Cargando…
A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory
PURPOSE: To validate the hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale (HBVISS) using Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in a sample of Chinese chronic HBV carriers. METHODS: Feasibility, internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability and construct validity were evaluated us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36818123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035071 |
_version_ | 1784888702796824576 |
---|---|
author | Zhong, Sirui Zhou, Yuxiao Zhumajiang, Wuerken Feng, Lifen Gu, Jing Lin, Xiao Hao, Yuantao |
author_facet | Zhong, Sirui Zhou, Yuxiao Zhumajiang, Wuerken Feng, Lifen Gu, Jing Lin, Xiao Hao, Yuantao |
author_sort | Zhong, Sirui |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To validate the hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale (HBVISS) using Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in a sample of Chinese chronic HBV carriers. METHODS: Feasibility, internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability and construct validity were evaluated using a cross-sectional validation study (n = 1,058) in Classical Test Theory. Content validity was assessed by COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. The Item Response Theory (IRT) model parameters were estimated using Samejima’s graded response model, after which item response category characteristic curves were drawn. Item information, test information, and IRT-based marginal reliability were calculated. Measurement invariance was assessed using differential item functioning (DIF). SPSS and R software were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The response rate reached 96.4% and the scale was completed in an average time of 5 min. Content validity of HBVISS was sufficient (+) and the quality of the evidence was high according to COSMIN criteria. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable goodness-of-fit (χ(2)/df = 5.40, standardized root mean square residual = 0.057, root mean square error of approximation = 0.064, goodness-of-fit index = 0.902, comparative fit index = 0.925, incremental fit index = 0.926, and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.912). Cronbach’s α fell in the range of 0.79–0.89 for each dimension and 0.93 for the total scale. Split-half reliability was 0.96. IRT discrimination parameters were estimated to range between 0.959 and 2.333, and the threshold parameters were in the range-3.767 to 3.894. The average score for test information was 12.75 (information >10) when the theta level reached between-4 and + 4. The IRT-based marginal reliability was 0.95 for the total scale and fell in the range of 0.83–0.91 for each dimension. No measurement invariance was detected (d-R(2) < 0.02). CONCLUSION: HBVISS exhibited good feasibility, reliability, validity, and item quality, making it suitable for assessing chronic Hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9928720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99287202023-02-16 A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory Zhong, Sirui Zhou, Yuxiao Zhumajiang, Wuerken Feng, Lifen Gu, Jing Lin, Xiao Hao, Yuantao Front Psychol Psychology PURPOSE: To validate the hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale (HBVISS) using Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in a sample of Chinese chronic HBV carriers. METHODS: Feasibility, internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability and construct validity were evaluated using a cross-sectional validation study (n = 1,058) in Classical Test Theory. Content validity was assessed by COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. The Item Response Theory (IRT) model parameters were estimated using Samejima’s graded response model, after which item response category characteristic curves were drawn. Item information, test information, and IRT-based marginal reliability were calculated. Measurement invariance was assessed using differential item functioning (DIF). SPSS and R software were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The response rate reached 96.4% and the scale was completed in an average time of 5 min. Content validity of HBVISS was sufficient (+) and the quality of the evidence was high according to COSMIN criteria. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable goodness-of-fit (χ(2)/df = 5.40, standardized root mean square residual = 0.057, root mean square error of approximation = 0.064, goodness-of-fit index = 0.902, comparative fit index = 0.925, incremental fit index = 0.926, and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.912). Cronbach’s α fell in the range of 0.79–0.89 for each dimension and 0.93 for the total scale. Split-half reliability was 0.96. IRT discrimination parameters were estimated to range between 0.959 and 2.333, and the threshold parameters were in the range-3.767 to 3.894. The average score for test information was 12.75 (information >10) when the theta level reached between-4 and + 4. The IRT-based marginal reliability was 0.95 for the total scale and fell in the range of 0.83–0.91 for each dimension. No measurement invariance was detected (d-R(2) < 0.02). CONCLUSION: HBVISS exhibited good feasibility, reliability, validity, and item quality, making it suitable for assessing chronic Hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9928720/ /pubmed/36818123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035071 Text en Copyright © 2023 Zhong, Zhou, Zhumajiang, Feng, Gu, Lin and Hao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Zhong, Sirui Zhou, Yuxiao Zhumajiang, Wuerken Feng, Lifen Gu, Jing Lin, Xiao Hao, Yuantao A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory |
title | A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory |
title_full | A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory |
title_fullStr | A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory |
title_full_unstemmed | A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory |
title_short | A psychometric evaluation of Chinese chronic hepatitis B virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory |
title_sort | psychometric evaluation of chinese chronic hepatitis b virus infection-related stigma scale using classical test theory and item response theory |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36818123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhongsirui apsychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT zhouyuxiao apsychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT zhumajiangwuerken apsychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT fenglifen apsychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT gujing apsychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT linxiao apsychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT haoyuantao apsychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT zhongsirui psychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT zhouyuxiao psychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT zhumajiangwuerken psychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT fenglifen psychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT gujing psychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT linxiao psychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory AT haoyuantao psychometricevaluationofchinesechronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrelatedstigmascaleusingclassicaltesttheoryanditemresponsetheory |