Cargando…
Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R(1ρ) dispersion
BACKGROUND: R(1ρ) (or spin-lock) imaging is prone to artifacts arising from field inhomogeneities that may impact the R(1ρ) quantification. Previous research has proposed two types of method to manage the artifacts in continuous-wave constant amplitude spin-lock, one is based on the composite block...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819267 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-959 |
_version_ | 1784888840142454784 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Ping |
author_facet | Wang, Ping |
author_sort | Wang, Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: R(1ρ) (or spin-lock) imaging is prone to artifacts arising from field inhomogeneities that may impact the R(1ρ) quantification. Previous research has proposed two types of method to manage the artifacts in continuous-wave constant amplitude spin-lock, one is based on the composite block pulses to compensate for the field imperfections, another category uses adiabatic pulses in the R(1ρ) pre-pulse to excite and reverse the magnetization (named adiabatic prepared approach). Although both methods have proved their efficiency in alleviating artifacts, we observed that the adiabatic pulse approach could produce much lower R(1ρ) dispersion in human knee cartilage than the block pulse method (characterized by the R(1ρ) difference ∆R(1ρ) =11.4 Hz (from spin-lock field 50 to 500 Hz) for the block pulse method vs. ∆R(1ρ) =4.5 Hz for the adiabatic pulse approach). Prompted by this observation, the purpose of this study was to investigate the underlying factors that may affect the R(1ρ) dispersion through numerical simulations based on the two-pool exchanging Bloch-McConnell equations. METHODS: The effects of free water pool size P(a) (from 0.80 to 0.95), chemical exchange rate k(b) (from the bound to free water pool, ranged from 500 to 3,000 Hz), adiabatic pulse duration T(p) (from 5.0 to 25 ms), and the chemical shift of the bound pool ppm(b) (from 1.0 to 5.0 ppm) were examined on the degree of the R(1ρ) dispersion for the two R(1ρ) imaging methods. RESULTS: In general, the greater the ppm(b), k(b), T(p), and the smaller P(a), the more significant difference in R(1ρ) dispersion between the block and adiabatic approaches, with the dispersion curve of the adiabatic method becoming flatter. CONCLUSIONS: The adiabatic prepared approach may compromise the R(1ρ) dispersion, the effect is determined by the combination of the tissue and radiofrequency (RF) pulse properties. It is suggested that care should be taken when using the adiabatically prepared approach to study R(1ρ) dispersion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9929376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99293762023-02-16 Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R(1ρ) dispersion Wang, Ping Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: R(1ρ) (or spin-lock) imaging is prone to artifacts arising from field inhomogeneities that may impact the R(1ρ) quantification. Previous research has proposed two types of method to manage the artifacts in continuous-wave constant amplitude spin-lock, one is based on the composite block pulses to compensate for the field imperfections, another category uses adiabatic pulses in the R(1ρ) pre-pulse to excite and reverse the magnetization (named adiabatic prepared approach). Although both methods have proved their efficiency in alleviating artifacts, we observed that the adiabatic pulse approach could produce much lower R(1ρ) dispersion in human knee cartilage than the block pulse method (characterized by the R(1ρ) difference ∆R(1ρ) =11.4 Hz (from spin-lock field 50 to 500 Hz) for the block pulse method vs. ∆R(1ρ) =4.5 Hz for the adiabatic pulse approach). Prompted by this observation, the purpose of this study was to investigate the underlying factors that may affect the R(1ρ) dispersion through numerical simulations based on the two-pool exchanging Bloch-McConnell equations. METHODS: The effects of free water pool size P(a) (from 0.80 to 0.95), chemical exchange rate k(b) (from the bound to free water pool, ranged from 500 to 3,000 Hz), adiabatic pulse duration T(p) (from 5.0 to 25 ms), and the chemical shift of the bound pool ppm(b) (from 1.0 to 5.0 ppm) were examined on the degree of the R(1ρ) dispersion for the two R(1ρ) imaging methods. RESULTS: In general, the greater the ppm(b), k(b), T(p), and the smaller P(a), the more significant difference in R(1ρ) dispersion between the block and adiabatic approaches, with the dispersion curve of the adiabatic method becoming flatter. CONCLUSIONS: The adiabatic prepared approach may compromise the R(1ρ) dispersion, the effect is determined by the combination of the tissue and radiofrequency (RF) pulse properties. It is suggested that care should be taken when using the adiabatically prepared approach to study R(1ρ) dispersion. AME Publishing Company 2022-12-09 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9929376/ /pubmed/36819267 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-959 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Ping Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R(1ρ) dispersion |
title | Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R(1ρ) dispersion |
title_full | Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R(1ρ) dispersion |
title_fullStr | Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R(1ρ) dispersion |
title_full_unstemmed | Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R(1ρ) dispersion |
title_short | Adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the R(1ρ) dispersion |
title_sort | adiabatically prepared spin-lock could reduce the r(1ρ) dispersion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819267 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-959 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangping adiabaticallypreparedspinlockcouldreducether1rdispersion |