Changes of blood gas analysis in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients during long-term prone position ventilation: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Prone position ventilation (PPV) has been recommended for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to improve oxygenation. However, whether prolonged prone ventilation will aggravate hyperoxia and whether abdominal compression will aggravate permissive hypercapnia acidosis are topics of concern. We carried out a retrospective analysis to investigate the issues above. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 97 moderate-to-severe ARDS patients who received PPV as part of their treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from November 2015 to May 2021. We collected arterial blood gas of patients according to the 3 periods: supine position ventilation (SPV), PPV early stage (within 4 hours), and PPV middle and late stage (6 hours or later). We established a linear mixed-effects models with “body position changes, times of PPV, gender, age, baseline SOFA, and baseline APACHE II” as fixed effects, and individual and the number of prone positions as random intercept and random slope to investigate the effect of body position changes on blood gas analysis. RESULTS: Among the 97 patients received PPV included, 51 were ICU survivors. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO(2)) and PaO(2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) ratio were significantly higher at the early, middle and late stages of PPV than those in SPV [PFR (mmHg): 158 (118.00, 203.00) vs. 161 (129.00, 202.75) vs. 123 (91.75, 163.00), P<0.05]. Despite the synchronized reduction of FiO(2), the incidence of hyperoxia in the prone position was still significantly higher than that in the supine position [hyperoxia (%):33.33 vs. 33.56 vs. 12.42, P<0.05]; there was no significant change in arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO(2)) at each stage of PPV, but there was a significant increase in PH at PPV middle and late stages than those at early stage [PH: 7.39 (7.34, 7.42) vs. 7.37 (7.31, 7.41), P<0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: Although PPV improves the patients’ oxygenation, the associated incidence of hyperoxia exceeds 33%. Down-regulate FiO(2) more sharply after PPV is necessary, if oxygenation conditions permit. PPV may alleviate the acidosis associated with permissive hypercapnia in ARDS patients treated with lung protective ventilation strategy (LPVS).