Cargando…

The effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: To explore the value of 2 different methods for planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of patients who successfully underwent LAAC with the Watc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Wei, Zhang, Jian, Ruan, Zhongbao, Zhao, Juan, Zhang, Bo, Zhang, Ji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819592
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-6183
_version_ 1784888929316503552
author Li, Wei
Zhang, Jian
Ruan, Zhongbao
Zhao, Juan
Zhang, Bo
Zhang, Ji
author_facet Li, Wei
Zhang, Jian
Ruan, Zhongbao
Zhao, Juan
Zhang, Bo
Zhang, Ji
author_sort Li, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To explore the value of 2 different methods for planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of patients who successfully underwent LAAC with the Watchman device at The Affiliated Taizhou People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from August 2020 to February 2022. Two different methods were used to plan the landing zone and measure the longest diameter, average diameter, depth, and perimeter of the landing zone. The difference between the 2 methods and the correlation between their measurements and occluder size were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients undergoing LAAC were included, with an average age of 69.35±7.1 years, of whom 30 (45.5%) were women. The mean error between the longest diameter measured by the traditional method and the actual value was 2.90±2.83 mm, and the mean absolute error (MAE) was 2.71 (1.17, 4.38) mm. The mean error between the longest diameter measured by the new method and the actual value was 0.9 (−0.13, 2.50) mm, and its MAE was 1.4 (0.40, 2.53) mm. The error of the longest diameter measured by the traditional method was larger than that measured by the new method (P<0.001). The mean error between the depth measured by the traditional method and the actual value was 1.40±3.45 mm, and the MAE was 2.36 (0.74, 4.58) mm. The mean error between the depth measured by the new method and the actual value was 0.10 (−1.33, 1.95) mm, and the MAE was 1.55 (0.60, 3.10) mm. Likewise, the depth error measured by the traditional method was larger than that measured by the new method (P<0.05). The correlation between the perimeter and the size of the occluder was the strongest (r=0.919, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With CCTA, the new method is more accurate in planning landing zone than the traditional method. It is particularly important to select the occluder size for the patients with flat oval landing zone ostium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9929771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99297712023-02-16 The effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study Li, Wei Zhang, Jian Ruan, Zhongbao Zhao, Juan Zhang, Bo Zhang, Ji Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To explore the value of 2 different methods for planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of patients who successfully underwent LAAC with the Watchman device at The Affiliated Taizhou People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from August 2020 to February 2022. Two different methods were used to plan the landing zone and measure the longest diameter, average diameter, depth, and perimeter of the landing zone. The difference between the 2 methods and the correlation between their measurements and occluder size were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients undergoing LAAC were included, with an average age of 69.35±7.1 years, of whom 30 (45.5%) were women. The mean error between the longest diameter measured by the traditional method and the actual value was 2.90±2.83 mm, and the mean absolute error (MAE) was 2.71 (1.17, 4.38) mm. The mean error between the longest diameter measured by the new method and the actual value was 0.9 (−0.13, 2.50) mm, and its MAE was 1.4 (0.40, 2.53) mm. The error of the longest diameter measured by the traditional method was larger than that measured by the new method (P<0.001). The mean error between the depth measured by the traditional method and the actual value was 1.40±3.45 mm, and the MAE was 2.36 (0.74, 4.58) mm. The mean error between the depth measured by the new method and the actual value was 0.10 (−1.33, 1.95) mm, and the MAE was 1.55 (0.60, 3.10) mm. Likewise, the depth error measured by the traditional method was larger than that measured by the new method (P<0.05). The correlation between the perimeter and the size of the occluder was the strongest (r=0.919, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With CCTA, the new method is more accurate in planning landing zone than the traditional method. It is particularly important to select the occluder size for the patients with flat oval landing zone ostium. AME Publishing Company 2023-01-31 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9929771/ /pubmed/36819592 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-6183 Text en 2023 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Wei
Zhang, Jian
Ruan, Zhongbao
Zhao, Juan
Zhang, Bo
Zhang, Ji
The effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study
title The effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study
title_full The effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study
title_fullStr The effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study
title_short The effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study
title_sort effect of two different methods of planning landing zone for left atrial appendage closure by cardiac computed tomography angiography: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819592
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-6183
work_keys_str_mv AT liwei theeffectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT zhangjian theeffectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT ruanzhongbao theeffectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT zhaojuan theeffectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT zhangbo theeffectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT zhangji theeffectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT liwei effectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT zhangjian effectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT ruanzhongbao effectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT zhaojuan effectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT zhangbo effectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy
AT zhangji effectoftwodifferentmethodsofplanninglandingzoneforleftatrialappendageclosurebycardiaccomputedtomographyangiographyacomparativestudy