Cargando…

Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments?

Studies showed that motor expertise was found to induce improvement in language processing. Grounded and situated approaches attributed this effect to an underlying automatic simulation of the motor experience elicited by action words, similar to motor imagery (MI), and suggest shared representation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayram, Mariam, Palluel-Germain, Richard, Lebon, Florent, Durand, Edith, Harquel, Sylvain, Perrone-Bertolotti, Marcela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.982849
_version_ 1784888863080054784
author Bayram, Mariam
Palluel-Germain, Richard
Lebon, Florent
Durand, Edith
Harquel, Sylvain
Perrone-Bertolotti, Marcela
author_facet Bayram, Mariam
Palluel-Germain, Richard
Lebon, Florent
Durand, Edith
Harquel, Sylvain
Perrone-Bertolotti, Marcela
author_sort Bayram, Mariam
collection PubMed
description Studies showed that motor expertise was found to induce improvement in language processing. Grounded and situated approaches attributed this effect to an underlying automatic simulation of the motor experience elicited by action words, similar to motor imagery (MI), and suggest shared representations of action conceptualization. Interestingly, recent results also suggest that the mental simulation of action by MI training induces motor-system modifications and improves motor performance. Consequently, we hypothesize that, since MI training can induce motor-system modifications, it could be used to reinforce the functional connections between motor and language system, and could thus lead to improved language performance. Here, we explore these potential interactions by reviewing recent fundamental and clinical literature in the action-language and MI domains. We suggested that exploiting the link between action language and MI could open new avenues for complementary language improvement programs. We summarize the current literature to evaluate the rationale behind this novel training and to explore the mechanisms underlying MI and its impact on language performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9929469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99294692023-02-16 Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments? Bayram, Mariam Palluel-Germain, Richard Lebon, Florent Durand, Edith Harquel, Sylvain Perrone-Bertolotti, Marcela Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Studies showed that motor expertise was found to induce improvement in language processing. Grounded and situated approaches attributed this effect to an underlying automatic simulation of the motor experience elicited by action words, similar to motor imagery (MI), and suggest shared representations of action conceptualization. Interestingly, recent results also suggest that the mental simulation of action by MI training induces motor-system modifications and improves motor performance. Consequently, we hypothesize that, since MI training can induce motor-system modifications, it could be used to reinforce the functional connections between motor and language system, and could thus lead to improved language performance. Here, we explore these potential interactions by reviewing recent fundamental and clinical literature in the action-language and MI domains. We suggested that exploiting the link between action language and MI could open new avenues for complementary language improvement programs. We summarize the current literature to evaluate the rationale behind this novel training and to explore the mechanisms underlying MI and its impact on language performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9929469/ /pubmed/36816506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.982849 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bayram, Palluel-Germain, Lebon, Durand, Harquel and Perrone-Bertolotti. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bayram, Mariam
Palluel-Germain, Richard
Lebon, Florent
Durand, Edith
Harquel, Sylvain
Perrone-Bertolotti, Marcela
Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments?
title Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments?
title_full Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments?
title_fullStr Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments?
title_full_unstemmed Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments?
title_short Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments?
title_sort motor imagery training to improve language processing: what are the arguments?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36816506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.982849
work_keys_str_mv AT bayrammariam motorimagerytrainingtoimprovelanguageprocessingwhatarethearguments
AT palluelgermainrichard motorimagerytrainingtoimprovelanguageprocessingwhatarethearguments
AT lebonflorent motorimagerytrainingtoimprovelanguageprocessingwhatarethearguments
AT durandedith motorimagerytrainingtoimprovelanguageprocessingwhatarethearguments
AT harquelsylvain motorimagerytrainingtoimprovelanguageprocessingwhatarethearguments
AT perronebertolottimarcela motorimagerytrainingtoimprovelanguageprocessingwhatarethearguments