Cargando…

Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system

The persistence of imperfect mimicry in nature presents a challenge to mimicry theory. Some hypotheses for the existence of imperfect mimicry make differing predictions depending on how mimetic fidelity is measured. Here, we measure mimetic fidelity in a brood parasite–host system using both trait-b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dixit, Tanmay, Choi, Gary P. T., al-Mosleh, Salem, Lund, Jess, Troscianko, Jolyon, Moya, Collins, Mahadevan, L., Spottiswoode, Claire N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0538
_version_ 1784888869635751936
author Dixit, Tanmay
Choi, Gary P. T.
al-Mosleh, Salem
Lund, Jess
Troscianko, Jolyon
Moya, Collins
Mahadevan, L.
Spottiswoode, Claire N.
author_facet Dixit, Tanmay
Choi, Gary P. T.
al-Mosleh, Salem
Lund, Jess
Troscianko, Jolyon
Moya, Collins
Mahadevan, L.
Spottiswoode, Claire N.
author_sort Dixit, Tanmay
collection PubMed
description The persistence of imperfect mimicry in nature presents a challenge to mimicry theory. Some hypotheses for the existence of imperfect mimicry make differing predictions depending on how mimetic fidelity is measured. Here, we measure mimetic fidelity in a brood parasite–host system using both trait-based and response-based measures of mimetic fidelity. Cuckoo finches Anomalospiza imberbis lay imperfectly mimetic eggs that lack the fine scribbling characteristic of eggs of the tawny-flanked prinia Prinia subflava, a common host species. A trait-based discriminant analysis based on Minkowski functionals—that use geometric and topological morphometric methods related to egg pattern shape and coverage—reflects this consistent difference between host and parasite eggs. These methods could be applied to quantify other phenotypes including stripes and waved patterns. Furthermore, by painting scribbles onto cuckoo finch eggs and testing their rate of rejection compared to control eggs (i.e. a response-based approach to quantify mimetic fidelity), we show that prinias do not discriminate between eggs based on the absence of scribbles. Overall, our results support relaxed selection on cuckoo finches to mimic scribbles, since prinias do not respond differently to eggs with and without scribbles, despite the existence of this consistent trait difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9929498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99294982023-02-16 Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system Dixit, Tanmay Choi, Gary P. T. al-Mosleh, Salem Lund, Jess Troscianko, Jolyon Moya, Collins Mahadevan, L. Spottiswoode, Claire N. Biol Lett Evolutionary Biology The persistence of imperfect mimicry in nature presents a challenge to mimicry theory. Some hypotheses for the existence of imperfect mimicry make differing predictions depending on how mimetic fidelity is measured. Here, we measure mimetic fidelity in a brood parasite–host system using both trait-based and response-based measures of mimetic fidelity. Cuckoo finches Anomalospiza imberbis lay imperfectly mimetic eggs that lack the fine scribbling characteristic of eggs of the tawny-flanked prinia Prinia subflava, a common host species. A trait-based discriminant analysis based on Minkowski functionals—that use geometric and topological morphometric methods related to egg pattern shape and coverage—reflects this consistent difference between host and parasite eggs. These methods could be applied to quantify other phenotypes including stripes and waved patterns. Furthermore, by painting scribbles onto cuckoo finch eggs and testing their rate of rejection compared to control eggs (i.e. a response-based approach to quantify mimetic fidelity), we show that prinias do not discriminate between eggs based on the absence of scribbles. Overall, our results support relaxed selection on cuckoo finches to mimic scribbles, since prinias do not respond differently to eggs with and without scribbles, despite the existence of this consistent trait difference. The Royal Society 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9929498/ /pubmed/36789542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0538 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Evolutionary Biology
Dixit, Tanmay
Choi, Gary P. T.
al-Mosleh, Salem
Lund, Jess
Troscianko, Jolyon
Moya, Collins
Mahadevan, L.
Spottiswoode, Claire N.
Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system
title Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system
title_full Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system
title_fullStr Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system
title_full_unstemmed Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system
title_short Combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system
title_sort combined measures of mimetic fidelity explain imperfect mimicry in a brood parasite–host system
topic Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0538
work_keys_str_mv AT dixittanmay combinedmeasuresofmimeticfidelityexplainimperfectmimicryinabroodparasitehostsystem
AT choigarypt combinedmeasuresofmimeticfidelityexplainimperfectmimicryinabroodparasitehostsystem
AT almoslehsalem combinedmeasuresofmimeticfidelityexplainimperfectmimicryinabroodparasitehostsystem
AT lundjess combinedmeasuresofmimeticfidelityexplainimperfectmimicryinabroodparasitehostsystem
AT trosciankojolyon combinedmeasuresofmimeticfidelityexplainimperfectmimicryinabroodparasitehostsystem
AT moyacollins combinedmeasuresofmimeticfidelityexplainimperfectmimicryinabroodparasitehostsystem
AT mahadevanl combinedmeasuresofmimeticfidelityexplainimperfectmimicryinabroodparasitehostsystem
AT spottiswoodeclairen combinedmeasuresofmimeticfidelityexplainimperfectmimicryinabroodparasitehostsystem