Here we trained dogs to press a button simultaneously with their human partner. Afterwards, we tested them in several conditions to disentangle which elements of their partner's behaviour they take into account. Dogs waited to press the button until the delayed partner arrived, the button was available to the partner and the partner acted (pressed the button). We found no relationship between inhibitory control and success. We conclude that dogs are not merely reacting to the presence of their human partners, but are also taking their actions into account when coordinating with them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9928525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99285252023-02-16 Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task Martínez, Mayte Robinson, Lauren M. Brosnan, Sarah F. Range, Friederike Proc Biol Sci Behaviour Humans stand out for their capacity to flexibly cooperate, possibly because they understand their partners' role. Researchers have explored if such understanding is unique to humans by assessing whether non-human species wait to manipulate a cooperative apparatus until a delayed partner arrives. If animals do wait, then it is assumed that they recognize the need for a partner. However, success in these tasks may be the result of social facilitation, while failure may be due to poor inhibitory control. Moreover, this approach does not test if animals take their partners’ actions into account. Here we trained dogs to press a button simultaneously with their human partner. Afterwards, we tested them in several conditions to disentangle which elements of their partner's behaviour they take into account. Dogs waited to press the button until the delayed partner arrived, the button was available to the partner and the partner acted (pressed the button). We found no relationship between inhibitory control and success. We conclude that dogs are not merely reacting to the presence of their human partners, but are also taking their actions into account when coordinating with them. The Royal Society 2023-02-22 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9928525/ /pubmed/36787798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2189 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Behaviour Martínez, Mayte Robinson, Lauren M. Brosnan, Sarah F. Range, Friederike Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task |
title | Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task |
title_full | Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task |
title_fullStr | Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task |
title_full_unstemmed | Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task |
title_short | Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task |
title_sort | dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task |
topic | Behaviour |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36787798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinezmayte dogstakeintoaccounttheactionsofahumanpartnerinacooperativetask AT robinsonlaurenm dogstakeintoaccounttheactionsofahumanpartnerinacooperativetask AT brosnansarahf dogstakeintoaccounttheactionsofahumanpartnerinacooperativetask AT rangefriederike dogstakeintoaccounttheactionsofahumanpartnerinacooperativetask |