Cargando…

Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Most GEP-NEC are diagnosed with metastatic disease, with only minor biopsies available for molecular diagnostics. We assessed the applicability of liquid biopsies for molecular profiling of GEP-NEC. MATERI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knappskog, Stian, Grob, Tobias, Venizelos, Andreas, Amstutz, Ursula, Hjortland, Geir O., Lothe, Inger M., Kersten, Christian, Hofsli, Eva, Sundlöv, Anna, Elvebakken, Hege, Garresori, Herish, Couvelard, Anne, Svensson, Johanna, Sorbye, Halfdan, Perren, Aurel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36753687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.22.00336
_version_ 1784888749708017664
author Knappskog, Stian
Grob, Tobias
Venizelos, Andreas
Amstutz, Ursula
Hjortland, Geir O.
Lothe, Inger M.
Kersten, Christian
Hofsli, Eva
Sundlöv, Anna
Elvebakken, Hege
Garresori, Herish
Couvelard, Anne
Svensson, Johanna
Sorbye, Halfdan
Perren, Aurel
author_facet Knappskog, Stian
Grob, Tobias
Venizelos, Andreas
Amstutz, Ursula
Hjortland, Geir O.
Lothe, Inger M.
Kersten, Christian
Hofsli, Eva
Sundlöv, Anna
Elvebakken, Hege
Garresori, Herish
Couvelard, Anne
Svensson, Johanna
Sorbye, Halfdan
Perren, Aurel
author_sort Knappskog, Stian
collection PubMed
description Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Most GEP-NEC are diagnosed with metastatic disease, with only minor biopsies available for molecular diagnostics. We assessed the applicability of liquid biopsies for molecular profiling of GEP-NEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed massive parallel sequencing of 76 cancer-related genes in circulating tumor DNA from 50 patients with advanced GEP-NEC and compared findings to previous analyses of solid tumor biopsies from the same patients. Plasma samples were collected before therapy, and the median time span between blood and tissue sampling was 25 days. RESULTS: We detected 178 somatic mutations in the liquid biopsies, 127 (71%) were also detected in the solid biopsies, whereas 51 (29%) were unique to the liquid biopsies. In the same 76 genes, we previously detected 199 somatic mutations (single nucleotide variants) in solid biopsies, of which 127 (64%) were also now detected in liquid biopsies. In exploratory subgroup assessments, concordance was higher in patients with liver metastases (P = 1.5 × 10(–5)) and increasing with level of liver involvement (P = 1.2 × 10(–4)). The concordance was similar between GEP-NEC with different primary sites, except being lower in esophageal cases (P = .001). Concordance was not associated with tumor mutation burden. Tumor tissue mutations also detected in liquid biopsies was lower for MSI (40%) versus MSS tumors (70%; P = 7.8 × 10(–4)). We identified potentially targetable mutations in plasma of 26 (52%) of patients with GEP-NEC; nine patients (18%) had potentially targetable mutation detected only in liquid biopsies. CONCLUSION: Liquid biopsy analyses may be an applicable alternative to solid biopsies in GEP-NEC. Liquid biopsies may add additional mutations compared with tumor biopsies alone and could be useful for biomarker assessment in clinical trials for these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9928986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99289862023-02-16 Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Knappskog, Stian Grob, Tobias Venizelos, Andreas Amstutz, Ursula Hjortland, Geir O. Lothe, Inger M. Kersten, Christian Hofsli, Eva Sundlöv, Anna Elvebakken, Hege Garresori, Herish Couvelard, Anne Svensson, Johanna Sorbye, Halfdan Perren, Aurel JCO Precis Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Most GEP-NEC are diagnosed with metastatic disease, with only minor biopsies available for molecular diagnostics. We assessed the applicability of liquid biopsies for molecular profiling of GEP-NEC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed massive parallel sequencing of 76 cancer-related genes in circulating tumor DNA from 50 patients with advanced GEP-NEC and compared findings to previous analyses of solid tumor biopsies from the same patients. Plasma samples were collected before therapy, and the median time span between blood and tissue sampling was 25 days. RESULTS: We detected 178 somatic mutations in the liquid biopsies, 127 (71%) were also detected in the solid biopsies, whereas 51 (29%) were unique to the liquid biopsies. In the same 76 genes, we previously detected 199 somatic mutations (single nucleotide variants) in solid biopsies, of which 127 (64%) were also now detected in liquid biopsies. In exploratory subgroup assessments, concordance was higher in patients with liver metastases (P = 1.5 × 10(–5)) and increasing with level of liver involvement (P = 1.2 × 10(–4)). The concordance was similar between GEP-NEC with different primary sites, except being lower in esophageal cases (P = .001). Concordance was not associated with tumor mutation burden. Tumor tissue mutations also detected in liquid biopsies was lower for MSI (40%) versus MSS tumors (70%; P = 7.8 × 10(–4)). We identified potentially targetable mutations in plasma of 26 (52%) of patients with GEP-NEC; nine patients (18%) had potentially targetable mutation detected only in liquid biopsies. CONCLUSION: Liquid biopsy analyses may be an applicable alternative to solid biopsies in GEP-NEC. Liquid biopsies may add additional mutations compared with tumor biopsies alone and could be useful for biomarker assessment in clinical trials for these patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9928986/ /pubmed/36753687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.22.00336 Text en © 2023 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Knappskog, Stian
Grob, Tobias
Venizelos, Andreas
Amstutz, Ursula
Hjortland, Geir O.
Lothe, Inger M.
Kersten, Christian
Hofsli, Eva
Sundlöv, Anna
Elvebakken, Hege
Garresori, Herish
Couvelard, Anne
Svensson, Johanna
Sorbye, Halfdan
Perren, Aurel
Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
title Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
title_full Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
title_fullStr Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
title_short Mutation Spectrum in Liquid Versus Solid Biopsies From Patients With Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
title_sort mutation spectrum in liquid versus solid biopsies from patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36753687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.22.00336
work_keys_str_mv AT knappskogstian mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT grobtobias mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT venizelosandreas mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT amstutzursula mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT hjortlandgeiro mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT lotheingerm mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT kerstenchristian mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT hofslieva mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT sundlovanna mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT elvebakkenhege mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT garresoriherish mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT couvelardanne mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT svenssonjohanna mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT sorbyehalfdan mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT perrenaurel mutationspectruminliquidversussolidbiopsiesfrompatientswithadvancedgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinecarcinoma