Cargando…
Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It's Time to Revisit
Introduction: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a devastating disease, and patients are at a higher risk of death without liver transplantation. Indicators are needed to identify the risk of death in ALF, which will help in the timely referral of patients to specialized centers. Clichy criteriaand King’s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819396 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33810 |
_version_ | 1784888895547113472 |
---|---|
author | Goel, Amit Lalruatsanga, David Himanshu, D Bharti, Vipin Sharma, Deepak |
author_facet | Goel, Amit Lalruatsanga, David Himanshu, D Bharti, Vipin Sharma, Deepak |
author_sort | Goel, Amit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a devastating disease, and patients are at a higher risk of death without liver transplantation. Indicators are needed to identify the risk of death in ALF, which will help in the timely referral of patients to specialized centers. Clichy criteriaand King’s College Hospital (KCH) criteria are the most widely used prognostic criteria. Real-life application of Clichy criteria is limited due to the non-availability of factor V level measurement. KCH criteria have good specificity but low sensitivity to predict outcomes. Therefore, we attempted to use the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score in ALF patients as prognostic indicators and need for liver transplantation. Methods: Forty-one patients with ALF were enrolled in the study. On the day of admission, MELD and CLIF-SOFA scores were calculated for each patient. Area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of MELD and CLIF-SOFA score were calculated to predict the outcome of the patients. Results: Out of 41 patients, nine patients left against medical advice. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and DA for the MELD score of enrolled patients in the study were 81.5%, 62.5%, 59.5%, 83.3%, 70.1%, and for the CLIF-SOFA score of enrolled patients in the study were 88.9%, 90.0%, 85.7%, 92.3%, 89.6% respectively. Patients who did not survive had higher INR, MELD, CLIF-SOFA scores, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) grades. Five patients who had a combination of MELD ≥30 and CLIF-SOFA ≥10, expired. Conclusion: In our study, we used MELD score and CLIF-SOFA as prognostic markers, and we concluded that CLIF-SOFA is a better predictor of mortality than MELD score in terms of sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and diagnostic accuracy. AUROC for CLIF-SOFA score is higher when compared to the MELD score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9929612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99296122023-02-16 Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It's Time to Revisit Goel, Amit Lalruatsanga, David Himanshu, D Bharti, Vipin Sharma, Deepak Cureus Internal Medicine Introduction: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a devastating disease, and patients are at a higher risk of death without liver transplantation. Indicators are needed to identify the risk of death in ALF, which will help in the timely referral of patients to specialized centers. Clichy criteriaand King’s College Hospital (KCH) criteria are the most widely used prognostic criteria. Real-life application of Clichy criteria is limited due to the non-availability of factor V level measurement. KCH criteria have good specificity but low sensitivity to predict outcomes. Therefore, we attempted to use the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score in ALF patients as prognostic indicators and need for liver transplantation. Methods: Forty-one patients with ALF were enrolled in the study. On the day of admission, MELD and CLIF-SOFA scores were calculated for each patient. Area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of MELD and CLIF-SOFA score were calculated to predict the outcome of the patients. Results: Out of 41 patients, nine patients left against medical advice. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and DA for the MELD score of enrolled patients in the study were 81.5%, 62.5%, 59.5%, 83.3%, 70.1%, and for the CLIF-SOFA score of enrolled patients in the study were 88.9%, 90.0%, 85.7%, 92.3%, 89.6% respectively. Patients who did not survive had higher INR, MELD, CLIF-SOFA scores, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) grades. Five patients who had a combination of MELD ≥30 and CLIF-SOFA ≥10, expired. Conclusion: In our study, we used MELD score and CLIF-SOFA as prognostic markers, and we concluded that CLIF-SOFA is a better predictor of mortality than MELD score in terms of sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and diagnostic accuracy. AUROC for CLIF-SOFA score is higher when compared to the MELD score. Cureus 2023-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9929612/ /pubmed/36819396 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33810 Text en Copyright © 2023, Goel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Internal Medicine Goel, Amit Lalruatsanga, David Himanshu, D Bharti, Vipin Sharma, Deepak Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It's Time to Revisit |
title | Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It's Time to Revisit |
title_full | Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It's Time to Revisit |
title_fullStr | Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It's Time to Revisit |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It's Time to Revisit |
title_short | Acute Liver Failure Prognostic Criteria: It's Time to Revisit |
title_sort | acute liver failure prognostic criteria: it's time to revisit |
topic | Internal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819396 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goelamit acuteliverfailureprognosticcriteriaitstimetorevisit AT lalruatsangadavid acuteliverfailureprognosticcriteriaitstimetorevisit AT himanshud acuteliverfailureprognosticcriteriaitstimetorevisit AT bhartivipin acuteliverfailureprognosticcriteriaitstimetorevisit AT sharmadeepak acuteliverfailureprognosticcriteriaitstimetorevisit |