Cargando…
Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models
Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, frailty, and cachexia have in common skeletal muscle (SM) as a main component of their pathophysiology. The reference method for SM mass measurement is whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) appendicular lean mass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36788294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29827-y |
_version_ | 1784888766600577024 |
---|---|
author | McCarthy, Cassidy Tinsley, Grant M. Bosy-Westphal, Anja Müller, Manfred J. Shepherd, John Gallagher, Dympna Heymsfield, Steven B. |
author_facet | McCarthy, Cassidy Tinsley, Grant M. Bosy-Westphal, Anja Müller, Manfred J. Shepherd, John Gallagher, Dympna Heymsfield, Steven B. |
author_sort | McCarthy, Cassidy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, frailty, and cachexia have in common skeletal muscle (SM) as a main component of their pathophysiology. The reference method for SM mass measurement is whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) appendicular lean mass (ALM) serves as an affordable and practical SM surrogate. Empirical equations, developed on relatively small and diverse samples, are now used to predict total body SM from ALM and other covariates; prediction models for extremity SM mass are lacking. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate total body, arm, and leg SM mass prediction equations based on a large sample (N = 475) of adults evaluated with whole-body MRI and DXA for SM and ALM, respectively. Initial models were fit using ordinary least squares stepwise selection procedures; covariates beyond extremity lean mass made only small contributions to the final models that were developed using Deming regression. All three developed final models (total, arm, and leg) had high R(2)s (0.88–0.93; all p < 0.001) and small root-mean square errors (1.74, 0.41, and 0.95 kg) with no bias in the validation sample (N = 95). The new total body SM prediction model (SM = 1.12 × ALM – 0.63) showed good performance, with some bias, against previously reported DXA-ALM prediction models. These new total body and extremity SM prediction models, developed and validated in a large sample, afford an important and practical opportunity to evaluate SM mass in research and clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9929067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99290672023-02-16 Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models McCarthy, Cassidy Tinsley, Grant M. Bosy-Westphal, Anja Müller, Manfred J. Shepherd, John Gallagher, Dympna Heymsfield, Steven B. Sci Rep Article Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, frailty, and cachexia have in common skeletal muscle (SM) as a main component of their pathophysiology. The reference method for SM mass measurement is whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) appendicular lean mass (ALM) serves as an affordable and practical SM surrogate. Empirical equations, developed on relatively small and diverse samples, are now used to predict total body SM from ALM and other covariates; prediction models for extremity SM mass are lacking. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate total body, arm, and leg SM mass prediction equations based on a large sample (N = 475) of adults evaluated with whole-body MRI and DXA for SM and ALM, respectively. Initial models were fit using ordinary least squares stepwise selection procedures; covariates beyond extremity lean mass made only small contributions to the final models that were developed using Deming regression. All three developed final models (total, arm, and leg) had high R(2)s (0.88–0.93; all p < 0.001) and small root-mean square errors (1.74, 0.41, and 0.95 kg) with no bias in the validation sample (N = 95). The new total body SM prediction model (SM = 1.12 × ALM – 0.63) showed good performance, with some bias, against previously reported DXA-ALM prediction models. These new total body and extremity SM prediction models, developed and validated in a large sample, afford an important and practical opportunity to evaluate SM mass in research and clinical settings. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9929067/ /pubmed/36788294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29827-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article McCarthy, Cassidy Tinsley, Grant M. Bosy-Westphal, Anja Müller, Manfred J. Shepherd, John Gallagher, Dympna Heymsfield, Steven B. Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models |
title | Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models |
title_full | Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models |
title_fullStr | Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models |
title_full_unstemmed | Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models |
title_short | Total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition models |
title_sort | total and regional appendicular skeletal muscle mass prediction from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36788294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29827-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccarthycassidy totalandregionalappendicularskeletalmusclemasspredictionfromdualenergyxrayabsorptiometrybodycompositionmodels AT tinsleygrantm totalandregionalappendicularskeletalmusclemasspredictionfromdualenergyxrayabsorptiometrybodycompositionmodels AT bosywestphalanja totalandregionalappendicularskeletalmusclemasspredictionfromdualenergyxrayabsorptiometrybodycompositionmodels AT mullermanfredj totalandregionalappendicularskeletalmusclemasspredictionfromdualenergyxrayabsorptiometrybodycompositionmodels AT shepherdjohn totalandregionalappendicularskeletalmusclemasspredictionfromdualenergyxrayabsorptiometrybodycompositionmodels AT gallagherdympna totalandregionalappendicularskeletalmusclemasspredictionfromdualenergyxrayabsorptiometrybodycompositionmodels AT heymsfieldstevenb totalandregionalappendicularskeletalmusclemasspredictionfromdualenergyxrayabsorptiometrybodycompositionmodels |