Cargando…
Energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel
In this study, utilization of a bio-based fuel in a turbojet engine is comprehensively monitored with adapting various useful indicators for the scope of the study based on thermodynamic principles. In this regard, extensive energy and exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustai...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-11982-z |
_version_ | 1784888974268956672 |
---|---|
author | Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin Balli, Ozgur Caliskan, Hakan |
author_facet | Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin Balli, Ozgur Caliskan, Hakan |
author_sort | Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, utilization of a bio-based fuel in a turbojet engine is comprehensively monitored with adapting various useful indicators for the scope of the study based on thermodynamic principles. In this regard, extensive energy and exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses are performed for both the turbojet engines fueled by jet kerosene and fueled by a bio-based fuel. As per the main findings, the mass stream of combustion emissions is measured to be 4.547 kg s(−1), when the engine is powered by biofuel. The specific fuel consumption and specific thrust are determined as 0.13 kg kN(−1) s(−1) and 147.81 kNs kg(−1) for jet kerosene-powered case, while they are calculated as 0.15 kg kN(−1) s(−1) and 148.23 kNs kg(−1) for biofuel-powered case. If biofuel is selected over jet-kerosene fuel, it is observed that the engine has better energy efficiency performance by 18.18%. The engine’s environmental effect factor value is found as 4.88 for jet-kerosene usage condition, while it is found to be 4.93 for biofuel utilization case. The overall emitted CO(2) emissions is measured as 336,672 kg-CO(2) year(−1) for jet-kerosene usage condition, while it is estimated as 222,012 kg-CO(2) year(−1) for the biofuel utilization case. Also, as far as biofuel is chosen as alternative to jet-kerosene, the environmental damage cost stream, namely the enviroeconomic parameter of the engine, falls from 59,254.27 US$ year(−1) to 39,074.11 US$ year(−1). It is observed that sustainable efficiency factor and exergetic sustainability index outputs of the components of air compressor are the same for jet-kerosene and biofuel utilization cases, which are 8.31 and 7.31, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9930054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99300542023-02-15 Energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin Balli, Ozgur Caliskan, Hakan J Therm Anal Calorim Article In this study, utilization of a bio-based fuel in a turbojet engine is comprehensively monitored with adapting various useful indicators for the scope of the study based on thermodynamic principles. In this regard, extensive energy and exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses are performed for both the turbojet engines fueled by jet kerosene and fueled by a bio-based fuel. As per the main findings, the mass stream of combustion emissions is measured to be 4.547 kg s(−1), when the engine is powered by biofuel. The specific fuel consumption and specific thrust are determined as 0.13 kg kN(−1) s(−1) and 147.81 kNs kg(−1) for jet kerosene-powered case, while they are calculated as 0.15 kg kN(−1) s(−1) and 148.23 kNs kg(−1) for biofuel-powered case. If biofuel is selected over jet-kerosene fuel, it is observed that the engine has better energy efficiency performance by 18.18%. The engine’s environmental effect factor value is found as 4.88 for jet-kerosene usage condition, while it is found to be 4.93 for biofuel utilization case. The overall emitted CO(2) emissions is measured as 336,672 kg-CO(2) year(−1) for jet-kerosene usage condition, while it is estimated as 222,012 kg-CO(2) year(−1) for the biofuel utilization case. Also, as far as biofuel is chosen as alternative to jet-kerosene, the environmental damage cost stream, namely the enviroeconomic parameter of the engine, falls from 59,254.27 US$ year(−1) to 39,074.11 US$ year(−1). It is observed that sustainable efficiency factor and exergetic sustainability index outputs of the components of air compressor are the same for jet-kerosene and biofuel utilization cases, which are 8.31 and 7.31, respectively. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9930054/ /pubmed/36819792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-11982-z Text en © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Akdeniz, Halil Yalcin Balli, Ozgur Caliskan, Hakan Energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel |
title | Energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel |
title_full | Energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel |
title_fullStr | Energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel |
title_full_unstemmed | Energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel |
title_short | Energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel |
title_sort | energy, exergy, thermoecologic, environmental, enviroeconomic and sustainability analyses and assessments of the aircraft engine fueled with biofuel and jet fuel |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-11982-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akdenizhalilyalcin energyexergythermoecologicenvironmentalenviroeconomicandsustainabilityanalysesandassessmentsoftheaircraftenginefueledwithbiofuelandjetfuel AT balliozgur energyexergythermoecologicenvironmentalenviroeconomicandsustainabilityanalysesandassessmentsoftheaircraftenginefueledwithbiofuelandjetfuel AT caliskanhakan energyexergythermoecologicenvironmentalenviroeconomicandsustainabilityanalysesandassessmentsoftheaircraftenginefueledwithbiofuelandjetfuel |